This is totally not cool. Running this tool modifies not just
agent.properties, but also just appends stuff to
/etc/libvirt/{qemu.conf,libvirtd.conf} and /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd. And
due to a disagreement between the changes to qemu.conf and
sysconfig/libvirtd, manages to break libvirtd. Nice! At
This is an initial stab at the feature. Agree there is scope for improvement
and in course of time it will mature. I guess that’s the whole point of
bringing it up for discussion in the community.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Patton [mailto:mpat...@inforelay.com]
Sent:
From: Pradeep Soundararajan
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 4:13 AM
To: Murali Reddy; Alex Huang; David Nalley; Edison Su; Rajesh Battala; Kelven
Yang
Cc: Kevin Kluge; Ewan Mellor; Sudha Ponnaganti; Ram Chinta
Subject: RE: 3P removal status
Murali,
My build got failed after if I removed the
Hi,
Could you please tell me what Xen Server versions does work latest
CloudStack with?
Best regards,
Olga
Latest CloudStack works with XenServer 6.0.2
Thanks,
Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Olga Smola [mailto:olya.sm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 5:53 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Xen Server versions
Hi,
Could
Hi all,
Specific items below for Sheng Yang, David, Joe, Tech Writers
Looks like we went backwards a little bit since Friday on some of the
Java code files. We have a few API files that need to be corrected.
Sheng, can you correct these please? Alex will need to know when you
do that commit,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6607/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Sheng Yang.
Description
On 2012-08-14 07:23, Chip Childers wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Hugo Trippaers
htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Hey all,
Good to see action on this, we've been discussing this for a long
time and I think we need to get moving. At least on the building
jars front we seem to be
On 2012-08-13 22:41, Alex Huang wrote:
Shouldn't be a problem.
At least, we've thought about how this should work before. I might
even have a bug for it.
The one that I really have not thought through and I have raised on
this list and worth raising again is the following.
CloudStack Plugins
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:18 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:08 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi...
I was talking to David Nalley over IRC and we spotted two main tasks
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:09 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:18 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:08 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi...
I
-Original Message-
From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com]
Sent: 08 August 2012 05:42
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Pranav Saxena; David Nalley; Vijay Venkatachalam; Alena
Prokharchyk; Deepak Garg
Subject: RE: where features are developed was: Review
As we're pushing to get to 4.0, I wonder if it might be helpful to have
a real-time discussion at least once a week so people can report on
their progress and answer questions in real time. (For example, I think
it'd be helpful to have a docs discussion in real time.)
At a minimum, it'd be good
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:12:27PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
One more thing. Since this doesn't look like it locks us in to either
side of this equation irreversibly, if someone doesn't object in the
next 5-6 hours my intention is to request the above. Let me know if
this irks anyone.
No
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Hi all,
Specific items below for Sheng Yang, David, Joe, Tech Writers
Looks like we went backwards a little bit since Friday on some of the
Java code files. We have a few API files that need to be corrected.
Sounds great to me…I've watched a few other projects do similar, one did weekly
standup meetings with people from around the world, was pretty impressive to
see.
On Aug 14, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.netmailto:j...@zonker.net
wrote:
As we're pushing to get to 4.0, I wonder
Hi Chip,
I am also tracking this status in
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/gen/Third+party+dependencies
Please go through the status and let me know if you have any more questions.
Thanks,
Pradeep.S
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent:
On 08/14/2012 07:08 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
Sounds great to me…I've watched a few other projects do similar, one did weekly
standup meetings with people from around the world, was pretty impressive to
see.
Indeed, great idea! I've submitted my times on Doodle.
A lot of people are in the
Pradeep, you might want to consider moving this wiki to the new apache wiki for
CloudStack.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Index
-Original Message-
From: Pradeep Soundararajan [mailto:pradeep.soundarara...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:28 AM
It's actually already there (and it's the one I've been editing):
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Moving+dependencies+to+ASF+approved+licenses
Will, would you mind locking the wiki.cloudstack.org page?
Pradeep, I'll take a look at the wiki.cloudstack.org page and update
Yeah, let me work with Dave on that.
Will
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:35 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: 3P removal status
It's actually already there (and it's the one I've
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
As we're pushing to get to 4.0, I wonder if it might be helpful to have
a real-time discussion at least once a week so people can report on
their progress and answer questions in real time. (For example, I think
it'd be
Pradeep,
You noted that Paramiko has been removed, but I'm still finding it
being referenced in several files (recursive grep for paramiko
within master). Can you help out here?
Used by:
client/bindir/cloud-update-xenserver-licenses.in
tools/marvin/marvin/remoteSSHClient.py
Hi Sonny ,
I wanted to suggest an idea , not sure how feasible it is to implement or how
useful it is . But this just came to my mind , as I have been seeing posts from
the people in the recent past regarding minimizing number of clicks .
Idea -
You must have seen user interfaces where
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Kevin Kluge kevin.kl...@citrix.com wrote:
Brett/Chip, I think you're right. I probably just looked at the license text
and assumed it was modified beyond usual BSD. I suggest we get it approved
as a BSD derivative. See
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
As we're pushing to get to 4.0, I wonder if it might be helpful to have
a real-time discussion at least once a week so people can report on
their progress and answer questions in real time. (For example, I think
it'd be
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Hi all,
Specific items below for Sheng Yang, David, Joe, Tech Writers
Looks like we went backwards a little bit since Friday on some of the
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:51PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
I think this is an excellent idea and hope it continues just as a
weekly meeting for the project just for folks to give status on
things.
A couple of comments though:
* I assume since you are proposing this you are willing to act
Hi everyone,
I have been looking at what used to be cloudbridge and is now an integral part
of CS.
The old documentation for cloudbridge is at:
http://docs.cloudstack.org/@api/deki/files/165/CloudBridgeGuide.pdf
It does not seem to have been moved to /docs in publican format.
The new
Heya,
In end both ant and waf will have to go. As per recent discussions we should
leave the rpm/deb building to the distro's and focus in building the jars. In
my view also any will be used less, maybe even the other way around. Use ant
called from maven/gradle to do the few things they can't
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Kelven Yang kelven.y...@citrix.com wrote:
Underlying CloudStack infrastructure actually does not prevent you from
creating a non-isolated guest network without a VLAN, making VLAN
mandatory for these networks is unfortunately posted at CloudStack
business
Ewan, I just applied the fix to asf/master branch:
commit 60b9714cb6b58a4eea777e0ad6e564b06cf7d096
Author: Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com
Date: Tue Aug 14 13:44:51 2012 -0700
Fixed unittest for VPC - added missing implementation for some methods
in Mock classes used by the
The slides cover pretty much everything that is documented in the CP install
guide for enabling EC2. The CP install guide covers all the APIs that are
supported via EC2 Soap.
So whatever CP install guide mentions can be used for 4.0 docs as well.
I am not sure about S3 documentation.
Thanks,
Great, thanks.
Ewan.
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: 14 August 2012 13:50
To: Ewan Mellor; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: VPC unit test failure
Ewan, I just applied the fix to asf/master branch:
commit 60b9714cb6b58a4eea777e0ad6e564b06cf7d096
It will also work with the 5.6.* releases. But I'd recommend new installs
using the latest XenServer release, which is 6.0.2.
-kevin
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 5:26 AM
To:
I have made some new jobs on Jenkins: build-cloudstack-4.0, build-api-docs-4.0,
test-junit-4.0. I've also turned on email notifications for build-docs-master,
since that is stable now.
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/
Cheers,
Ewan.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6614/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Patch to use Base64 class
I have submitted a new clean patch.
Thanks,
Krishna
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 7:23 PM
To: Krishna Sadasivam
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Review Request: Plugin for enabling Brocade as
S3 information is documented here:
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/RelOps/S3+API+in+CloudStack
On 8/14/12 1:57 PM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote:
The slides cover pretty much everything that is documented in the CP
install guide for enabling EC2. The CP install guide covers all
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 11:15 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: 3P removal status
Pradeep,
You noted that Paramiko has been removed, but I'm still finding it
being
On Aug. 10, 2012, 8:36 p.m., edison su wrote:
Ship It!
Marcus Sorensen wrote:
please ship r3, looks like I beat you by only a minute, so I'm not sure
you saw it...
I added a comment on Review board, but seems I forgot to submit it...
Could you please resend a new patch, which based
The point is still valid though. Even though there's information, there needs
to be official doc. I think we should file this as a bug for the 4.0 release.
Ewan?
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012
yes, I'll create a new patch based on the master. Thanks
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:50 PM, edison su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
On Aug. 10, 2012, 8:36 p.m., edison su wrote:
Ship It!
Marcus Sorensen wrote:
please ship r3, looks like I beat you by only a minute, so I'm not sure
you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6473/#review10312
---
awsapi/src/com/cloud/bridge/io/S3CAStorBucketAdapter.java
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Pradeep,
You noted that Paramiko has been removed, but I'm still finding it
being referenced in several files (recursive grep for paramiko
within master). Can you help out here?
Used by:
On 2012-08-14 14:31, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Heya,
In end both ant and waf will have to go. As per recent discussions we
should leave the rpm/deb building to the distro's and focus in
building the jars. In my view also any will be used less, maybe even
the other way around. Use ant called from
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6615/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Adds missing bit from the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6615/#review10314
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Aug. 14, 2012, 11:26 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6325/#review10315
---
Good to me, please check it in
- edison su
On Aug. 11, 2012, 1:13
I have no clue what the technical release process is, like how you are really
going to build Apache CS and produce a release distribution. I have a good
idea of how Citrix used to do it, but for Apache CS if all we want to do is
release jars, we can stop at gradle.
I don't think Apache CS
I have a few comments:
1. The table autoscale_vmprofiles has account_id as well as user_id. Only
account_id should be sufficient?
2. The table 'counter' and 'condition' should be renamed so that it is
clear that it is autoscaling related. So also the corresponding Java
classes, APIs and interfaces
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6473/
---
(Updated Aug. 15, 2012, 2:29 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
On Aug. 14, 2012, 10:18 p.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
awsapi/src/com/cloud/bridge/io/S3CAStorBucketAdapter.java, line 72
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6473/diff/2/?file=135872#file135872line72
This logic seems suspect: if the port is not specified or if only the
port is specified.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6618/
---
Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley and Chip Childers.
Description
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 11:52 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS40] IRC Meeting for Release Tasks?
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:51PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
I think this is
We also have floated the idea of enabling anyone to create a valid system
VM image, by defining the interface and operational requirements (perhaps
also by providing puppet configuration manifests). I really like this idea,
and
some of the work required to make that a possibility might be
Only releasing jar files is certainly not the idea. Next to that there is other
stuff that we need to do like building system vms and stuff.
My idea was more to see if maven/gradle can be the leading build tool, driving
other tools to do the other jobs.
I would still like to see what you have
On 8/14/12 6:20 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
I'm trying to kick off conversation with this thread...
I know that people have been looking at the System VM licensing and
distribution issues from various angles, but I'm not sure we came to a
consensus on how to deal with
58 matches
Mail list logo
