How many seperate so's do you build? And what code compiles to where?
I might set up my chrome to build into shared libraries.
Thanks,
Leith Bade
le...@leithalweapon.geek.nz
2009/5/6 Evan Martin e...@chromium.org
I apologize for flogging this horse, but echo 'int
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑) ajw...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org wrote:
Ah, I see. Hmm, going in that direction (from a GraphicsContext back
up to the PlatformCanvas that wraps it) is an interesting question
2009/5/6 Andrew Scherkus scher...@chromium.org:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑) ajw...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org wrote:
Ah, I see. Hmm, going in that direction (from a GraphicsContext back
up to the
2009/5/6 Andrew Scherkus scher...@chromium.org:
We'll ping WebKit to find out the reasoning behind passing in a
GraphicsContext. Probably for performance reasons and reducing extra
blits/copies, but still worth investigating.
Probably that and preserving any active transforms, as Brett
I've been unable to build Chromium on Windows (VS 2005 + Incredibuild).
There seem to be missing generated files. I've tried nuking all the output
directories, gclient sync --force, and rebuild with no luck.
chrome_font_win.cc
C:\chrome\src\app\gfx\chrome_font_win.cc(15) : fatal error C1083:
I assume you had _another_ error before this. Try just building only
chrome_strings in App. It creates generated_resources.h.
M-A
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Kevin Millikin kmilli...@chromium.orgwrote:
I've been unable to build Chromium on Windows (VS 2005 + Incredibuild).
There seem to
There probably was another error before, but after nuking, closing VS, and
trying over again I lost it.
Rebuilding chrome_strings fixed it. Thanks for the quick solution!
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.orgwrote:
I assume you had _another_ error before this.
One more thing - are you planning to implement a function that will return
the status of the machine?For presence information, I want to know if the
computer is idle and if it does, I do not want to signal the presence. Say,
during screen saver or when the screen is shut down (through windows and
base/idle_timer implements this. The only implementation detail would
be exposing it to JS.
It would also make us depend on xscreensaver on Linux which is :( but whatever.
2009/5/6 PhistucK phist...@gmail.com:
One more thing - are you planning to implement a function that will return
the
Great! this will make my IM notifier much much more useful!
:)
Mmmm... so is that going to happen soon? :)
☆PhistucK
2009/5/6 Evan Martin e...@chromium.org
base/idle_timer implements this. The only implementation detail would
be exposing it to JS.
It would also make us depend on
Probably only if you do it. :)
2009/5/6 PhistucK phist...@gmail.com:
Mmmm... so is that going to happen soon? :)
2009/5/6 Evan Martin e...@chromium.org
base/idle_timer implements this. The only implementation detail would
be exposing it to JS.
I wish I had the disk space and the know how.
☆PhistucK
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 20:08, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
Probably only if you do it. :)
2009/5/6 PhistucK phist...@gmail.com:
Mmmm... so is that going to happen soon? :)
2009/5/6 Evan Martin e...@chromium.org
This also makes sense to me as something for the wider web platform. I
wonder if there could be awindow.onidle event. This seems generally
useful to all web apps.
- a
2009/5/6 PhistucK phist...@gmail.com:
I wish I had the disk space and the know how.
☆PhistucK
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 20:08,
(Reposting to the more suitable group)
I really hope this will be merged to the 178 branch quickly...
(It was very hard to debug the extensions the past two days in Chromium...)
Thank you all!!!
☆PhistucK
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 20:37, dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
Author:
Please see WebCanvas in the WebKit API. It was designed for this.
-Darin
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Andrew Scherkus scher...@chromium.orgwrote:
WebKit's MediaPlayerPrivate interface is a bit backwards where they pass in
a GraphicsContext:
We just need to figure out what the correct typedef is for the Mac platform.
-Darin
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
Please see WebCanvas in the WebKit API. It was designed for this.
-Darin
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Andrew Scherkus
We could either use skia/ext/platform_canvas_mac.h or we could define it to
be a CG type. I'm not sure I fully understand the hybridization of CG and
Skia in our Chromium Mac port.
-darin
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
We just need to figure out what
Hmm. Rather than an idle event, how about a general way to notify on
machine state changes? idle / busy, ac / battery, willsleep /
didwake, etc. all seem to have the same usage pattern. Apps could
then key off of the notification to start/stop workers or timers for
idle processing, etc.
Sure, it could be a bit more general.
- a
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org wrote:
Hmm. Rather than an idle event, how about a general way to notify on
machine state changes? idle / busy, ac / battery, willsleep /
didwake, etc. all seem to have the same
I would like to give it a shot (at least the onidle event), if it is
alright.But in order to do that, I need to understand (C++, but that is
another story) where exactly you are laying the connection between the C++
events and the JavaScript events.
(I am probably talking like a newbie (who writes
The phenomenon is quite simple: the addon code may not be loaded
(quite random) for the first loaded page (i.e., your homepage when you
first launch Chrome).
I don't know how to attach a file, but here are the steps to duplicate
it:
1. Just follow any standard way to create a new extension:
The JavaScript bindings are (mostly) generated from .idl files found in
chromium/src/third_party/WebKit/WebCore/*/*.idl
chromium/src/third_party/WebKit/WebCore/dom/Node.cpp has a bunch
of dispatch*Event methods.
I don't know if the sandbox will get in your way, but doing this entirely in
WebKit
I will try and sit on it over the weekend. But, sadly, I will not download
the code due to the aformentioned disk space issues. Will there be a way to
give one of you the manual differences so you will commit them in the right
places?
☆PhistucK
2009/5/6 Jeremy Orlow jor...@google.com
The
We should be careful about adding non-standard APIs to the Web
platform. If we want to make this available to every Web site, we
should first standardized the API through W3C.
Adam
2009/5/6 Jeremy Orlow jor...@google.com:
The JavaScript bindings are (mostly) generated from .idl files found
Or sending an email to the WhatWG (wha...@lists.whatwg.org). Unfortunately,
things are tightening up on the HTML 5 spec. I think this might be too big
of a change to get in at this point.
Anyhow, I've heard arguments both ways. Some people think we should not let
the standards keep us from
On 6-May-09, at 3:30 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
Anyhow, I've heard arguments both ways. Some people think we should
not let the standards keep us from experimenting (and then raising
the topics with the standards group later) and some people think
it's better to bring up the idea and
Agreed. It's also worth pointing out that the context of this started out
as an API for the add-on/extension system and evolved into an API that might
be more broadly available.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Mike Beltzner beltz...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 6-May-09, at 3:30 PM, Jeremy Orlow
Yes, this is a known issue. I've created a bug that you can track if
you're interested:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=11547
- a
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, jack js2...@gmail.com wrote:
The phenomenon is quite simple: the addon code may not be loaded
(quite random)
Thanks for letting me know.
BTW I will try the trick (bookmarking for local storage) you suggested
in the mean time for user preferences.
-Jack
On May 6, 12:57 pm, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
Yes, this is a known issue. I've created a bug that you can track if
you're interested:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Mike Beltzner beltz...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 6-May-09, at 3:30 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
Anyhow, I've heard arguments both ways. Some people think we should not
let the standards keep us from experimenting (and then raising the topics
with the standards group
[It seems that I can only post in the group, instead of replying in
gmail, to have my reply posted here. So apologize if you already
received this before. ]
Thanks for all of your inputs. My previous example (gmail addon) might
be misleading. Let's say the popular ad block. Ad block should be
Maybe the thing to do is to have some kind of WebKit namespace for
experimental JavaScript APIs, in the same way there is
-webkit-border-radius for CSS. Something like:
window.onIdleWebKit
or
window.onIdleWK
Adam
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
On
Can anyone think of a reason this might be happening?
Is there any more info he could provide that could help figure it out?
-Nick
-- Forwarded message --
Kirill - thanks for the intro.
Nick - I just wanted to follow up on that strange issue with Chrome I
mentioned when we last
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:10 PM, jack js2...@gmail.com wrote:
[It seems that I can only post in the group, instead of replying in
gmail, to have my reply posted here. So apologize if you already
received this before. ]
Thanks for all of your inputs. My previous example (gmail addon) might
Something lazy-loaded after renderer start blocks system IO looking for a
nonexistent DLL or network drive or something? I dunno, I'd try and trace
what the IO calls being made are.
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
Blargh.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@google.com wrote:
Aaron, what's the plan for extensions using localStorage and databases. I
assume they'll each have their own origin that's independent of what
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Nick Baum nickb...@chromium.org wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
Kirill - thanks for the intro.
Nick - I just wanted to follow up on that strange issue with Chrome I
mentioned when we last talked. When I load Chrome, the favorites boxes load
I think this is a pretty reasonable idea. Also the extension system
can serve as a test bed for ideas.
- a
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
Maybe the thing to do is to have some kind of WebKit namespace for
experimental JavaScript APIs, in the same way
http://dev.chromium.org/developers now links to a Using Valgrind page
which is supposed to be all you need to know to be a valgrind hero.
It's not quite as complete as the Using Purify page, but it's close.
Let me know if there are unclear or missing bits you'd like clarified.
thestig is
I just committed a change that removes all usage of
NotificationService from views/. Please do not add new usages. If you
need a notification reconsider your design or find some other way to
communicate. NotificationService is highly dependent on a
chrome-specific enumeration of notification
I just wanted to give you heads up that soon it will be time for me to
devote most of my time on the second part of the Feed handling support in
Chrome, namely: Feed Previews (
http://dev.chromium.org/user-experience/feed-subscriptions).
Consider this a request for your feedback, especially if
The way that makes most sense to me to implement this in the
extensions system is:
a) In C++ use content sniffing to make sure that the content type is
always correct for feeds
b) Add a feature to content scripts in extensions, so that they can
match by content type
c) Have a content script that
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Finnur Thorarinsson fin...@chromium.org wrote:
I have already added an API for PageActions and have a working RSS
PageAction extension, which does feed auto-detection on the page. Now it is
time to look into Feed previews.
I have spoken briefly to AdamB and
Why bother with view-feed://? Why not just have the feed be styled
more nicely, similar to the way that XML is styled more nicely by
default in most browsers?
- a
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Finnur Thorarinsson
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
- Some existing practice on the web is to use
feed://hostname/etc.xml, which drops the protocol (and should be
interpreted as HTTP). Ideally you should redirect these into
view-feed:http://hostname/etc.xml so our view-feed
I think Darin had some strong opinions about whether we should do
nested schemes like feed-view:http://foo.com/bar.
From a security point of view, we'd ideally like to render feeds with
JavaScript and plug-ins disabled, as well as in a noAccess
SecurityOrigin. This is easier if the feed preview
WebKit does not support nested schemes. It would fail in so many places to
recognize that the authority of such an URL is actually foo.com.
(However, we could perhaps support this as we do view-source, where WebKit
never actually sees the view-source URL.)
-Darin
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:56
On 6-May-09, at 9:56 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
From a security point of view, we'd ideally like to render feeds with
JavaScript and plug-ins disabled, as well as in a noAccess
SecurityOrigin. This is easier if the feed preview lives in its own
scheme. I'm happy to help out with the security
I don't think we want these feed previews to run with foo.com's
authority. I'd rather they ran with no one's authority.
Adam
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
WebKit does not support nested schemes. It would fail in so many places to
recognize that the
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Mike Beltzner beltz...@mozilla.com wrote:
FWIW, Firefox has had several security issues crop up with the mixed-content
feed preview implementation. Placing privileged controls so close to web
content should be avoided, IMO, if you want to keep this from being a
50 matches
Mail list logo
