On Jul 8, 8:37 pm, Christian Marks 9fv...@gmail.com wrote:
The moral of this story is: don't let anyone clip your wings.
Well said. That is my take away too. It is surprising how to me how
much weight people give to the assertions of others, famous or not. In
truth, this human endeavor of
On Dec 20, 10:53 am, Aaron Bedra aaron.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/20/10 1:47 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Aaron Bedraaaron.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/20/10 1:39 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Meikel Brandmeyerm...@kotka.de
Can you articulate it any better than ah hah!?
On Dec 19, 11:33 am, Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
There have been discussions, here and elsewhere, about
whether Clojure is a Lisp. Lots of discussion centers
around facts like homoiconicity, or the REPL, or the
debate of Rich's
On Dec 18, 9:55 am, Alex Baranosky alexander.barano...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there a similar free service to use with Compojure? If not free, then
what are the cheap options?
A little googling revealed that Google App Engine will work:
I wouldn't worry too much about your reputation. Your posts are top
notch, and you obviously know the language better than 90% of most
clojure users. Have confidence and laugh if you think someone is
disparaging: actions speak far louder than words.
On Dec 14, 4:42 am, Ken Wesson
Just ran across:
http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2006/04/lisp-is-not-acceptable-lisp.html
Whoah! I had no idea there was so much, uh, 'intricacy' going on
behind Lisp. :)
Anyway, it was interesting to read it having a bit of Clojure under my
belt. With the exception of types, it seems like
On Dec 14, 8:52 pm, ka sancha...@gmail.com wrote:
user= (get-in m [])
{:a {:b {:c 10, :c1 20}, :b1 90}, :a1 100}
This seems strange to me. I would expect Clojure to return nil, as
there is no key in there that is nil. Assuming that an empty vector is
the same as asking for a nil key, that is.
Ok, I decided to nuke ports, fink, and delete every package they ever
installed. I successfully installed emacs 23.2 via homebrew (there's a
good overview of homebrew here
http://ascarter.net/2010/02/22/homebrew-for-os-x.html).
I started the emacs it installed, but I didn't know how to access
to work so well
in my experience.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:43 PM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I decided to nuke ports, fink, and delete every package they ever
installed. I successfully installed emacs 23.2 via homebrew (there's a
good overview of homebrew
herehttp
On Dec 9, 11:11 pm, Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.com wrote:
Follow the instructions on the ELPA page for installing it:
http://tromey.com/elpa/install.html
After you do M-x package-list-packages, go down the list of packages
until the cursor is on the line for the package
On Dec 13, 8:51 pm, Phil Hagelberg p...@hagelb.org wrote:
If you check out the source for Emacs 24, it comes with package.el
already, so once it's released it will definitely be the lowest-hassle
way to get started. No need to worry about instability; I've been
following Emacs trunk since 2007
(conflicting advice snipped)
If we can reach consensus on best (easiest, least error-prone) path to
getting a working emacs clojure environment up on OSX I'll happily
execute and even write up my experience.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
What is FFI?
On Dec 9, 10:47 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:43 AM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
It does beg the question, though: what is a reasonable bare minimum
function set that a real-life lisp would require?
I think different people might
On Dec 9, 7:08 am, Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
If the audience is Java / Ruby, my guess is that they don't want to know
about emacs, for one.
I agree - learning clojure, I don't want to know about emacs either
(especially since installing clojure support has been unsuccessful
Common Lisp.
http://quotenil.com/
On Dec 9, 7:09 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Alec Battles alec.batt...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure a few people have read this news already. It's been up for a
week, though strangely ZDnet -- which, on principle, I
On Dec 9, 9:07 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:55 PM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
Common Lisp.
It figures. :)
It's still a really exciting story - thanks Alec for sharing it! I was
reading Gabor's post (http://quotenil.com/Planet-Wars-Post
On Dec 9, 5:41 pm, Alec Battles alec.batt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 6, 9:16 pm, Phil Hagelberg p...@hagelb.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:00 PM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for asking here, but I think it's at least a little relevant to
Clojure since I for one wouldn't
On Dec 9, 9:16 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:13 AM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 9, 9:07 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:55 PM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
Common Lisp.
It figures. :)
It's
I was looking at quote.
user= (quote 1)
1
user= (quote)
nil
user= (quote quote)
quote
user= ((quote quote) 1)
nil
It's the last result that confuses me. I would have expected the
result to be 1 - e.g. the same as (quote 1). I figured I'd try quote
on something other than itself, and it just got
On Dec 8, 12:05 pm, Aaron Cohen aa...@assonance.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:40 PM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
I was looking at quote.
user= (quote 1)
1
user= (quote)
nil
user= (quote quote)
quote
user= ((quote quote) 1)
nil
It's the last result that confuses
On Dec 6, 11:58 pm, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:15 AM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike and I have had a nice off-line conversation where we enumerated
the possible things that can come after open-parens. I listed 7, he
added 3:
1. A value
On Dec 7, 5:50 am, Sean Devlin francoisdev...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a solved problem. The trick is to use a higher-higher order
function...
http://fulldisclojure.blogspot.com/2010/01/12-fn-proposal-same-multis...
Why not call it unseq?
--
You received this message because you are
The three things that I've seen that impressed me (and I'm a newb)
were:
1. Swing GUI construction. Clojure's psuedo with syntax makes it
very elegant.
2. Multi-threaded ant simulation. Although, I might try to do
something simpler.
3. Numerical calculations. The fact that Clojure uses arbitrary
Hello, I'm a long-time Java programmer who's tired of mutability
getting in my way. I've been largely enjoying the pervasive use of
closures in JavaScript, and though I'd check out Clojure.
So far so good. It installed easily and the REPL is easy to use. I've
watched the screencasts and have
On Dec 6, 5:40 pm, Stuart Halloway stuart.hallo...@gmail.com wrote:
The world is a series of immutable states, and the future is a function of
the past.
See http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Are-We-There-Yet-Rich-Hickey.
My philosophy questions are the most interesting to people, ha!
Neat
Sorry for asking here, but I think it's at least a little relevant to
Clojure since I for one wouldn't be installing emacs if it wasn't for
Clojure and Slime. Getting prompts about what the function arguments
are seems like a HUGE benefit when learning this langauge. I imagine
other non-emacs
On Dec 6, 9:16 pm, Phil Hagelberg p...@hagelb.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:00 PM, javajosh javaj...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for asking here, but I think it's at least a little relevant to
Clojure since I for one wouldn't be installing emacs if it wasn't for
Clojure and Slime
On Dec 6, 6:24 pm, Robert McIntyre r...@mit.edu wrote:
@javajosh You're speaking of the Turing description of computation,
you might be interested in Church's lambda calculus description which
works just as well and doesn't use mutability to describe computation,
Thanks, I'll look
On Dec 6, 6:01 pm, Mike Meyer mwm-keyword-googlegroups.
620...@mired.org wrote:
good stuff snipped
Mike and I have had a nice off-line conversation where we enumerated
the possible things that can come after open-parens. I listed 7, he
added 3:
1. A value (if the paren has a tick '( )
2. A
29 matches
Mail list logo
