Hello,
After a discussion I had with Michael Koch, I decided to implement
the java.net.URI class. I found in the classpath mail archives a
patch submited by Mr. Topic (I think) in which he implemented part of
the URI class using:
/**
* Regular expression for parsing URIs.
*
* Taken
Brian Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Giannis Georgalis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please, tell me your thoughts and suggestions about this matter.
ANTLR is usually the better choice for parsing as far as I know, but
I'm not really that knowledgable on grammars and parsing anyway. It's
Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think space is *much* more important than speed when it comes
to parsing URIs. How big is the generated scanner?
The generated scanner is not big (about 300 loc).
I'm also skeptical as to how JFlex is faster. The only thing I
can think of is that a
Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But you still have to allocate the parser object(s), which a
hand-written parser doesn't have to. And object allocation
is relatively expensive, in the context of parsing a URI.
Yes, you are right. So what you are suggesting is a hand-written
parser,
Dalibor Topic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I doubt adding basic IPv6 parsing to the regexp used
should pose significant problems.
For example the
uri : http://1333.2123.232323.0.9.9~84.1; is not
valid, but can be
parsed from this regexp.
You are mixing things up here. That's a valid
Brian Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is essentially the same as the license on the code in w_log.c for
example. Should we go ahead and import the appropriate pieces of code
from OMG?
Shouldn't you ask rms for this matter?
--
Object-oriented programming is an exceptionally bad
idea
C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 28 Sep 2002, Nic Ferrier wrote:
You're changes are unlikely to be accepted if you mix style and
logical changes.
But, luckily, 'cvs diff -U1' can come to the rescue. Do:
Thank you very much Scott. The guide was *very* useful!!! Actually
Thank you all very much for your accurate answers on my
serialVersionUID question.
YASQ (Yet Another Short Question) about code indentation;
I've read some old archives on the list about the indentation of the
code, so I came up with the following java-mode-hook in my .emacs:
(add-hook
Nic Ferrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then you can make your real changes against the re-styled version.
This helps when doing diffs. If real changes are mixed with style
changes it can be impossible to see what actually changed.
Oops ... too late :(
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is necessary for serialization, although it is usually a private
field. ALL classes in classpath which implement java.io.Serializable
should declare this field, and it should match the results of running
Sun's serialver tool on that class; otherwise,
This is the last mail I send to the list about jdiff.sh. You can
always check for the latest version at
http://majestix.ucnet.uoc.gr/~jgeorgal/pub/jdiff.sh I'll maintain from
now on a Changelog file at
http://majestix.ucnet.uoc.gr/~jgeorgal/pub/Changelog for anyone who is
interested.
The new
Hello again,
After some useful comments and a bug report by Michael Koch, jdiff.sh
0.0.1 (BETA) now works in the following ways:
* Handles interfaces correctly ... Give me some help here; When you
have a public interface do all the methods-fields default to public?
I always explicitly
Hello again from the primary spammer of the GNU classpath list :)
I have one question. Please forgive my ignorance, as I'm new to the
classpath project.
What is serialVersionUID?, what is it used for? (instanceof operator?),
where can I find it's value for a specific class? and should *all*
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unchecked exceptions do not need to be reported. There are several
places where Classpath purposefully omits mentioning unchecked
exceptions in the throws clause, because it is just a waste of .class
file size.
For example, these two declarations are
Hello,
I've written a small shell script that compares the methods,
constructors and attributes (public,protected) of the Java official
API (from the official api specification in html format) to the GNU
classpath corespondent classes (from the source code of GCP).
The script doesn't
Stephen Crawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Stephen,
Giannis,
First, this email would be better directed to the kissme mailing list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've cc'ed that list. If you reply to this email, please remove
[EMAIL PROTECTED] from the cc: list.
I sent it to the
16 matches
Mail list logo
