Re: Mac Emacs users: which version do you prefer (Aquamacs, Carbon Emacs, other?)

2010-06-14 Thread Phil Hagelberg
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Rob Lachlan robertlach...@gmail.com wrote: Probably, but I'm at a loss to figure out exactly what it might be.  I cleaned emacs off, along with the .emacs.d directory, reinstalled, and the problem reappeared. I'm not touching it right now since, as I mentioned,

Re: Mac Emacs users: which version do you prefer (Aquamacs, Carbon Emacs, other?)

2010-06-13 Thread Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson
Weird - I installed the Cocoa build last night, and got everything set up via elpa including swank-clojure. Some local problem? Regards, Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Rob Lachlan robertlach...@gmail.com wrote: I agree that the cocoa builds are the nicest.  But there

Re: Mac Emacs users: which version do you prefer (Aquamacs, Carbon Emacs, other?)

2010-06-13 Thread Rob Lachlan
Probably, but I'm at a loss to figure out exactly what it might be. I cleaned emacs off, along with the .emacs.d directory, reinstalled, and the problem reappeared. I'm not touching it right now since, as I mentioned, I managed too bootstrap using aquamacs. On Jun 13, 12:42 am, Thomas Kjeldahl

Mac Emacs users: which version do you prefer (Aquamacs, Carbon Emacs, other?)

2010-06-12 Thread Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson
What are the major differences in the different distributions, particularly for Clojure development? I've got everything (Slime, Paredit, Clojure-mode etc) set up in Carbon emacs and it works great, just curious if there are any substantials gains to be had in Aquamacs or other alternative

Re: Mac Emacs users: which version do you prefer (Aquamacs, Carbon Emacs, other?)

2010-06-12 Thread David Nolen
Carbon Emacs is great, I used it for years. However it will no longer be supported. I've since switched over to the Cocoa 23 port. It's lacking in some niceties but it's totally usable. On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson tho...@kjeldahlnilsson.net wrote: What are the

Re: Mac Emacs users: which version do you prefer (Aquamacs, Carbon Emacs, other?)

2010-06-12 Thread Phil Hagelberg
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson tho...@kjeldahlnilsson.net wrote: What are the major differences in the different distributions, particularly for Clojure development? I've got everything (Slime, Paredit, Clojure-mode etc) set up in Carbon emacs and it works great,

Re: Mac Emacs users: which version do you prefer (Aquamacs, Carbon Emacs, other?)

2010-06-12 Thread Steven E. Harris
Moritz Ulrich ulrich.mor...@googlemail.com writes: Aquamacs integrates nice, but it changes many emacs keybinding per-default and makes it hard to change them, which is a no-go for me. Here's what I use (so far) to beat it back into shape: (cua-mode 0) (transient-mark-mode 1)

Re: Mac Emacs users: which version do you prefer (Aquamacs, Carbon Emacs, other?)

2010-06-12 Thread Rob Lachlan
I agree that the cocoa builds are the nicest. But there is one problem that I've had with them: I wasn't able to successfully install swank-clojure through elpa from within that emacs. Curiously, I was able to install it through elpa in aquamacs, and then I had no problem using swank-clojure