Yeah, I feel your pain. I'm dealing with a related issue at the moment
getting clarification on whether a Netopia SDSL router will, or will not,
form a peer IPSEC/3DES tunnel with a Cisco router. I haven't had a chance
to test yet, but I'm hearing mixed answers. It just seems to me that if
I have a cisco router 3640 with 8AM for callback by PSTN.
configuration as follow:
(IOS ver.12.1.T5)
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default local
aaa authentication ppp default local
aaa authorization network default local
enable secret 5
!
username *password *
username
Wallace Lee wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hunt,
I guess you don't have the 203.147.154.0 route in the middle router.
however, you have a
defaut route in it. So, you will experience a routing loop. Check you
tunnel
configuration as well. see the following from
Firstly, I must say thank you so much for getting back to me :-)
Sorry about this, but the network is actually like this:
Gw1.bne2 - Gw2.bne Gw1.bne MLS2 (cat
6500) - Avior (Linux)
|
|
Hi friends,
one of the question in an interview which I cudnt ans, i am just putting it
across for your advise.
There are 2 Domains
a. x.domain1.com - DNS server (10.10.1.100)- one of the host ip is 10.10.1.1
(name: uranes.domain1.com)
holds Ip address segment seperated by say 10.10.1.0/24
LOL. Actually the policies are quite similar, Gaz however its all
discretionary. People will talk regardless. If someone is inclined to talk
then they are inclined to ramble on about clearances et al. For what its
with, its not as though when a clearance is issued they hand you a plac and
Hi Murali,
what you want to do is basically to connect two networks with totally
overlapped address ranges. At first you need NAT in order to separate both
networks with the same IP address space. To do this, you need virtual
address spaces which you'll use to address your remote 10.10.1.0/24
The following mail can't be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: or organization must not sell ot donate this
The attachment is the original mail
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42643t=42643
Hello,
Does anyone of you have an overview of all the default settings specified
per IOS version? I am reffering to all the configuration options which are
switched on by default but not showing up in the configuration when you do
a sh run.
thanks for your reply,
Koen Zeilstra
Legian
Have you tried the IPSec that is built into windows 2000?
Daniel Ladrach
CCNA, CCNP
WorldCom
-Original Message-
From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Alternatives to Cisco VPN client [7:42604]
I
To elaborate more from my first posting. I believe companies like Nortel
with their later releases in OS have incorporated the ability to use Windows
IPsec.
Daniel Ladrach
CCNA, CCNP
WorldCom
-Original Message-
From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26,
Does anybody have these CCIE NET QS questions for trade? Has anyone used em
and are they any good?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42648t=42648
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
This isn't really what I'm after. However, as a temporary measure, I
decided to enable it and test.
I enabled it and still can't get access to the Internet. Further, when I
look at the statistics of the connection, it shows LAN access as disabled,
even though I have it enabled in the
Craig,
Go to www.cyclades.com . They offer linux based remote access and terminal
which will probably cheaper than the Cisco versions.
gr,
K.
Koen Zeilstra
Legian
---
Coward, n.:
One who in a perilous emergency thinks with his legs.
-- Ambrose
Dear members,
I would like to ask about the rumour I heard regarding
Catalyst Switch 8540. According to the rumour Cat 8540
is a big failure product of Cisco switch line-up.
I have a catalog of Catalyst switches, this 8540 is not
shown on the catalog. Does anyone have information or
an
Craig,
I have done quite a bit of research in this area, and I'm pretty confident
that no product exists that does what your looking for. There are plenty of
client side products that can simply peer with an IPSec gateway using a
shared secret or even a certificate, but as far as I have seen
Can someone tell me what the passing score is on the CCIE written part of
the beta exam? Also, how many times can you take it and do you have to wait
a period of time in between taking it?
TIA,
JunoGuy
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42653t=42653
I think it relates to the fact that ICMP uses TYPES rather than PORTS.
Though it still uses source and destination IP address, ports are not used,
so the whole source port thing doesn't really make sense with ICMP. There
really is no source type, so they don't have granularity on the source
Guys,
I am studying about TokenRing, RIFs, etc, and I have a question. Let's get
Rossi's paper, per example, using the ilustration o question 20.
Host A - Ring 25 - Bridge 11 - VRing 10 - Bridge 14 - Ring 35 - Host B
Assuming that Host A is sending a packet to Host B, the RIF should look
Thanks for the reply! Good point about the router ID. After the first
response, I began playing with the OSPF router-id command, and
subsequently discovered that the virtual-link must be defined as terminating
at the router-id, and not the physical interface or in any specific area.
As far as
Are the standby groups working (show standby)?
Make sure you are not running an internal routing protocol on the HSRP
interfaces.
--
AS#13407
Joel Panetta wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
When adding hsrp does my default gateway become what is now my virtual
Guess that sums up my question. Think I remember a reference a while back
in one post that it was able to do ISDN BRI. Thanks
Stephen
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42660t=42660
--
FAQ, list archives, and
Guys,
I have a global financial company that is upgrading their core data
infrastructure (bunch of 7200's and 6509's, etc), opening up 150 remote
locations over the next few years, going all IP telephony with Call Mangers
and now wants to encrypt ALL traffic to all sites. I know site-to -site
You didn't muddy them half as much as I did!
I think mine ranks up with my most inaccurate post ever. Unfortunately, I
answered with the junk that I had in my mind, which for creating
access-lists and configuring firewall rule bases has always been close
enough to allow things to work (even if
This method really helped me, it takes decimal to binary to hex conversion
and back again. As long as you can do decimal to binary and you know the
first line hex conversion you are set ...
the example will probably make more sense than the instructions.
The method (thanks Dennis)
step 1:
sat the ol' BCRAN test today. 77 ?'s, 690 to pass, and 90 minutes. lots of
commands and a pretty even test as far as the technologies go. i got an
841.not too shabby.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42664t=42664
Looks like you are definately receiving default from your providers.
If I remember correctly though your big concern was incoming traffic not
outgoing. Like I mentioned in my previous email you need to talk to
your providers and find out how they are announcing your address space.
For example
The whole 8500 series never really took off, the used market pricing for
that stuff vs. retail is unreal
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Engelhard M. Labiro wrote:
Dear members,
I would like to ask about the rumour I heard regarding
Catalyst Switch 8540. According to the rumour Cat 8540
is a big
Group,
Watch your addressing you use when practicing. The IP addressing I used for
my
last lab was very similar to the lab and caused problems. I had to re-addr
interfaces with the correct network more then a few times. And since I didn't
create the IP addressing scheme, I had to keep flipping
what's the security risk?
(putting on learning cap now... :) )
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Louie Belt
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Alternatives to Cisco VPN client [7:42604]
Limiting the bandwidth for RTP makes sense for voice, which uses very
little bandwidth. Maybe that's what the developers of the command had in
mind, rather than video. 2 Mbps would be a lot of compressed voice streams.
Depending on the CODEC, a single voice stream might just require 8 Kbps. 2
Theses seem to conflict. Is there some historical eveolution htat aloows
them both to be true at different times on different platforms?
1) Just remember if you run CEF on this router or fast switching (as you
should) it will process switch if you apply access-lists to interfaces.
2) Actually
JunoGuy wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Can someone tell me what the passing score is on the CCIE written part of
the beta exam? Also, how many times can you take it and do you have to
wait
a period of time in between taking it?
I don't think we'll know the
today). However in my studying (and since I only have current CCIE study
materials and practice exams) I think I may be ready to take the current
written. If I were to take and pass the current written, then a few days
later take the beta and not pass, would that discount my passing of the
Check
sh ip bgp neigh 63.122.163.89 routes
sh ip bgp neigh 63.122.163.89 advertised-routes
sh ip bgp neigh 63.122.163.93 routes
sh ip bgp neigh 63.122.163.93 advertised-routes
If results of both above commands same, then check for following
statement in bgp configuration
maximum-paths 2
8540 is very expensive compared to the 6500 series which has most of the
features as 8540 and is way cheaper then the 8540, the 6500 series is
preferred more. You can substitute the 8540 with a 6500 series.
I'll like to know more about it too...
Simer
-Original Message-
From:
I thought I was actually asking a CISCO syntax question but the ICMP
discussion turned out to be very educational as I thought I understood ICMP
but in fact was really not clear on the relationship of the echo and
echo-reply. It sounds like it is fairly primitve and straight forward. THank
you
Hi all,
I can't connect to my internal web server from outside even though I put in
the IP NAT.. command. Is there anything else I missed? Please let me know.
Here is the command I put in the c2600 router:
ip nat inside source static tcp 10.0.0.5 80 141.155.121.134 80 extendable
Thanks
IP NAT INSIDE on the 10.0.0.x interface and IP NAT OUTSIDE on the
141.155.121.x interface.
Anthony Pace
Ricky Chan wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all,
I can't connect to my internal web server from outside even though I put
in
the IP NAT.. command. Is
At 1:58 PM -0400 4/26/02, Anthony Pace wrote:
Theses seem to conflict. Is there some historical eveolution htat aloows
them both to be true at different times on different platforms?
1) Just remember if you run CEF on this router or fast switching (as you
should) it will process switch if you
Congrats! I'm going to sit it myself soon, without breaking the NDA was it
similar to BSCN ie: pick from list of cmds and enter yada,yada. How about
the dilaer cmds, AAA, 700 - I'm hoping those aren't on the test that much. TIA
Message Posted at:
If I wanted to connect 2 Cisco 3550 switches together, would I need 1
Gigabit stacking GBIC or 2? I think I need 2 of them. I am trying to
find out exactly what I need to hook together (2) 3350 (24 port) with 2
GIG ports. The part number im looking at is CIS-WS-X3500-XL, is this
all I would
The main problem I've been having deals with congestion and transfer rates.
When taking a shower longer than 5 minutes the pipeline by the drain gets
flooded with traffic and the water gets queued up.The rate at which water
enters the tub and leaves through the pipeline is disproportionate and
I am about to finish mine up. This was alot harder
than my routing switching CCNP or even the CCIE
Written but thats just my opinion.
Here are the following Exams
DQOS = Quality of Service exam
CIPT = Cisco IP Telephone ( Call Manager 3.1)
IPTT = IP Telephony Trouvleshooting
Telephony
Since everyone is here to help others out, I will do the same:
Do *NOT* pay more than $20.00 for DTE DCE back to back crossover cables
(shipping included). You can get them from eBay for that price or less. I
bought a few for that price and less. Example:
h*t*://w*w.anthonypanda.c*m
has them
a PC directly connected to the internet at the same time it is directly
connected to a corporate network via a VPN allows a malicious user to
compromise the pc in any number of well known ways, and thus gain control of
the PC and voila! have instant access to the corporate net as well - through
a
I would like to say that I've browsed through many news and web groups, but
you guys are the top I've seen. I find myself being intimidated reading
your indepth responses.
I finished up my CCNP last week and finished my CCDA exam this morning. I
plan on sitting the CCDP exam in 2 weeks and
I've had to do a bit of reading on this myself lately. Recently several
engineers at my place of employment were yakking about this and there is a
lot of mis-information and misunderstanding. none of us really understood
how the gigastack worked.
check out the following link:
I think the answer is in here:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca3500xl/prodlit/gbic_ds.htm
Dave
Brian Zeitz wrote:
If I wanted to connect 2 Cisco 3550 switches together, would I need 1
Gigabit stacking GBIC or 2? I think I need 2 of them. I am trying to
find out exactly
Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, what are other
good alternatives for the 2900XL series?
I have a client with a small network about 100 users. At present the
internal network is @ 10MB/s and will be upgrading to 100MB/s. There are 2
file servers, 2 app servers and
Best to post your network topology.
-Original Message-
From: sam sneed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: congestion down main pipeline [7:42681]
The main problem I've been having deals with congestion and
transfer
do great minds think alike, or what ;-
( see my response to the same question )
Chuck
P.S. happy Friday, everyone.
MADMAN wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I think the answer is in here:
Does anyone know a cheap rack that has a 3920 in it? I just want to fiddle
with the vlan config, telnet and ping. Ideas?!?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42690t=42690
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
Try removing the default routing statement from Gw2.bne cause that looks
like a potential cause.
Also, you said that the network statements you added were not in the routing
table for gw2.bne.
Can you also post a show ip route for gw2.bne?
Another interesting question is why gw1.bne doesnt see
Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so,
what are other
good alternatives for the 2900XL series?
3500XL
Marko.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42693t=42687
--
FAQ, list archives,
If you want your VPN client to have Internet connectivity while VPN
tunnel is up, the solutions is the split tunnel configuration.
PIX will push an access-list to a client, so only traffic between your
private networks will flow through the tunnel, but the rest will go out
to the Internet
Good luck!! I've got it a week from today. (one more week to cram my
pea brain full of stuff!!)
Mike W.
dre wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
JunoGuy wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Can someone tell me what the passing score
I use a newsgroup reader at home and the web forum at work either way I
get the full threads and can send posts =)
If you see a post with [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's one that I posted via the
web. All the rest (like this one) are posted via Outlook Express.
If you reply to a post via the
sure, but taking that less than secure computer, and hooking up to your
corporate network, opens the corporate network to backdoor access from the
internet. hence the advisability of disabling split tunneling during VPN
connectivity to corporate nets.
it's not an IPSec issue. It's a best
2950 XL replaced 2900 and 3550 XL replaced 3500. The 2900 and 3500's got
EOL'd .
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com
Mayo, Simer wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, what are other
I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, however, I know Cisco is
pushing the 2950 series is a newer alternative The 2950s feature Gig
uplinks and 2900s don't
Same with 3500s and 3550 (well the 3500's do have GBICs slots available, but
I mean the same as far as Cisco pushing them as
Can a FastEthernet port of a router trunk 150-200 devices spread out over a
few VLAN's? I'm going to assume yes, but at what point to you have to go
router on a blade, generally speaking.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com
MADMAN wrote in message
[EMAIL
Yeah... Groupstudy rocks!!! Best group I've found on the web or
otherwise When you got people like Howard Berkowitz, Priscilla
Oppenheimer, the oldest CCNP on earth, and of course, ME (LOL) lurking in
the shadows, you'll almost always find a good discussion about RTP priority
Inline
Michael L. Williams wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted,
The fixed-config ones have absolutely been discontinued
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca2900xl/prodlit/1421_pp.htm
however, I know Cisco is
Marko Milivojevic wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so,
what are other
good alternatives for the 2900XL series?
3500XL
Uh, are you sure?
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca3500xl/
Marko.
Steven A. Ridder wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
2950 XL replaced 2900 and 3550 XL replaced 3500. The 2900 and 3500's got
EOL'd .
There is no such thing as a 2950XL or a 3550XL. The 'XL' designation only
exists for the 2900 and the 3500.
--
RFC 1149
I remembered studying these such models in differential equations
class.. what you need to do is to increase the rate of change in the
water in the exit queue (which you already indicated by trying the most
popular methods of draino, etc).
About all you could do is use some kind of policing
I picked up a CPA 2514 PRO cheap on Ebay and it will take 16mb of
DRAM, but won't see the 16 mb of flash ( 2 8mb flash).
I remember reading something that said I need to have bootstrap 11 or
something, but I don't have it.
How do I chip it up? Is there older memory for this, and will it take
If I remember correctly, you have to pick from a list of about 80-100
commands and then type the command exactly as shown in the command exhibit.
This is probably 40% of the exam. AAA was covered, but not much. You'll
probably need to know how the 700 series routers are positioned in the
market
On Sep 16, 1:23pm, Michael L. Williams wrote:
}
} I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, however, I know Cisco is
What you think is irrelevant! The last of the 2900XL series were
discontinued on Nov. 1st, 2001. Next time, instead of thinking, go
look at http://www.cisco.com/go/eol/
You could buy a 3920 simulator software package for about 75 but I wouldn't
recommend it, I prefer to have routers to test different setups with. You
could go on ebay and look for 3920 scenario, there is a person named Bernard
that sells them for under 30 and he sets you up on the switch with a
the 2950 series has somewhat replaced the 2924xl.
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Marko Milivojevic
To:
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:29 PM
Subject: RE: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]
Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so,
Another thing to consider about the 2950's, which may or may not be
important to you, is they do not support ISL.
-Ed
At 06:47 PM 4/26/2002 -0400, Michael L. Williams wrote:
I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, however, I know Cisco is
pushing the 2950 series is a newer
They are in the process of disco'ing the 2900 series but they have already
come out with its successor - the 2950 series. (they also have the 3550
series as well).
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/ca2950ie.htm
Adam Hickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Marko
I was wondering if there was ever any kind of study done by Cisco to
determine the acceptable average level of processor utilization on their
equipment. How much is too much on, let's say, a 3524 switch, or a 7513
router? I am sure it varies, but is there a list of some sort that states
that at
What kind of router? What kind of traffic?
I have installed quite a few 2621's doing trunking on FA0/0 (dot1q) for
inter-vlan routing with client numbers in the range you refer to. Mainly IP
traffic, some limited IPX.
Hope this helps.
Message Posted at:
sam sneed wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The main problem I've been having deals with congestion and transfer
rates.
When taking a shower longer than 5 minutes the pipeline by the drain gets
flooded with traffic and the water gets queued up.The rate at which
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth) wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Sep 16, 1:23pm, Michael L. Williams wrote:
}
} I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, however, I know Cisco is
What you think is irrelevant! The last of the 2900XL series were
Need some help. I got it up and running but can't seem to connect to a
port through reverse telnet.
I can telnet into the server at 192.168.1.101:2000 but can't get to
192.168.1.101:2200
My cable going from the server to the console port on my Cisco 2501
looks like this:
1-1
2-n/c
Well I received the motherboard and everything came right up. I now have a
home-built pix to use for studyingI am using the Intel Nics, Intel MB
and a Pix 2meg flash card.
Thanks all!
Don
Well all I am waiting for is the Intel motherboard. I should have it some
time next week. I will be
First off, let me pre-apologize for my following statements to everyone in
this group except Mr. Know It All (John Nemeth)... The following is
slightly unprofessional, but well deserved.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth) wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Guys,
I have a EICON DIVA LAN ISDN BRI Modem
(http://www.eicon.com/worldwide/products/ISDN/divalan.htm)
dial-up to internet and all my workstation are able to surf net.
But once I secure the VPN connectivity to my HQ on every workstation, the
local and destination LAN was lost.
If I by pass
If memory serves, 75% is where Cisco likes to draw the line. From an online
CCDA study guide No Cisco router CPU utilization should exceed 75 percent
You could do either one you choose (replace with better/faster equipment or
simply shift some of the load to other equipment). I can't say if
At 7:37 PM -0400 4/26/02, Lupi, Guy wrote:
I was wondering if there was ever any kind of study done by Cisco to
determine the acceptable average level of processor utilization on their
equipment. How much is too much on, let's say, a 3524 switch, or a 7513
router? I am sure it varies, but is
4/26/2002 8:40pm Friday
I have a Cisco term server here @ home the syntax is 192.168.1.101 2200
(space --- no : )
Steve Watson wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Need some help. I got it up and running but can't seem to connect to a
port through reverse
Michael L. Williams wrote:
no one can no everything
And yes, after posting I realized that I misspelled no in the above
sentence. I wanted to make it known that I made a mistake before Mr. Nemeth
had a chance to chime in with a standard yeah, well, learn how to spell...
posts.
Mike W.
I put the 75% threshold for max average router CPU utilization into my
Designing Cisco Networks Version 1.0 class without doing a formal study of
any sort, and then it got emblazoned in stone for the CCDA test. ;-) I
couldn't get a straight answer out of TAC or the software or hardware
engineers
Geez...all you guys had to do was ask! ;-}
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Gigabit GBIC for 3550 [7:42680]
do great minds think alike, or what ;-
( see my response to the same
Jeez John I can't wait to know everything like you!!
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth) wrote:
On Sep 16, 1:23pm, Michael L. Williams wrote:
}
} I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, however, I know Cisco is
What you think is irrelevant! The last of the 2900XL series
Not to be evasive but it depends. In some scenerios 150 heavy users could
kill the
router but then again if the users are using simple keystroke, screen update
type apps
then a couple hundred would be no problem.
Dave
Steven A. Ridder wrote:
Can a FastEthernet port of a router trunk
I ran into a similar problem using the TFTP server offered by Cisco. I have
been using the 3-Com suite, which includes FTP/TFTP server and client, as
well as a syslog server.
ftp://ftp.3com.com/pub/utilbin/win32/3cdv2r10.zip
This is a Win based program.
Hope this helps.
Daniel Cotts wrote:
Priscilla,
Your not alone. I also read the messages of this list via e-mail. Kinda
gets crazy sometimes, because I trie to read 99% of the messages.
When the messages come down, I'll sometimes get the messages in a wierd
order that doesn't seem chronological, but yet the time stamps are in
You can get free bootroms from Cisco. The CPA 2514 takes the same flash and
dram as the other 2500 series routers.
After you upgrade the bootroms and the memory, you will need to run a
cookie file on your router. Check the groupstudy archives, it's been
talked about plenty over the years.
4/26/2002 8:40pm Friday
I bought that sim from Bernard a while back It's great if you do not have
the real thing.
I bought my own 3920 a few months ago for my home lab I can tell you they
are a pain to work with !!!
Rumor was that a 128 meg version (high speed token ring) was in the works
94 matches
Mail list logo
