Re: [c-nsp] sup 720 3c 10GE blades for 7600

2009-04-28 Thread Mark Boolootian
> AFAIK there are some issues when using the the RSP720-10G in redundant > configurations. Thats the statement we know, why the RSP is not yet > general orderable. Do you have any details on the types of issues? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@p

Re: [c-nsp] sup 720 3c 10GE blades for 7600

2009-04-28 Thread Matthew Huff
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Huff > Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 4:00 PM > To: 'Cisco Nsp' > Subject: [c-nsp] sup 720 3c 10GE blades for 7600 > > Our cisco rep and var are pushing back

Re: [c-nsp] sup 720 3c 10GE blades for 7600

2009-04-28 Thread Michel Renfer
Matthew Huff Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 4:00 PM To: 'Cisco Nsp' Subject: [c-nsp] sup 720 3c 10GE blades for 7600 Our cisco rep and var are pushing back on our plans to upgrade our 7600 from sup32 to the RSP 720 with 10GE saying they are in limited production. Of course, they are

[c-nsp] sup 720 3c 10GE blades for 7600

2009-04-28 Thread Matthew Huff
Our cisco rep and var are pushing back on our plans to upgrade our 7600 from sup32 to the RSP 720 with 10GE saying they are in limited production. Of course, they are pushing us toward the ASR product line. Anyone know of any issues with the RSP 720 w 10GE interfaces? Matthew Huff   | On