ve been working now for 8+ years, so either way, no
complaint here ...)
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
and has
attempted to get the currently (local) licenses from the server. Anyway,
the "license smart conversion" command is not available, all I get are
the commands clear, deregister, export, factory, register, renew and
send. What am I missing here? IOS version is 16.12.5 ...
Than
to
replace the 1600 APs would make the choice easier of course ...
Thanks for the info ...
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail
additional AP licenses anymore (apart from the
physical age of the WLC), I'd like to just replace the AP by moving the
controller part over to an 1832, which can control up to 75 APs ...
Thanks, -garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On 23.10.2019 13:50, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> would you recommend the 4461 to run a handful of
> full feeds for v4 and v6? The model seems to be quite
> affordable compared to ASR 9000 series routers and
> throughput is not our main concern for upstream.
I guess it partly depends
ferent
image (that it also got from the controller) - it has
c1140-k9w8-mx.153-3.JD11, while the one not working keeps downloading
c1140-k9w8-mx.153-3.JBB6 ...
Can anybody give me a hint as what is going wrong here, and how to fix it?
Thanks in advance!
-garry
___
e couldn't live with ...
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
it forwards, instead of
just pushing it through with CEF.
-garry
---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
> Something like https://freetserv.github.io ?
Yup. Though I would have designed it somewhat less modular ... ;)
Tnx for the link!
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
arch
nge of
200-300$ for a finished product with 24 ports. Is this something - both
from a technical as well as financial POV - that folks might be
interested in?
tnx for any feedback, -garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.
at least list the option of using the interim ... :(
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
on a decent setup, but maybe you could get in contact with the CCC crew
in Germany (http//ccc.de), they organize rather large events multiple
times a year, with several thousand users, so they may be able to give
you a few hints as to possible pitfalls ...
-garry
_
Hi,
we were trying to move some QinQ frames through a location and seem to
have some problems ... before we tear everything up and
rebuild/redesign, does anyone have a pointer as to which EtherTypes the
2960S switches support? I tried to find some docs on it, but couldn't
locate anything that
of the docs I found use
the combination of QinQ and bridge groups, so I'm not even sure if this
doesn't work by design ...
Any hints or ideas appreciated ...
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
and creates the printer output ... ?!
Hints appreciated, -garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
than either the 6-Port-1G or the 2-Port-10G
Adder License ...
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi,
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 07:41:14PM +0200, Garry wrote:
A customer of ours needed to extend a rack's switch ports, which at that
point consisted of a stack of two 2960S-LPD-L switches. The new switch
he set up was a 2960X-LPD-L. Anyway, contrary to what I would have
expected, neither
no improvement ...
Tnx, -garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
are way beyond that ...
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
) and
not using error-prone hacks ... any pointers?
Thanks, -garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
On 02.05.2014 02:20, CiscoNSP List wrote:
Hi,
We have a 3750X stack (2 switches) doing pure L2 at a small POP (Acting as a
core switch) - The small buffers are causing a lot of performance issues,
so we are looking to upgrade them.
Not sure about your feature requirements, but have you
On 29.03.2014 20:13, Alan Buxey wrote:
depends on your implementation and architecturebut FreeRADIUS is probably
what you're looking for.
Is there a well working, understandable howto somewhere? I've tried
setting this up for a while, but somehow can't get it to work ... Radius
auth for
with their thoughts and ideas ...
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi,
I've run into a strange problem at a customer that I can't really get a
grip on ...
At the customer site (remote), there's a stack of two 2960S switches,
running a flat setup (no VLANs for customer pointing ports), so
everything is access VLAN 1.
At some areas of the customer location, not
On 08.01.2014 09:57, Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 09:37 +0100, Garry wrote:
After shut/no shut, the port again went down due to BPDU.
Disabling BPDU guard caused the whole switch to lock up while the
desktop switch was connected, even though checking the logs after
removing
for a
100Full port, but ...)
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
with lower admin cost to get similar results, but that would
lower convergence times in case of link failures (I'm using 3 hellos per
second for quick failover of the links)
Tnx, Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
keep in mind that not the bandwidth may be a limiting
factor, but the number of packets ... being hit with even a small to
moderate UDP flood will quickly bring 7200 routers down ...
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
On 28.03.2013 14:36, Shane Heupel wrote:
Is anyone using non-branded SFPs in their Nexus switches? We have purchased
some intel multi-rate SFPs and are curious if they would work in the Nexus.
Thus far, we've been able to get the ports to come up at 1Gig but can't get
them to work at 10Gig.
that the AH seems to be the
cause of the problem ... got the GNS3 setup to work with NAT by removing
the AH part from the transform set, so your idea was dead on!
Now back to the real life setup and hopefully that will also work ...
Thanks!
-garry
Echos to 105.1.5.70, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 106.1.5.2
.
What am I missing here
Help appreciated,
Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
, Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
...
In general, I reckon your choice depends on the actual usage - as a
datacenter/campus switch, the Nexus has a definite price- and
performance-advantage. If you will need to do non-ethernet ports, a
modular switch/router like the Catalyst 4500/6500 will be the better
choice ...
-garry
On 05.11.2012 19:40, Darren O'Connor wrote:
All.
Is it possible to change the subinterface MTU to be different than another
subinterface on the same physical port? I've got no problem doing this on my
Brocade XMR kit. The Cisco always pulls the MTU form the physical interface and
I've found
)
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
44Gbit/s both L2 and L3 ...
Are there any other device in that price range that could be used for
this? 1-2 10GE ports and L3 capable of course ... dynamic routes aren't
really necessary, neither are ACL etc ...
Thanks, Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
3DES or AES),
with an ASR1k with at least ESP-5G doing up to 1.8G/s ... surprised it
is able to push that much ... :)
Alternatively, an ASA 5580-20 is rated at doing a maximum of 1G VPN ...
albeit, not with any MPLS (unless the higher boxes have something in
there now)
-garry
.
Have several 2960S ourselves, and some 30+ at a customer as distribution
layer ... solid switches, decently priced with good features available
in most any combination you may need ... haven't had any problems in the
year they've been in operations ...
-garry
On 17.07.2012 04:36, Mack McBride wrote:
Intermittent low power (brown out) can give very odd behavior.
An on-line/inline UPS would filter these out while an off-line/standby UPS
may not catch the issues.
Due to slight differences in the actual ratings of the various components
(+-10% usual
be quite a bit cheaper ... eg. 5548 has 32
built-in SFP/SFP+ ports with one expansion slot for additional 16
SFP/SFP+ ports. If you need L3, make sure you don't forget to get the L3
card (which pushes up to 160Gbit/s)
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
of these
problems.
Has anybody here experienced a similar problem?
Tnx, Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
, then on a
different for a while, with again all other voltages OK?
Weird ...
Tnx, -garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
into production ... no known problems yet ...
Two newer 1001's we've just took into production came with a slightly
older version, asr1001-universalk9.03.04.00.S.151-3.S.bin ... probably
will be updating these before the site goes into production ...
-garry
across that's
not so nice on the 2960S is the limit of 6 port channels per stack - has
that changed?
Tnx, garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net
extensive
set of samples for all kinds of config combinations ... apart from that,
having set up VPNs with both boxes, I don't think there's much to watch
out for here ... should be pretty much straight forward ... what
problems do you have with it?
-garry
speaking of upcoming 5596
and 1G Support in Q1CY11) tech doc from Cisco, so I suppose they would
not divulge any hidden issues ...
We have a customer with a 5548 and 4 FEXes, no issues to date, though
they're not really pushing the system ...
-garry
in BGP (500k prefixes IIRC
?) though ... but as you wrote, you don't need a full table, so that
shouldn't be a problem. Not sure how much of a performance hit the
Netflow will be once you are actually pushing the 1G through the box ...
-garry
___
cisco-nsp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12.12.2011 09:27, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Monday, December 12, 2011 03:38:56 PM Garry wrote:
Dec 11 22:59:31: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor [BB1]:0 is DOWN
(Received error notification from peer: Holddown time expired)
Dec 11 22:59:52: %LDP-5
to the server, then using the existing logic of
the script to archive it ... was pretty easy to set up, just had to add
the key for the SSH connection to the Nexus ...
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
On 12.12.2011 09:16, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Garry,
Do you see the same with mpls ldp targeted-sessions enabled (even for
normal LDP p2p peers) ? At least this is something I would try first ...
Neither the 7200s nor the ASR support this command
flow ingress
negotiation auto
mpls ip
mpls label protocol ldp
mpls mtu 1520
Thanks, Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
to initiate writing a config - this works fine
on many Cisco devices, but fails on ASR1001 (works on our 1002F) and
Nexus 5548 ... anybody know the updated MIB entry that does the same thing?
Tnx, -garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
amount of throughput, but in case of bad
weather, this might still be too much, so QoS should be the cleaner
solution. Is there some simple way to tell the 1242's to tag and prefer
all of the VoIP VLAN?
Tnx, -garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
On 30.09.2011 01:39, Martin T wrote:
Jason,
I agree that preferring Cisco branded SFP's gives a sort of quality
guarantee. According to a friend of mine, those SFP's were bought from
a electronics market in Moscow:
http://img.nag.ru/images/18388/101019342.gif
Hi,
I've had a problem on a pair of 4500 switches with a MAC address. We
first noticed the CPU being at 99%, and upon investigating, noticed one
switch complained about a flapping MAC address. Further examination
showed that the two switches showed the MAC being advertised from the
other's TenGB
On 22.09.2011 07:45, quinn snyder wrote:
garry -- please see inline.
regards,
q.
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Garry wrote:
On 21.09.2011 23:27, vinny_abe...@dell.com wrote:
Is Gig-E auto negotiation set the same on both devices? It sounds
kind of like the Nortel has Gig-E auto negotiation
1000), same as for the 2960S. When I put the same SFP in
a 2960S, the link comes up at once.
What am I missing here?
Thanks, Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
immediately ...
Tnx, Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
over ... trade-ins are nice ... save money, get rid of junk HW ;)
Tnx, -Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
every time you add a couple nodes ... (expecting
higher cost for maintenance on Open Source software is pretty
prejudicial IMHO...)
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
On 21.04.2011 16:21, Deric Kwok wrote:
Thank you
I also heard the trunk can help it. Do you have this experience?
Beware, there is an inconsistency in naming here ... many manufacturers
speak of combining multiple physical links to one logical link by
calling it trunking. In Cisco names, a
ports in the same VLAN, they won't be able to
talk to each other, even though they are in the same VLAN. All traffic
is required to go out via NNI uplink ports ... (not sure whether this
feature is available on the 6500 series though)
-garry
___
cisco-nsp
... is there anything to watch out for? I was going
to install the client on the customer's ADS directly, which is
recommended in the document ...
Tnx, Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
Hi,
I have a customer ASA which needs to migrate VPNs from one network IP to
another. In order to keep outages down to a minimum, VPNs are to be
migrated one by one. I was wondering if this is at all possible ... to
start off with, I'd have to set up a second outside interface (which in
itself
twice the throughput (~1mpps) and is only 1RU ... price-wise it's not
that much difference (List price of 18k$ for the 7301, 13k$ for the
3845). Or even better, look into an ASR1002F, which is 20k$, but is
rated at 4.4mpps and has 4xGE ... (and has more memory and flash on board)
-garry
available for export purposes ...
(FTP-server usually only had the non-crypto available, with crypto only
through web interface download ...)
So if you're eligible for IOS downloads, you should be able and allowed
to get the k9 and install it ... (hurry, Jan 10 is nearing fast!)
-garry
On 02.01.2011 04:58, Aaron wrote:
You can get SSH for 2511. Use 12.0s.
Yes it would be an old image (12.0(21 or so))
12.0 doesn't seem to be available for download anymore, even under the
deferred section of the download tool ...
Newest version (well, highest version anyway) available is
ports, you'd still have a couple ports to spare ... just used the old
blue rollover-cables to connect to the other devices ... upside is
they're cheap, reliable, low-power usage, only single RU. Downside, only
rather old IOS versions are available, so no SSH or web interface.
-garry
of like a DDoS
;) Wonder if they'll still be able to do some real work ;)
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
...
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
On 15.12.2010 08:29, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
Garry,
It could be related to CSCth59072 Backup interface up instead of
standby which affects the ASR1K.
The latest 15.0(1)S version (03.01.02.S.150-1.S2) should have the fix...
Not sure about the exact extent of this bug, but I'm not having
On 15.12.2010 14:13, Ian Henderson wrote:
On 15/12/2010, at 1:54 AM, Garry wrote:
I'm really starting to
wonder whether we're the only ones on this earth still using a dual
switch config for our routers for redundancy purposes ...
So you're using backup interface for two Ethernet
they are for most parts I guess - all other features at least we
require for production use seem perfectly fine), I'm really starting to
wonder whether we're the only ones on this earth still using a dual
switch config for our routers for redundancy purposes ...
/rant
-garry
in backup mode active ...
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
firmware on regular images is something like 1 1/2
to 2 years old I was wondering whether there are any newer versions
around, or if it's something that could be altered in the config in
order to get the 16M mode to work again ...
Thanks, Garry
___
cisco-nsp
is for Annex-A) most likely uses a different DSL firmware
than 876 (Annex-B) ...
Init FW: init_AMR-3.0.014_no_bist.bin
Operation FW:AMR-3.0.014.bin
FW Source: embedded
FW Version: 3.0.14
Tnx, Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
?
Tnx, -garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
- no telling though whether that will help in the end ... of
course this will also hurt people who actually need /real/ TAC support
... :(
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
On 19.11.2010 09:32, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
g...@greenie.muc.de (Gert Doering) wrote:
currently, there's 2.4 through 2.6 and 3.1S available for download,
Rest assured, this problem is going to be solved.
I guess what you mean is that the part with the accessibility is going to
be solved,
to the LNS that
already has one or multiple connections for that remote site ...
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
2.4 through 2.6 and 3.1S available for download, with different
minor versions ... requirements are regular stuff like BGP, OSPF, MPLS
support ... any comments as to which release would be the most stable?
Tnx, -garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
with 12.4(15)T1 ...
Quote:dsl-gw3.ffm1 uptime is 3 years, 1 week, 5 days, 8 hours, 2 minutes
Receiving DSL connections via L2TP over LAN, and doing lots of MPLS/VRFs
with it ...
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
query to see whether the links are up?
Tnx, Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
On 03.11.2010 20:22, Jonathan Herbert wrote:
We just run an IGP and query throughput on the Tu interfaces. If the
crypto
socket is down, you'll end up with rxbps = 0. Seems to work well.
The problem is that both Spoke-Hub connections run through the same
DMVPN tunnel interface ... and I would
to do
some tests to see whether it works better now ...
Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
for the hint! s...@cks though that the option isn't shown in
the config ...
-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
, but performance is still bad, so I reckon it's not necessarily
caused by this ...
Hints appreciated!
Tnx, Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail
On 30.09.2010 00:45, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
It works the same with regards to switch ports, however the WLAN AP
is autonomous.
You can configure up to 14 VLANs (Table 3):
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps380/data_sheet_c78-519930.html
Thanks!
series to
work the same ... anybody happen to have any experience yet? Or is there
a limitation to the number of vlans?
Tnx, -garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
On 21.09.2010 07:35, Lukasz Bromirski wrote:
On 2010-09-21 01:31, David Blundell wrote:
I am trying to find the number of routes that an ASR1002-F (embedded
ESP2.5) and an ASR-1002 with ESP5 can handle.
ASR1002-F and ASR-1002 can both handle 512k IPv4 prefixes maximum,
128k IPv6 prefixes
On 31.08.2010 09:01, Ziv Leyes wrote:
The 7200 VXR may be a good choice, lower price than ASR and still deliver
what you need.
In case you don't really need all the expansions options perhaps a 7206 is
too big for you in matters of rack space and you can go for a 7204 or even
a 7201, same
of a protocol for something more secure and standardized ...)
Tnx, Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
On 05.08.2010 02:09, Troy Beisigl wrote:
After reading up on VTP server configurations at Cisco, I wanted to
get someone's real life experience sign off on this.
Whatever you do, make sure you set up VTP passwords ... we had an
instance where a switch was not configured for VTP password ...
Hi,
wondering, is there a version of the Cisco switch command service
unsupported-transceiver for routers? (3825) I've had a case where a
customer had an SFP failure and only had some third party SFPs flying
around, which of course wouldn't work (they do in Cisco switches with
the option set), so
On 15.06.2010 18:27, Kaegler, Mike wrote:
I have a few remote sites which can be prone to power failures. For
various reasons, implementing UPSs with management cards is not suitable
and/or desirable.
The remote equipment all supports Dying Gasp, however, but I cannot seem
to find a way to
Hi,
I was wondering, what real life performance can one expect from an NPE
G1, considering mostly vanilla IP routing/forwarding? (no ACLs, no VPNs,
running CEF and MPLS VRFs, OSPF/iBGP for routing protocol, and utilizing
the integrated Gbit interfaces as well as 1-2 STM1 PAs on the 7200 VXR
for similar solutions (and usually not getting an answer)
I couldn't find anything ...
Tnx, Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
... or rather lack thereof ...
We have several customers running 5510 w/ CSC 10 ... most of them only
use them on rather slow lines, like 2-6M aDSL or 2-4M sDSL ... another
one has a CSC20, running on our backbone w/ 100M ethernet uplink, also
without any noticeable problems ...
One customer
, but all the pages google came up with are from places selling
the cards ...
Tnx, Garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
(dynamic) or one of the static (SLB) methods that
is equivalent of mode on. The 2960 will support either of those.
AFAIK, the cards are running in a VMS system ... will try to get more
info about the software side ...
Tnx, garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
