The sufficiently smart compiler argument
comes to mind: if the arglist of a function is known, then surely
the
compiler should be able to automatically translate named/keyword
arguments into an appropriate simple call?
That is exactly what motivated me to write this macro. I was pretty
sure
2009/7/17 Mark Addleman mark_addle...@bigfoot.com
The sufficiently smart compiler argument
comes to mind: if the arglist of a function is known, then surely
the
compiler should be able to automatically translate named/keyword
arguments into an appropriate simple call?
That is exactly
Thanks. Your code is definitely much more idiomatic Clojure - and 3X
faster. The lcs function does exactly what it is suppose to, but the
backtrack-all function only returns the first LCS found(for the
strings AATCC ACACG = (ACC), whereas the Python version returns
all the LCSes found (for the
Hello,
Can this construct handle higher-order functions?
(I mean a function with named arguments as an argument to another
function).
It seems quite difficult to do a function dependent transformation on
the call site when the function is unknown.
Best regards,
Nicolas.
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at
Heheh, three times slower but gives the wrong answer--maybe not a
great trade-off :o)
I'd misread the way the last if statements work in the Python
version. I modified mine to read:
(defn backtrack-all [c x y i j]
(cond (or (zero? i) (zero? j))
#{}
(= (get x (dec i)) (get y
On Jul 17, 4:56 am, Richard Newman holyg...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want unsyntactic input in your file, comment it out with
semicolons.
Adding true block comments -- #| |# -- is on the to-do list.
While we're on the subject, are there any plans for a sexp-comment?
Essentially I'm looking
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:13 AM,
philip.hazel...@gmail.comphilip.hazel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 17, 4:56 am, Richard Newman holyg...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want unsyntactic input in your file, comment it out with
semicolons.
Adding true block comments -- #| |# -- is on the to-do list.
2009/7/16 Daniel dan.in.a.bot...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Michael Woodesiot...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
What I am wondering now is whether it's possible to use JBoss' RMI
connector/object server (on port 1099) with Stuart's JMX library. If
I just try pointing it at port
This is so trivial from a technical standpoint I'm embarrassed to
mention it. The REPL is accepting more than one sexp on a line and
then generating output for all of them in an unusual fashion. In the
following, all text after the first line is generated by clojure
(except for the comment, of
Sounds like a good application of the broken window principle to me.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:05 AM, AlamedaMike amino.metr...@gmail.comwrote:
This is so trivial from a technical standpoint I'm embarrassed to
mention it. The REPL is accepting more than one sexp on a line and
then
Hi,
I have installed vimClojure and it seems to work, but... how to push
the code to the REPL?
I have defined a function, typed \sr - REPL started... the fn is not
accessible... tried typinf \ef '\el and their cousins to the vim
command but nothing happens.
I am a notal novice to vim, so the
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Michael Woodesiot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/16 Daniel dan.in.a.bot...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Michael Woodesiot...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
What I am wondering now is whether it's possible to use JBoss' RMI
connector/object server (on
Hi,
On Jul 17, 3:51 pm, Dragan Djuric draga...@gmail.com wrote:
I have installed vimClojure and it seems to work, but... how to push
the code to the REPL?
Ok. Let's see. Step by step...
0. Start ng-server
1. Start a fresh vim.
2. :setfiletype clojure (a colon command like :w or :q)
3. \sr
On Jul 16, 11:50 pm, Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/17 Mark Addleman mark_addle...@bigfoot.com
The sufficiently smart compiler argument
comes to mind: if the arglist of a function is known, then surely
the
compiler should be able to automatically translate
On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:05 AM, AlamedaMike wrote:
As I say, technically very trivial, but it violates the principal of
least surprise (for me). I bring it up only because of reasons of
broader acceptance by the business community. I know how some of them
think, and even trivial stuff like this
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Mark
Addlemanmark_addle...@bigfoot.com wrote:
On Jul 17, 2:35 am, Nicolas Oury nicolas.o...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Can this construct handle higher-order functions?
Nope :)
Chouser brought up this point in IRC. It's not even clear what the
syntax
On Jul 16, 12:58 am, Christian Vest Hansen karmazi...@gmail.com
wrote:
I haven't tried to look beyond the JIT to see what it does, so I
wouldn't know which tools to use, but if you do not already know about
it, you might find the HotSpot Internals wiki to be an interesting
source of
Hi,
2009/7/17 Mark Addleman mark_addle...@bigfoot.com
On Jul 16, 11:50 pm, Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/17 Mark Addleman mark_addle...@bigfoot.com
The sufficiently smart compiler argument
comes to mind: if the arglist of a function is known, then surely
2009/7/17 Chouser chou...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Mark
Addlemanmark_addle...@bigfoot.com wrote:
On Jul 17, 2:35 am, Nicolas Oury nicolas.o...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Can this construct handle higher-order functions?
Nope :)
Chouser brought up this point in
(I once tried to write a reader macro for CL which would do this, but
the best I got was one which would read two forms and ignore the
first.)
The usual technique in Common Lisp is
cl-user(1): (list 1 2 #+(or) 3 4)
(1 2 4)
You can improve readability by using #+:never or somesuch, but that
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Laurent PETITlaurent.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/17 Chouser chou...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Mark
Addlemanmark_addle...@bigfoot.com wrote:
On Jul 17, 2:35 am, Nicolas Oury nicolas.o...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Can this construct
A maybe related newbie question.
How common is it for Clojure to separate the two implementations into
different libraries?
For example, in an application I create one lib that contains just the
data for the app (app.data)
and two other libraries that provide the functions on the data
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Stephen C. Gilardi squee...@mac.comwrote:
It looks like somehow you're seeing a very old REPL or it's not the default
REPL you get from launching Clojure via clojure.main.
I can confirm the described behavior for the enclojure REPL.
Is there a function in clojure.core or clojure.contrib so that:
(and (mystery-fn '(a b c d) '(a b))
(not (mystery-fn '(a b c d) '(a b d
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:32 PM, samppirbysam...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a function in clojure.core or clojure.contrib so that:
(and (mystery-fn '(a b c d) '(a b))
(not (mystery-fn '(a b c d) '(a b d
how about something like:
(defn mystery-fn [l1 l2] (every? identity (map = l1
Awesome, thanks for the quick answer. I think that it'd be a useful
thing to add to seq-utils or something. :)
On Jul 17, 1:41 pm, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:32 PM, samppirbysam...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a function in clojure.core or
Chouser -
Can you describe definline and how that differs from defmacro? I'm
not sure I understand it from reading the docs.
On Jul 17, 10:06 am, Chouser chou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Laurent PETITlaurent.pe...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/7/17 Chouser
Thanks! :)
On Jul 17, 5:08 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
On Jul 17, 3:51 pm, Dragan Djuric draga...@gmail.com wrote:
I have installed vimClojure and it seems to work, but... how to push
the code to the REPL?
Ok. Let's see. Step by step...
0. Start ng-server
1. Start
On Jul 17, 1:52 pm, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
#_ does what you want:
user= (list 1 2 #_42 3)
(1 2 3)
Thanks for pointing that out.
I notice this is actually on the reader page - apologies for not
looking properly.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:32 PM, samppirbysam...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a function in clojure.core or clojure.contrib so that:
(and (mystery-fn '(a b c d) '(a b))
(not (mystery-fn '(a b c d) '(a b
On Jul 14, 5:12 pm, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 14, 3:01 pm, bgray graybran...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so *if* this is intended behavior, what have people been doing to
bind variables dependant on other bindings? I can't be the first to
run into this.
Just
I was experimenting with how binding behaves within a loop and found
some inconsistent results:
(def y 0)
(loop [x 0]
(println x x)
(binding [y (inc y)]
(println y y)
(if ( x 10) (recur (inc x)
The printed lines are what you'd expect:
x 0
y 1
x 1
...
x 10
y 11
But if you
How can I lexically bind names like let does in a macro, when names
and values for those bindings are passed in?
This here works fine when I pass a literal collection:
(defmacro let-coll
[coll body]
`(let ~(vec coll) ~...@body))
user= (let-coll [a 11 b 22] (list b a))
(22 11)
Doing the
Here is an update to my log viewer in clojure. It mostly works on
win32 and I hope to get it past an alpha release., but if you are
interested in gui applications in clojure, all source is provided.
http://code.google.com/p/lighttexteditor/wiki/LightLogViewer
If you run it, I will be happy.
Hi,
Am 18.07.2009 um 05:52 schrieb Rowdy Rednose:
How can I lexically bind names like let does in a macro, when names
and values for those bindings are passed in?
You can't. A macro cannot depend on runtime information
(for some suitable definition of runtime information, I know).
In a call
35 matches
Mail list logo
