jdiff.sh (BETA)

2002-09-21 Thread Giannis Georgalis
Hello again, After some useful comments and a bug report by Michael Koch, jdiff.sh 0.0.1 (BETA) now works in the following ways: * Handles interfaces correctly ... Give me some help here; When you have a public interface do all the methods-fields default to public? I always explicitly

Re: jdiff.sh (BETA)

2002-09-21 Thread Michael Koch
* Handles interfaces correctly ... Give me some help here; When you have a public interface do all the methods-fields default to public? I always explicitly declare them public, but that's not the case in eg. java.net.SocketOptions (is that a valid declaration?) (Thanks Michael) I found

Re: jdiff.sh (BETA)

2002-09-21 Thread Eric Blake
Giannis Georgalis wrote: Hello again, After some useful comments and a bug report by Michael Koch, jdiff.sh 0.0.1 (BETA) now works in the following ways: * Handles interfaces correctly ... Give me some help here; When you have a public interface do all the methods-fields default to

Re: jdiff.sh (BETA)

2002-09-21 Thread Giannis Georgalis
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unchecked exceptions do not need to be reported. There are several places where Classpath purposefully omits mentioning unchecked exceptions in the throws clause, because it is just a waste of .class file size. For example, these two declarations are