Re: [c-nsp] 12.4(11)T QoS problems (again)

2007-07-27 Thread Rodney Dunn
I'd be interested to know this as well. I helped draft the FN on this one to make sure they were clear. In the fixes that went in 15T1 there was really only one, rather large, change to improve the dataplane performance. Others were mostly bug functionality problems. The NPE-G2 performance

Re: [c-nsp] Dual-Homed VPLS

2007-07-27 Thread Peter Krupl
Hi, I have looked at this issue too, but your solution has one major flaw... Q: What would happen if the VPLS circuits go down in the core network, And then came back up ? A: You have a loop, until spanning tree notices Flexlink seems more usable Med venlig hilsen/Kind regards Peter

Re: [c-nsp] Dual-Homed VPLS

2007-07-27 Thread Tim Durack
Disclaimer: I've only read about this. If you can do H-VPLS with u-PE/n-PE Cisco talks about EE H-VPLS Pseudo-n-PE Redundancy being a way to avoid some of the loop-avaoidance issues. See this link: http://cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/products_white_paper09186a00801f6084.shtml

Re: [c-nsp] T1 to Ethernet Tunnel

2007-07-27 Thread Robert Blayzor
Joe Maimon wrote: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1829/products_feature_guide09186a00801b2407.html If you can use ppp or hdlc, surely you can do frame relay as well. Yes, indeed. However I'd have to make sure the customers equipment would support that also. We're not

Re: [c-nsp] T1 to Ethernet Tunnel

2007-07-27 Thread Joe Maimon
Robert Blayzor wrote: Joe Maimon wrote: Frame-Relay to Ethernet interworking is available in 12.411T IIRC. What about HDLC or PPP? This will not be a frame T1. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1829/products_feature_guide09186a00801b2407.html If you can use ppp or

Re: [c-nsp] Dual-Homed VPLS

2007-07-27 Thread alaerte.vidali
The idea sounds nice, but did you see the drawbacks? I think I will end up using 2 extended Vlans per customer, so we have the benefits of layer 3 redundancy without the concerns of Spanning Tree and will get some load balancing. Something like this: Site 1

[c-nsp] Distributed Director functionality

2007-07-27 Thread Peter Nyamukusa
Hi folks, I am trying to run the Distributed Director functionality on a 2610 router with 8 MB flash according to the software requirements below I would need IOS 12.2 (1) or higher with Plus feature-set. I downloaded 12.2 but unfortunately the min requirements for running this are 16MB of flash.

[c-nsp] Problem using SNMPget for ipAdEntIfIndex and IfIndex (7600, 3660, 7200)

2007-07-27 Thread Anton Smith
Hi all, the following is on behalf of a work mate: Problem using SNMPget for ipAdEntIfIndex and IfIndex on Cisco 7600/3660/7200: It regards getting information on what ipaddress is connected to what interface. I use ipAdEntIfIndex to find out what ipaddress goes with what

Re: [c-nsp] T1 to Ethernet Tunnel

2007-07-27 Thread Joe Maimon
Frame-Relay to Ethernet interworking is available in 12.411T IIRC. Robert Blayzor wrote: I have a unique situation where a customer needs a point-to-point link. However the media on both ends is not the same. On one end we have can only do T1, on the other side, Ethernet. As the

[c-nsp] PVDM2-24DM with a VWIC2-2MFT-T1?

2007-07-27 Thread Nate Carlson
We're currently using a AS5300 for dial-in services, and would like to move this over to a 3825 that we have sitting mainly idle. It looks like the PVDM2-24DM would provide the digital modems we need; however, we already have a VWIC2-2MFT-T1 installed in the 3825, and would like to use that if

[c-nsp] VPN mode Bridge

2007-07-27 Thread Jorge Evangelista
Hi, Is there anyway for deploy a VPN in mode bridge with Cisco 851 or other models?, I want to deploy a VPN where I want have some hosts inside the same subnet of main office, I have read that it is possible with OpenVPN and Linux (http://www.linux.com/articles/58336). I do not want to use NAT

[c-nsp] Cisco PIX VPN address pool

2007-07-27 Thread Scott Klassen
Pix 605. Two questions: I have a small reserved set of addresses set in the PIX for a few people who use IPSEC VPN. At least one of the users keeps disconnecting. I believe what it happening is that the user is just closing the VPN client software and not disconnecting first. The big issue

[c-nsp] 6500 - sup1/msfc2 boot problem

2007-07-27 Thread Gheorghe Limboi
Hi, I got into this on trying to boot a cat 6500 sup1/msfc2. I was working ok (testing fortunatly) and after a period of time beeing turned off when I turn it on it goes into rommon. The boot fails with this error. Is it anything that can be done with it? tx, gheorghe *** Bus Error (Load)