I'd be happy to contribute stuff (see earlier ps remark about swing stuff)
And yup, dislike typing docs. but I guess that's been noticed.
Ps, yup, just yesterday people came by submitting compiler
construction assignments for me to test who were
also working on the dot-gnu thing !
R.
Mark
Golly. That's further than I got.
I'd be very interested in seeing it even if no one else is.
Nic
___
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Nic Ferrier wrote:
here it is:
http://www.cs.vu.nl/~rveldema/parcc1.tgz
unpack and see javalibs/java/nio, javalibs/manta/runtime/
the native side is in runtime/shared/io.c
If you actually want to try it out,
download the release from
http://www.cs.vu.nl/~rveldema/
and unpack the file
Hi,
On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 14:26, R.S. Veldema wrote:
Ps, to any of the gnu people listening:
a good while a go I submitted a copyright assignment
for my basic swing implementation and never heard anything
since then (we are talking months now...).
Brian are you tracking this?
I have no
Hi,
On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 14:53, R.S. Veldema wrote:
here it is:
http://www.cs.vu.nl/~rveldema/parcc1.tgz
unpack and see javalibs/java/nio, javalibs/manta/runtime/
the native side is in runtime/shared/io.c
O boy! You got most of the infrastructure already done.
It does need some
Mark == Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 14:26, R.S. Veldema wrote:
Ps, to any of the gnu people listening:
a good while a go I submitted a copyright assignment
for my basic swing implementation and never heard anything
since then (we are talking months
Tom Tromey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mark == Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 14:26, R.S. Veldema wrote:
Ps, to any of the gnu people listening:
a good while a go I submitted a copyright assignment
for my basic swing implementation and never heard
R.S. Veldema wrote :
Ps, to any of the gnu people listening:
a good while a go I submitted a copyright assignment
for my basic swing implementation and never heard anything
since then (we are talking months now...).
Once again this system of copyright assignment slows people
and project. I
hi all,
do you have any plan on adding nio support and asynchronous io to the
classpath project?
if yes what is your agenda on this subject.
bye
Jakob
___
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
Jakob Praher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi all,
do you have any plan on adding nio support and asynchronous io to the
classpath project?
if yes what is your agenda on this subject.
I have done a little bit of work for GCJ with this.
Unfortunately I haven't had any time recently to
Am Mon, 2002-02-04 um 18.39 schrieb Nic Ferrier:
Jakob Praher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi all,
do you have any plan on adding nio support and asynchronous io to the
classpath project?
if yes what is your agenda on this subject.
I have done a little bit of work for GCJ
Jakob Praher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Mon, 2002-02-04 um 18.39 schrieb Nic Ferrier:
Jakob Praher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi all,
do you have any plan on adding nio support and asynchronous io to the
classpath project?
if yes what is your agenda on this
Hi,
On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 18:27, Jakob Praher wrote:
Am Mon, 2002-02-04 um 18.39 schrieb Nic Ferrier:
Jakob Praher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
do you have any plan on adding nio support and asynchronous io to the
classpath project?
if yes what is your agenda on this subject.
Mark Wielaard wrote:
I have read the online 1.4 specs for java.nio and thought about how to
implement it but I have done no actual work. We will get it in time, but
nobody is actively working on it at the moment.
For me, most tricky parts of nio is Buffer. You have to extend JNI to
enable
Hi,
On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 22:19, Artur Biesiadowski wrote:
Do you think that Buffers should be a part of classpath ? Or should they
be left for jvm implementors ? There is quite a lot of code there - all
kinds of wrapper classes, splitting, views etc. But on the other hand,
core get/set
Mark Wielaard wrote:
do you have any plan on adding nio support and asynchronous io to the
classpath project?
if yes what is your agenda on this subject.
I have done a little bit of work for GCJ with this.
I have read the online 1.4 specs for java.nio and thought about how to
implement it
From: Artur Biesiadowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For me, most tricky parts of nio is Buffer. You have to extend JNI to
enable them, make some special tricks in jvm to allow them to work with
acceptable speed.
Do you think that Buffers should be a part of classpath ? Or should they
be left for
17 matches
Mail list logo
