I've got a question about lazy-sequence and file reading.
Is line-seq good to process lines from huge file?
Let take this case, I want to process each line from a file with one or
more functions. All lines must be processed. Line-seq return a lazy
sequence, it means all already read lines stay
Just started using Clojure, found myself asking a similar question. Was
writing programs operating as part of unix command shell pipes, so I wrote
a macro that did something like the perl diamond operator. It iterates over
a series of files and standard input, opening each in turn and reading
There's a free 19 part series on basic Clojure @
http://www.udemy.com/clojure-code
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Christian Sperandio
christian.speran...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got a question about lazy-sequence and file reading.
Is line-seq good to process lines from huge file?
Let take this case, I want to process each line from a file with one or more
functions. All
Hi,
I am happy to announce `lein-clr`, a Leiningen plugin for building
ClojureCLR projects:
https://github.com/kumarshantanu/lein-clr
As of 0.1.0, dependency mechanism is not provided (external
dependencies can be specified) but the following tasks work:
* clean
* compile
* repl
* run
* test
Great work! Really looking forward to NuGet integration.
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Shantanu Kumar kumar.shant...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I am happy to announce `lein-clr`, a Leiningen plugin for building
ClojureCLR projects:
https://github.com/kumarshantanu/lein-clr
As of 0.1.0,
I've looked at this for a bit now. It seems there are some slight
inconsistencies in how the redirect info is used:
Where the redirect-on-autth? is being set up for the interactive-form
workflow it looks to me to be assumed to be a boolean flag.
What happens if the Persona project closes down?
On Friday, October 26, 2012 7:06:48 AM UTC-4, Dave Sann wrote:
For authorisation, I really like mozilla persona (previously browserid)
which I discovered from refheap. javascript lib plus an http request from
the server to validate. really
I'm using clojure.org a lot.
Unfortunately navigating in it, since two weeks or so, was made worse.
Is anyone feeling the same way ? Or I am just too stupid to use this
webpage?
What has been made worse?:
In the old version, on the left edge, there were, under `Documentation',
all the
I never really get Persona (means person in Italian that doesn't really
make a lot of sense, but whatever) what if I share my pc with my brother ?
Maybe i miss something...
If you are using mongodb I am using https://github.com/xavi/noir-auth-app that
is using congomongo and since i am using
Hello Heinz,
I'm sorry you're finding navigation difficult on Clojure.org. I agree that
fewer clicks are better, but we (me, Stuart Halloway, and a few others)
felt that the site was getting cluttered with too many links, which was
confusing to newcomers.
It would be nice if the Documentation
On Oct 28, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Patrik Sundberg wrote:
I've looked at this for a bit now. It seems there are some slight
inconsistencies in how the redirect info is used:
Where the redirect-on-autth? is being set up for the interactive-form
workflow it looks to me to be assumed to be a
Hello Stuart,
Thank you for your prompt reply.
It would be nice if the Documentation link in the left-side column
could expand into a list of sub-sections, but I don't know if the
technology behind the site (Wikispaces) can support that right now.
That would be very nice, indeed. The
P.S.: the compatibility shim for 0.1.x API functions were 2 days late.
Already upgraded to the new API. Had I just waited 48 hours... ;-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
2012/10/29 raschedh rasche...@gmail.com
I know that the following is a minority opinion: But this attention to
newcomers is, albeit very honourable and of course economically necessary,
bad.
If growing the community and making it possible for more people to use
Clojure at work, school or
On Friday, October 26, 2012 11:11:48 PM UTC-4, daveray wrote:
I guess I looking for a magical line-seq that closes the file correctly
even if you consume part of the sequence, is resilient to exceptions,
etc, etc. I realize that it might be impossible, so I asked. :)
It's been discussed
Ah. I don't wanna go into flames here.
And I *said*, I know this is the opinion of the majority.
So relax.
Nobody cares about what I think about this.
Nobody is going to change anything, because of me.
All I wanted to say is that this formulation:
make sure newcomers have pretty good time.
is
On Sunday, October 28, 2012 8:14:41 PM UTC, Chas Emerick wrote:
On Oct 28, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Patrik Sundberg wrote:
I've looked at this for a bit now. It seems there are some slight
inconsistencies in how the redirect info is used:
Where the redirect-on-autth? is being set up for the
And these kids in school, and these people at work, you refer to:
My argument is this: Those that come to clojure by themselves,
because they can not help. Because they are so occupied with computers,
so occupied with mastering everything, because they
can not stop looking for beauty.
They won't
## TL;DR
The Clojure documentation project (http://clojure-doc.org) continues to
make progress.
Lion's share of the work this week went into the Concurrency and
Parallelism guide:
http://clojure-doc.org/articles/language/concurrency_and_parallelism.html
which is now about 75% complete.
## CDS
2012/10/29 raschedh rasche...@gmail.com
My argument is this: Those that come to clojure by themselves,
because they can not help. Because they are so occupied with computers,
so occupied with mastering everything, because they
can not stop looking for beauty.
They won't be stopped by
Sorry but this is absolutely ridiculous. I know quite a few people who are
interested in what Clojure has to offer
but find it really hard to get in, not because of the language but because
of the way Clojure
documentation and tools are (experts-oriented). Some of them have given
up, at
On Sunday, October 28, 2012 6:16:12 PM UTC-4, raschedh wrote:
...
If you do not come back, you do not want it enough.
...
Then a few extra clicks on the homepage shouldn't deter you.
Sorry, couldn't resist :-)
Vinod
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Stuart,
Thanks for the link. It confirms the suspicions I had about a general
solution for this issue. For the particular code I'm working with,
I'll try pushing with-open further up and see if that gives me some of
the flexibility I'm looking for.
Cheers,
Dave
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:21 PM,
24 matches
Mail list logo
