adding and removing the ip for nic using the APIs
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
for supporting multiple ip address per nic for shared networks
Diffs
-
server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java 8303b0b
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10040/diff/
Testing
---
1. Tested adding and removing the ip for nic using the APIs
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
., Jayapal Reddy wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9894/
---
(Updated March 13, 2013, 8:32 a.m.)
Review request
/api/response/NicSecondaryIpResponse.java
3464a63
server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseHelper.java fbfc955
server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java ba55ff8
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9893/diff/
Testing
---
Unit Tested the chagnes
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
83d7ad1
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9894/diff/
Testing
---
1. Tested security group rules for nic secondary ip
2. VM reboot and tested security group rules adding and removing.
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
Hi Brain,
I have the following suggestions on the UI mock pages in the bug.
1. Place Acquire IP in the nic-view-all.jpg page nic 1(default) heading right
side end.
2. In nic-port-forwarding-select-ip.jpg
place IP drop down column after the VM name. Also please change the column
name to VM
63ef874
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9730/diff/
Testing
---
Unit Tests done:
1. adding a secondary ip to nic
2. remove ip from nic
3. reaching public network from the VM.
4. security groups changes for the secondary ip are done.
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9750/#review17445
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jayapal Reddy
On March 5, 2013, 1:29 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9730/#review17417
---
On March 4, 2013, 1:18 p.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote
reboot, the NIC interface name changes, CS uses log to
rebuild SG rules for this VM. can you check if VM SG rules are deleted
after you shutdown VM through xencenter?
- I didn't see the change for KVM, is this feature only for XS.
Jayapal Reddy wrote:
I tested the vm reboot case
a secondary ip to nic
2. remove ip from nic
3. reaching public network from the VM.
4. security groups changes for the secondary ip are done.
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
Hi David,
The test cases for this feature are added in the AddIpToVmNicTest.java file.
In review board after your comments uploaded a new patch (r2) with the test
cases added.
Please let me know If I miss any thing.
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley
4349bd0
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9396/diff/
Testing
---
Tested add adding, deleting and listing addresses on the nic using APIs
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
-410to420.sql 4349bd0
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9396/diff/
Testing
---
Tested add adding, deleting and listing addresses on the nic using APIs
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13590465#comment-13590465
]
Jayapal Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-1337:
---
In your case in basic zone
Hi Deepthi,
Can you check the routes the ssvm.
On which interface the default route is set ?
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Deepti Dohare [mailto:deepti.doh...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 3:22 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Copy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy resolved CLOUDSTACK-1264.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
It is not reproduced on KVM hypervisor.
In xen
/r/9396/diff/
Testing
---
Tested add adding, deleting and listing addresses on the nic using APIs
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
ba3dd41
server/test/com/cloud/vpc/MockNetworkManagerImpl.java 828a555
setup/db/db/schema-410to420.sql 4349bd0
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9396/diff/
Testing
---
Tested add adding, deleting and listing addresses on the nic using APIs
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9396/#review17023
---
On Feb. 26, 2013, 4:47 p.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e
Jayapal Reddy created CLOUDSTACK-1372:
-
Summary: nTier Apps 2.0 : Support Cisco ASA as external LB
provider
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1372
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1372
review the changes Jayapal is going to make to
security groups for additional ips.
-abhi
On 14/02/13 8:13 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
wrote:
Anthony,
What is the best way to work on xenserver vmops.
I am writing new methods in vmops file for security groups
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13582964#comment-13582964
]
Jayapal Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-24:
-
Submitted the patch for isolated
,
Jayapal Reddy
control over output from an existing API.
-abhi
On 30/01/13 12:58 AM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
wrote:
On 1/29/13 8:23 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
wrote:
listNicIps/listNicSecondaryIps API lists the only the secondary ip
addresses .
do
/8813/#comment35168
TCP, UDP, ICMP and ALL protocol.
Please add the 'ALL' also.
Protocol 'ALL' is allow all the traffic.
- Jayapal Reddy
On Feb. 6, 2013, 6:26 a.m., Radhika PC wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13545680#comment-13545680
]
Jayapal Reddy edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-299 at 2/12/13 5:07 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13545680#comment-13545680
]
Jayapal Reddy edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-299 at 2/12/13 5:08 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13576384#comment-13576384
]
Jayapal Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-299:
--
The egress firewall rules feature
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575612#comment-13575612
]
Jayapal Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-24:
-
Feature github development branch
Hi Vijay,
The guest network CIDR won't change. We can configure PF, static NAT rules for
nic secondary ip addreses.
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Vijay Venkatachalam
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 3:25 PM
To: Abhinandan Prateek; Jayapal Reddy Uradi; Pranav Saxena
Cc
Hi Sailaja,
Please check the below commit for the log in issue. For me this solved the log
in issue.
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=2a0c2be1365b042fcabc2ab18c1ba4f374c5ce37
CLOUDSTACK-1175: PlainTextAuthenticator was being loaded due @Component
returning TrafficType.Egress
- Jayapal Reddy
On Feb. 6, 2013, 12:32 a.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9313
/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/firewall/ListEgressFirewallRulesCmd.java
6eeb536
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9236/diff/
Testing
---
Unit tested:
list and delete egress firewall rules from UI
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
Saxena
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:10 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Abhinandan Prateek
Cc: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Subject: RE: [RESULT] [IP Clearance] Citrix donation of egress firewall
manipulation for guest network - API issue
I just happened to build his latest asf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-1114:
--
Attachment: error.png
screen shot
unable to execute
Congrats Koushik !
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 9:39 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: new committer: Koushik Das
CongratsŠnow commit the code you reviewed :)
On 01/02/13 8:02 AM,
Found the issue, the parameter is command type is LONG.
Fixing it to UUID. Filed bug for this CLOUDSTACK-1114
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 7:46 AM
To: Pranav Saxena; cloudstack
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9236/diff/
Testing
---
Unit tested:
list and delete egress firewall rules from UI
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
port 22 traffic.
3. Remaining traffic got blocked.
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
addreses.
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 9:15 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC
Hi Chiradeep.
Thanks
abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com
wrote:
Jayapal,
The FS seems to be updated with the feedback received on the forum,
I guess you can start implementation.
-abhi
On 18/01/13 4:33 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
wrote:
Update the FS with the below discussions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-779:
-
Summary: Specify Egress Rules on VR/Physical Devices (Byron) (was: Specify
egress
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-779:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
Summary: Specify
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-299:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.2.0)
4.1.0
Egress firewall rules
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-779:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
Specify egress rules
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-779:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.2.0)
4.1.0
Specify egress rules
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-868:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
nTier Apps 2.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-869:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
nTier Apps 2.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-299:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
Egress firewall rules
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-749:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
nTier Apps 2.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-809:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
Affects Version
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-902:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
QA Multiples IP's
12:51 PM
To: CloudStack DeveloperList
Subject: Re: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC
I hope we consider the case when the ip is removed from the nic while there
is a PF rule to that ip.
On 1/16/13 9:10 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi
/9010/diff/
Testing
---
Unit testing:
1. Created egress rule for tcp port 22 from cloudstack UI.
2. After adding the rule it allows tcp port 22 traffic.
3. Remaining traffic got blocked.
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
Hi,
I'd like to start the process of IP Clearance for
CLOUDSTACK-299https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-29https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2979:Egress
firewall rules for guest network.
Citrix would like to donate this code to Apache Cloudstack.
Using egress
discussion link as well as link to code for
review. Please post them ASAP
-Original Message-
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 9:55 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [IP Clearance: CLOUDSTACK-299
on the multi-IP
feature?
On Dec 18, 2012, at 2:03 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
Regarding IP limit, it can be made as configurable using global settings
and
default value will be 30.
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep
Hi,
I am starting the IP clearance process for the Citrix Egress firewall rules
feature.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-299
Citrix would like to donate the egress firewall rules feature to Apache
cloudstack.
About this feature, Currently all the guest network traffic in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13545663#comment-13545663
]
Jayapal Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-779:
--
This features needs consensus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy reassigned CLOUDSTACK-373:
Assignee: Sheng Yang (was: Jayapal Reddy)
Sheng worked on changes related
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13545680#comment-13545680
]
Jayapal Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-299:
--
For VR there is bug https
I to don't have the edit access.
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 4:07 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Edit access to Jira
Can someone with right level of karma
the limitation of having 30 IPs per interface. Modern OSes
can support way more.
Why no support for basic networking? I can see a small hosting provider
with a basic setup wanting to manage web servers...
John
On Dec 14, 2012, at 9:37 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
Hi All,
Current guest VM by default having one NIC and one IP address assigned.
If your wants extra IP for the guest VM, there no provision from the CS.
Using multiple IP address per NIC feature CS can associate IP address for the
NIC, user can take that IP and assign it to the VM.
Please
Updated the Egress firewall rules FS.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Egress+firewall+rules+for+guest+network
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 8:12 PM
Jayapal Reddy created CLOUDSTACK-373:
Summary: static NAT and Firewall is not working on external
firewall device SRX, it needs to be implemented
Key: CLOUDSTACK-373
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira
-Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 7:43 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alena Prokharchyk
Subject: RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the
SRX
Hi Sangeetha,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Sangeetha Hariharan
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 4:35 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Subject: RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation
firewall rules for guest network.
On 10/16/12 8:34 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
wrote:
Though CreateNetworkACL and CreateFirewallRule APIs are configuring
the firewall rules, but there is difference in the purpose for which
it is used
Hi Sangeetha,
Once concern in doing that is effect on existing deployments.
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Sangeetha Hariharan
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:56 PM
To: Jayapal Reddy Uradi; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alena
Prokharchyk
Subject: RE
Please see my comments inline.
-Jayapal
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 10:04 PM
To: Jayapal Reddy Uradi; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur
Updated the FS as per the discussion.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Static+NAT,+Port+Forwarding+and+Firewall+Implementation+on+SRX
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16
for configuring firewall rules
per public IP.
Thanks,
Jayapal
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Xu
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 6:38 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Subject: RE: Egress firewall rules for guest network
Hi Alena,
Please see my comments inline,
-Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 10:19 PM
To: Jayapal Reddy Uradi; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the
SRX
Jayapal
Hi Nilesh,
Please fine my inline comments.
Thanks,
Jayapal
From: Nilesh Vishwakarma
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 6:37 PM
To: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Egress Firewall Rules feature FS
Hey,
My review comments on Egress Firewall Rules feature FS
Alena,
Please find my inline comments.
Thanks,
Jayapal
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 5:54 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Subject: Re: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation
StaticNAT, PortForwarding and Firewall current functionality in SRX is not
similar to the Virtual router.
This functional spec describes the what configuration possible on the SRX and
also the limitation of SRX compared to the functionality in VR.
Please find the functional spec here:
Congrats Edison!
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 9:19 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: New PPMC member: Edison Su
Congrats Edison!
From: Ahmad Emneina
,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 8:41 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Egress firewall rules for guest network.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 10:43 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Egress firewall rules for guest network.
On 10/9/12 8:10 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
The egress
The egress firewall rules feature will configure the egress rules for guest
network on VR/External firewall to ALLOW
specified traffic to outside and BLOCK the remaining traffic.
By default all the traffic is ALLOWED to public network. When you specify a
egress rule only that rule specific
Jayapal Reddy created CLOUDSTACK-299:
Summary: Egress firewall rules for guest network
Key: CLOUDSTACK-299
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-299
Project: CloudStack
: Egress firewall rules for guest network.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
The egress firewall rules feature will configure the egress rules for
guest network on VR/External firewall to ALLOW
specified traffic to outside and BLOCK
all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0
root@r-17-VRDLAB:~#
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
Debug the traffic flow ... whether the traffic sent to VR guest
network interface then public interface .
Please share the VR
Using firewall and port forwarding rules only we can access the VM services
from the public network also from the VMs using the Public IPs.
For you telnet from outside network success but from failed from VM to VM
using public IP.
Seems hair pin NAT got failed ...
Please capture the packets
wrote:
Hi,
The telnet packets are not reaching the telnet server VM.
I'm using CS 3.0.2.
Thanks for replying !
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
Using firewall and port forwarding rules only we can access the VM
services
on adv zone vpc VM
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
.
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
Hi Gavin,
There is a mistake while committing VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java to
ASF, changes applied incorrectly.
The new changes are committed to ASF.
You can't change to findByNetworkIdAndType because it will cause wrong dns ip
to VM in multiple pods case.
Thanks for finding the
with VR and external firewall SRX
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
. created basic zone with two pods pod1, pod2.
2. Added xen host in pod1, pod2
3. Created two VMs in each pod.
4. observed that each VM is getting its corresponding router ip as dns IP.
5. Advacned zone creating vm is success.
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
in each pod.
4. observed that each VM is getting its corresponding router ip as dns IP.
5. Advacned zone creating vm is success.
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5742/diff/
Testing
---
Yes
Thanks,
Jayapal Reddy
95 matches
Mail list logo
