Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 800 stops forwarding layer 3 via switchport

On Tuesday, 10 November 2009 at K:13:13 -0600, Jesse Alexander wrote: I have seen this issue happen with a customer 800 series, and I think there were just too many IP's for it to handle. If I remember correctly, they were using an 871. In my case, we think it couldn't handle a /22 (I think

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 800 stops forwarding layer 3 via switchport

On Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at K:04:55 +, Paul Cosgrove wrote: Not personally, but I have heard of similar issues which affect old versions of the PIX software. Does disabling/enabling or disconnecting/reconnecting the interface also resolve the issue? Sadly not that I'm aware

[c-nsp] (multi chass)i mc lag feature 7600

Hi, Has anyone any information about when the 7600 will support mc-lag? //Niklas ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] (multi chass)i mc lag feature 7600

ES cards under SRE are supposed to support it. -- Tassos niklas rehnberg wrote on 12/11/2009 14:27: Hi, Has anyone any information about when the 7600 will support mc-lag? //Niklas ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] Fiber

I need to know your opinion about fiber to desk i.e. pros and cons.. Thanks in advance. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Fiber

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, madunix wrote: I need to know your opinion about fiber to desk i.e. pros and cons.. Fiber is much more sensitive to dust, bending and other kind of things that might happen day-to-day with people who don't really know or care about data communication. It's also more

Re: [c-nsp] Fiber

madunix wrote: I need to know your opinion about fiber to desk i.e. pros and cons.. Thanks in advance. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

[c-nsp] WDM Splitter

Guys, Has anyone used one of these WDM splitter cables from cisco (WDM-1300-1550-S)? https://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps5455/ps6575/product_data_sheet0900aecd8029d01b_ps708_Products_Data_Sheet.html If I'm reading the data sheet correctly, since it splits off the 1300 and 1550

Re: [c-nsp] Fiber

On 12/11/2009 13:24, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: Why would you want to do it? I don't really see any pros what so ever to do it. it's useful if you want 10G to the desk. Otherwise, it's too fragile and sensitive for the average office environment. Nick

Re: [c-nsp] Fiber

where you're not allowed copper, like oil refineries where copper cable won't work due to massive interference where you must have runs to desktops that are over 90m (tho I've some long runs on cat6 that work at 100M, just keep them below 200m, and use quality cable) Now that 10G over

[c-nsp] L2TP Configuration Debugging

Hello, I am attempting to help a customer debug an interconnect issue on his L2TP configuration. Unfortunately, this particular customer is not very Cisco savvy, and I am not very L2TP on Cisco savvy, so I would like to recruit someone for an hour (paid) to assist in debugging this tunnel

[c-nsp] SP QoS Service Class

I'm trying to plan for a QoS implementation for an Internet Access provider. I just finished reading RFC 4594 and it recommends VoIP signalling traffic be marked CS5. Every other reference I have seen always has it at AF31 or CS3. Is anyone else using the RFC recommendation? Would any SP be

Re: [c-nsp] Fiber

am just trying to take advantage of using light technologies in LAN for our new building, due to long distance between the offices over 90m, i know fiber is fast expensive and copper gigabit still far cheaper, and fiber to desktop isn't required for a majority of applications. Thanks On Thu, Nov

Re: [c-nsp] L2TP Configuration Debugging

Gregory, Please drop me a line with the configuration of the router acting as PPPoE client and the router acting as the LNS. Also, please detail what is in the RADIUS profile (if a AAA server is being used). No promises but I'll check it over and offer up some suggestions if I have any. Best

Re: [c-nsp] Fiber

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 madunix wrote: I need to know your opinion about fiber to desk i.e. pros and cons.. Thanks in advance. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Fiber

it's useful if you want 10G to the desk. Otherwise, it's too fragile and sensitive for the average office environment. Maybe plastic optical fibers are not so fragile/sensitive, but I haven't seen them in production John ___ cisco-nsp mailing

Re: [c-nsp] WDM Splitter

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Shaw wrote: Guys, Has anyone used one of these WDM splitter cables from cisco (WDM-1300-1550-S)? https://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps5455/ps6575/product_data_sheet0900aecd8029d01b_ps708_Products_Data_Sheet.html If

Re: [c-nsp] Fiber

On Thursday 12 November 2009 09:10:02 pm madunix wrote: I need to know your opinion about fiber to desk i.e. pros and cons.. I tend to agree with Matthew and the others that have commented on this. The issue of distance and bandwidth notwithstanding, we've experienced situations where

Re: [c-nsp] Fiber

I need to know your opinion about fiber to desk i.e. pros and cons.. If one needs fiber for distance, electrical isolation, limited space/cooling for access switches, etc., one may want to look at various FTTx technologies (xPON and friends) which can provide fiber to near the desk with a

Re: [c-nsp] Fiber

On Friday 13 November 2009 12:12:47 am madunix wrote: am just trying to take advantage of using light technologies in LAN for our new building, due to long distance between the offices over 90m, i know fiber is fast expensive and copper gigabit still far cheaper, and fiber to desktop isn't

[c-nsp] Client-to-client wireless on 877W

Does anyone know offhand how to enable local wireless bridge (client to client communication) on the radio on a Cisco 877W? I swear I thought I saw it in the docs somewhere a year ago when I set this thing up, but for the life of me I can't find it now or I'm not searching for whatever Cisco likes

Re: [c-nsp] SP QoS Service Class

Travis, This map has worked pretty well for us. The idea behind splitting out RTP from signaling is if signaling doesn't get through, the call will drop. I welcome constructive criticism. :) class-map match-any Core_Voice_Signaling match access-group name Core_Voice_Signaling class-map

[c-nsp] C6K, SUP720, 12.2(33)SXI, CoPP, glean

Anyone know how glean traffic behaves on a Sup720 with CoPP configured? We have gradually locked down our CoPP config, to the point that our final class is a default deny for any unclassified traffic. Unfortunately this has the unwanted side-effect of dropping glean traffic, with the knock-on

[c-nsp] MAC address use on 7600

Hi group, Can someone explain why router 7600 uses the same MAC address for all VLAN interfaces and ES20 ports? Catalyst 3560 has different MAC address for each VLAN interface. Thanks, Rin ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] 3750G vs. Nexus for a SAN

It is on the price list. $5300.. I have on in production and one on order for a customer.. Nice switch... Jim -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 9:31

[c-nsp] router boots into ROMMON

My 7600 boots ignores the boot statement and goes into ROMMON. From ROMMON I can boot with following command: rommon 2 * boot bootdisk:c7600s72033-ipservices-mz.122-33.SRD.bin* rommon 1 set PS1=rommon ! LOG_PREFIX_VERSION=1 CONFIG_FILE= SWITCH_NUMBER=0 SLOTCACHE=cards;

Re: [c-nsp] router boots into ROMMON

Config register looks fine. Most obvious thing would be that the bin file doesn't exist. What does dir sup-bootdisk:c7600s72033-ipservices-mz.122-33.SRD.bin return? Does the file exist? selamat pagi wrote: My 7600 boots ignores the boot statement and goes into ROMMON. From ROMMON I can

Re: [c-nsp] 3750G vs. Nexus for a SAN

What version of IOS does it run ? Base version or lite version ? Wim Holemans Network Services University of Antwerp -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jim McBurnett Sent: vrijdag 13 november 2009 5:17 To: