Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-25 Thread John Rudd
MSRBL (as it's no longer being updated) And here's the answer from the actual project: http://msrbl.blogspot.com/2010/01/msrbl-status-update-as-some-of-you-have.html It's amazing what information you get when you actually talk to people. ___ Help us

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-25 Thread Henrik K
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:09:39AM -0800, John Rudd wrote: MSRBL (as it's no longer being updated) And here's the answer from the actual project: http://msrbl.blogspot.com/2010/01/msrbl-status-update-as-some-of-you-have.html It's amazing what information you get when you actually talk

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-24 Thread John Rudd
removes MSRBL (as it's no longer being updated) Did they declare themselves to be defunct, or are you declaring it for them (without any actual announcement from them)? Do you have any indication that MSRBL is still alive and that the signature databases are being actively updated? What do

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-24 Thread Bill Landry
On 1/24/2010 12:43 AM, John Rudd wrote: removes MSRBL (as it's no longer being updated) Did they declare themselves to be defunct, or are you declaring it for them (without any actual announcement from them)? Do you have any indication that MSRBL is still alive and

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-24 Thread John Rudd
Then you don't have a clue and are obviously not qualified to make a judgment call on this matter. They used to routinely have some signatures that would go weeks, even months, without updates. I used tolook at their signatures and see that they were a month or two old ... and a few months

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-24 Thread Bill Landry
John Rudd wrote: Then you don't have a clue and are obviously not qualified to make a judgment call on this matter. They used to routinely have some signatures that would go weeks, even months, without updates. I used tolook at their signatures and see that they were a month or two old ...

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-24 Thread John Rudd
Most recent update from them was 3 months ago. rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-SPAM.ndb -rw-r--r-- 244643 2009/07/27 01:21:23 MSRBL-SPAM.ndb rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-Images.hdb -rw-r--r-- 181337 2009/07/24 03:40:17 MSRBL-Images.hdb rsync

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-24 Thread Bill Landry
John Rudd wrote: Most recent update from them was 3 months ago. rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-SPAM.ndb -rw-r--r-- 244643 2009/07/27 01:21:23 MSRBL-SPAM.ndb rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-Images.hdb -rw-r--r-- 181337 2009/07/24 03:40:17 MSRBL-Images.hdb

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-24 Thread John Rudd
rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-Images-FULL-SoN.hdb -rw-r--r--    19030813 2009/10/07 15:50:05 MSRBL-Images-FULL-SoN.hdb Only the clueless would use that database. Which is irrelevant to the point. The point isn't is it a reasonable/accurate/etc. database, the point is it

[Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-23 Thread Bill Landry
Hi Folks, I have released an updated script that adds no new functionality, but removes MSRBL (as it's no longer being updated) and fixes some issues that have been reported since the last update was released. Here is what has changed with this release (from the CHANGELOG): Version 3.7 (updated

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-23 Thread John Rudd
removes MSRBL (as it's no longer being updated) Did they declare themselves to be defunct, or are you declaring it for them (without any actual announcement from them)? ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-23 Thread Henrik K
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:12:34PM -0800, John Rudd wrote: removes MSRBL (as it's no longer being updated) Did they declare themselves to be defunct, or are you declaring it for them (without any actual announcement from them)? What part of since July 2009 makes you think they aren't

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-23 Thread Bill Landry
I had been an active participant on the MSRBL mailing list for several years. The list is now dead and postings go unanswered. I also periodically exchanged emails with Chris Burton, but now emails to his personal email address also go unanswered. The MSRBL Images file used to be updated

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-23 Thread Dennis Peterson
On 1/23/10 10:12 PM, John Rudd wrote: removes MSRBL (as it's no longer being updated) Did they declare themselves to be defunct, or are you declaring it for them (without any actual announcement from them)? The most recent news from them is Jan of this year: http://msrbl.blogspot.com/ They

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-23 Thread Bill Landry
On 1/23/2010 10:44 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote: On 1/23/10 10:12 PM, John Rudd wrote: removes MSRBL (as it's no longer being updated) Did they declare themselves to be defunct, or are you declaring it for them (without any actual announcement from them)? The most recent news from them is Jan