On Sun, 02 May 2010 13:06:56 +1000
Alex Osborne a...@meshy.org wrote:
e evier...@gmail.com writes:
Can you imagine how disruptive it would be at this point to do it the
other way around? If you were starting out today without any Lisp
baggage, it seems TOTALLY obvious to me that lists
On May 2, 11:14 pm, Mike Meyer mwm-keyword-googlegroups.
620...@mired.org wrote:
On Sun, 02 May 2010 13:06:56 +1000
To get behavior similar to the vector constructs, you want to use
list, which works like vector, except returning a list instead of a
vector: (list 1 2 3 (print :hello)). It
On Sun, 2 May 2010 14:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Jarkko Oranen chous...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 2, 11:14 pm, Mike Meyer mwm-keyword-googlegroups.
620...@mired.org wrote:
On Sun, 02 May 2010 13:06:56 +1000
To get behavior similar to the vector constructs, you want to use
list, which works like
interesting so far. the format I first tried didn't work on my droid, but
no big deal.
one, kind-of Eureka moment I just had, which is somewhat blasphemous, I
guess:
Craig is going through how a vector is [1 2 3] but a list has to be '(1 2
3)? Well, that may be one of the turn-offs people have
And ... in another Ah-ha based on an email I just received on this subject
... what should really be said here is that there should be an explicit
symbol to say that the first argument of the list is receiving special
treatment (the words of the emailer). Well, that got me thinking:
Now I know
e evier...@gmail.com writes:
Can you imagine how disruptive it would be at this point to do it the
other way around? If you were starting out today without any Lisp
baggage, it seems TOTALLY obvious to me that lists would have been (1
2 3), and the *calling of a function* would have been the
doesn't sound like you are misunderstanding. Data is data, first and
foremost in that model. you have to work to turn something into a function.
other than functions, everything is data. That's the JSON way, for sure.
When something is a function, you see things like eval and function in
Craig,
I enjoyed you presentations, but I have a bit of a tangent question.
I'm still new to slime, so it's not a comfortable environment for me
yet. What I am wondering is how exactly, when operating with the
split code and repl buffers, you are getting code buffer expressions
to evaluate in
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 06:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Mark Hamstra markhams...@gmail.com wrote:
Craig,
I'm not Craig, but he's not answered yet, so...
I enjoyed you presentations, but I have a bit of a tangent question.
I'm still new to slime, so it's not a comfortable environment for me
yet. What I am
I enjoyed you presentations, but I have a bit of a tangent question.
I'm still new to slime, so it's not a comfortable environment for me
yet. What I am wondering is how exactly, when operating with the
split code and repl buffers, you are getting code buffer expressions
to evaluate in
On 20 April 2010 15:41, Craig Andera craig.and...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep: that's good advice, although I can't say I find much in emacs to
be basic, even after using it casually for 20 years :). The one I
tended to use in the tutorial (in case someone saw it flash by in the
minibuffer) is C-x
One final update: all six parts are now available, including the mobile
downloads for offline viewing. http://link.pluralsight.com/clojure
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Craig Andera craig.and...@gmail.comwrote:
Glad you've enjoyed them!
2010/4/13 Pelayo Ramón pela...@gmail.com
I have
If you mean downloading and viewing on my computers and mobile devices,
then sure. There's no DRM. There's not even any registration required. But
if by copying you mean distributing to other people, then no. If you
have some other scenario in mind, contact me off-list and I'll hook you up
with
Glad you've enjoyed them!
2010/4/13 Pelayo Ramón pela...@gmail.com
I have seen the first 2, and as a clojure noobie I have to say that
they are great. Thanks a lot.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Craig Andera craig.and...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you mean downloading and viewing on my
Craig Andera wrote:
I've recorded a screencast on Clojure concurrency primitives. It's
available at http://link.pluralsight.com/clojure. Thought some here
might find it useful. It's in six parts, the first four of which are up
now. The last two will be up by the middle of next week. Feedback
Right, good point: I should have seen that coming given the target audience.
:)
Within a few hours, a mobile download link will appear with wmvs and mp4s
in a variety of resolutions so you can watch these offline on the device of
your choosing. The conversion lags the rest of the process a little
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Craig Andera cand...@wangdera.com wrote:
I've recorded a screencast on Clojure concurrency primitives. It's available
at http://link.pluralsight.com/clojure. Thought some here might find it
useful. It's in six parts, the first four of which are up now. The last
17 matches
Mail list logo
