Can someone kindly review and apply the patch. [CS-15018]

2012-06-11 Thread Saksham Srivastava
Original Message Subject: [PATCH] CS-15018: Event USER.LOGIN should contain the client IP address. Changes made in accordance with the coding convention. Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 11:23:55 -0400 From: Saksham Srivastava saksham.srivast...@citrix.com To:

Re: Can i use BVT in 2.2.y to test 3.0 Cloudstack ?

2012-06-11 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:34:08PM -0400, kangta123 wrote: Hi All: I found some of test cases can not run successfully, but in 2.2.y is ok that i have been modified some test cases according to my environment. So i want know if i can use BVT in 2.2.y to test 3.0 Cloudstack.

[PATCH] Implementing the SetFirewallRulesCommand for the simulator

2012-06-11 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
* Essential since we need firewall rules open before applying network rules. Without the fix one recieves an UnsupportedCommandAnswer and fails the application of the network rule * Also RebootCommand responds with a RebootAnswer - minor fix Signed-off-by: Prasanna Santhanam

RE: Event Publish and Subscribe ( was perhaps Re: Cloudstack Questions )

2012-06-11 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
Summarized requirements as per discussion in the forum at http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/RelOps/Cloudstack+Events Following are some items for which community opinion will help: 1. What should be used to classify messages (*topic*) - domain or account ? 2. Is there any differentiation

Re: error while adding primary storage

2012-06-11 Thread Ahmad Emneina
We'd need more logs, namely xensource.log and SMlog, from your XenServer. My assumption is that since it's already attached to the pool in question, it cant be re-added. -- æ On 6/11/12 6:50 AM, Lu Heng h...@anytimechinese.com wrote: Hi I have added successfully added two host, while I

RE: BIG-IP F5 support in cloud stack 3.0.x

2012-06-11 Thread Kevin Kluge
Dan, when we did the original F5 support in 2010 we decided not to use the domain concept. It didn't scale very well. IIRC there were at most 256 domains per device (mapping to 256 virtual networks in CloudStack terminology). This would have underutilized the device. I would suggest

RE: BIG-IP F5 support in cloud stack 3.0.x

2012-06-11 Thread Kevin Kluge
Dan, Citrix shipped a “Citrix CloudPlatform 3.0.3”. Based on the project now being run as an Apache project and feedback from the community we (Citrix hat on) did not ship a CloudStack 3.0.3. The community is working on 4.0.0 with the needed license changes as discussed in previous threads.

RE: BIG-IP F5 support in cloud stack 3.0.x

2012-06-11 Thread dan
Is CloudPlatform available for public download or it's commercial product ? Dan, Citrix shipped a “Citrix CloudPlatform 3.0.3”. Based on the project now being run as an Apache project and feedback from the community we (Citrix hat on) did not ship a CloudStack 3.0.3. The community is

RE: Networking question

2012-06-11 Thread Clayton Weise
Apologies for the late response. None of the virtual routers I have spun up have ever been on the management network. I haven't dug into it too deeply but from what I can gather based on the vNICs assigned the management server has the host backdoor in through the link-local address and

MySQL security vulnerability

2012-06-11 Thread Ewan Mellor
Anyone who's using CloudStack with MySQL, please see this _extremely_ dangerous security vulnerability in MySQL, announced on Saturday: https://community.rapid7.com/community/metasploit/blog/2012/06/11/cve-2012-2122-a-tragically-comedic-security-flaw-in-mysql Ewan.

Re: Easy task for folks looking to get involved

2012-06-11 Thread Eric
Since Chip has completed agent, agent-simulator, and python I'll begin on build. Eric Pretorious Truckee, CA From: Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 8:48 AM Subject: Re: Easy task for

RE: BIG-IP F5 support in cloud stack 3.0.x

2012-06-11 Thread Kevin Kluge
Yes, Citrix CloudPlatform is based on Apache CloudStack. You can download it from www.citrix.com. Suggest we take any further commercial discussion off list… -kevin From: d...@soleks.com [mailto:d...@soleks.com] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 11:24 AM To: Kevin Kluge Cc:

RE: Maintainer/committer model for CloudStack

2012-06-11 Thread Edison Su
I can take up KVM part. -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 7:57 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Maintainer/committer model for CloudStack So it seems we have some consensus around trying this maintainer

RE: Maintainer/committer model for CloudStack

2012-06-11 Thread Anthony Xu
I'll take XenServer and snapshot parts. Regards, Anthony -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 7:57 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Maintainer/committer model for CloudStack So it seems we have some

RE: Maintainer/committer model for CloudStack

2012-06-11 Thread Kelven Yang
I'll take VMware and console proxy Kelven -Original Message- From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:21 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Maintainer/committer model for CloudStack I'll take XenServer and snapshot parts.

RE: Maintainer/committer model for CloudStack

2012-06-11 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
I will take LDAP, Amazon SNS (todo) and XCP. Also interested in VM state sync and HA part of the middleware if these are considered 'modules'. -abhi -Original Message- From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 7:43 AM To:

Secondary storage is not working

2012-06-11 Thread Lu Heng
Hi I have secondary storage setup at management server's /data path, and while I add it to the zone, it is not working(with information server:management-server-IP path:/data), however,I can successfully mount secondary storage in the HV server, any one have idea what is wrong? -- -- Kind

Re:error while adding primary storage

2012-06-11 Thread cloudstacks
if you have assigned a target-iqn to connect ? At 2012-06-11 21:50:24,Lu Heng h...@anytimechinese.com wrote: Hi I have added successfully added two host, while I trying to add iscsi storage, I got following error Can not create storage pool through host 5 due to Catch Exception

Re: error while adding primary storage

2012-06-11 Thread Lu Heng
Hi Thanks. The problem was solved. The reason for the error is: 1. The iscsi was added before hand, in which appear it can not be added at xencenter first, it need to be added from cloudstack ui. 2. the iscsi can not have CHAP enabled. On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:26 AM, cloudsta...@163.com

RE: Secondary storage is not working

2012-06-11 Thread Nitin Mehta
Lu, Can you paste the snippet of logs where you see the error? Can you please elaborate on what you mean by secondary storage setup is not working. In my knowledge, MS doesn't validate the secondary storage path and does very basic tests while adding it. Typically I have seen the following

Re: Secondary storage is not working

2012-06-11 Thread Lu Heng
following data is the error log:(ip has been replaced, rest is same) 2012-06-11 20:00:41,530 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-369:null) Catch Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException on host:b9f6241d-cbd6-49a8-916e-dff524569dd4 for template: nfs://

RE: Secondary storage is not working

2012-06-11 Thread Nitin Mehta
Lu - Have you seeded your secondary storage with system vm templates ? That seems to be the issue here. -Original Message- From: Lu Heng [mailto:h...@anytimechinese.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 8:43 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Secondary storage is not

Re: Secondary storage is not working

2012-06-11 Thread Lu Heng
Hi Nitin: Thanks for replying. See my reply. On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote: Lu, Can you paste the snippet of logs where you see the error? Can you please elaborate on what you mean by secondary storage setup is not working. In my knowledge, MS

Re: Secondary storage is not working

2012-06-11 Thread Lu Heng
Hi some more information: Server IP:1.1.1.1(replaced with example ip, but the path is the same) path:/data preparation of the system template: /usr/lib64/cloud/agent/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt -m /data -u

RE: Secondary storage is not working

2012-06-11 Thread Nitin Mehta
Lu - With the information provided it seems that the system vm template and secondary storage have been configured correctly. Let's circle back to the error in the logs then. Can you try and manually mount the entire path (1.1.128.2:/data/template/tmpl/1/1) on the xenserver ?