Classpath licensing (Re: About the java.util.zip project)

I am copying this to the jazzlib and classpath MLs to get some other peoples' opinions on the Classpath license and how it should apply in a case like this. My name is Dongku, Kim. I am a Japanese developer. Hi My company makes commercial software. And, I work to make a module which makes a

Re: Tests, Documentation

Hi, On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 18:21, Sascha Brawer wrote: having read quite a bit of Classpath code, I'd like to express two wishes. First, please write more test cases. [..] Second, please write understandable documentation [...] In other words, I think that we really need to improve the

Re: Tests, Documentation

Hi, On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 13:42, Patrik Reali wrote: I completely agree and support your wishes! In fact, it would be nice if the whole classpath and its documentation (javadoc) would be rebuilt on a regular base and offered through the website. It has to be hosted on something different then

Re: Classpath licensing (Re: About the java.util.zip project)

Hi, On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 13:48, John Leuner wrote: I am copying this to the jazzlib and classpath MLs to get some other peoples' opinions on the Classpath license and how it should apply in a case like this. Best is to direct such questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The FSF is the official

Re: Tests, Documentation

Mark Would someone be willing to try to set that up? Mark Could someone host the auto-generated documentation for now? Last time I ran javadoc on classpath, I got tons and tons of errors. Do we still get that? I could set things up to post the pages to gcc.gnu.org nightly, just like we do for

Re: [PATCH] Two methods for NumberFormat

Guilhem == Guilhem Lavaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guilhem I am continuing the series of patches with that one, it adds two Guilhem methods to NumberFormat: getIntegerInstance() and Guilhem getIntegerInstance(Locale). They have to be implemented according to Guilhem Java 1.4. Guilhem + /**

Re: [PATCH] Field position attribute handling

Mark Wielaard wrote: Hi, On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 02:14, Dalibor Topic wrote: The documentation and code don't match up now. My Class Library book seems to indicate that it actually is instanceof, thought in most cases your code comparing the actual Class seems more correct. It's the recommended

Re: GregorianCalendar fixes

Mark Wielaard wrote: Hi, Since I am not a GregorianCalendar expert I was hoping that someone could review the following patch which I have in my tree from Ito Kazumitsu. He and I wrote a couple of mauve test cases which are fixed by this and I see no new failures. But people didn't seem to be