[mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 7:26 PM
To: Radhika Puthiyetath
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Sangeetha Hariharan; Sheng Yang
Subject: Re: [ACS41][DOCS]updating pots and po files
Radhika,
The 22nd was the date that we were going to cut our first RC... So I
What blocked you is not ssl keystore, it's ssh key. As it said:
NFO [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:) Going to update
systemvm iso with generated keypairs if needed
Password:
I just found recently we need to input the password many times, then
with latest build I only need to
/incubator-cloudstack/tree/630e7559
Diff:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/diff/630e7559
Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: 630e75596ed6a4cf769b24900d383a05ebb25cdc
Parents: bf15eb0
Author: Sheng Yang sheng.y...@citrix.com
Authored: Tue Mar 12 18:24:31 2013 -0700
Sorry missed it at first place...
The reason is our logic in the VR scripts would presume that source
nat is enabled, if we want to enable other services. For example, if
you don't want to enable source nat, then we assume you only want to
run VR as a dhcp server, then we won't bring up
, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:50:20PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
Hi,
Since we didn't plan to include ipv6 template as default for 4.1
release
with this feature will likely
be okay with the experimental template downloaded out of band too. Is this
going to be documented somewhere?
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:00:26AM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7
Already checked in master.
commit e35ce6587a2519fdbc56e8859ad6aa7dac00dd47
Author: Sheng Yang sheng.y...@citrix.com
Date: Fri Mar 8 17:42:06 2013 -0800
CLOUDSTACK-1461: Don't set dns server for non-default ipv6 network
The non-default parameter can be used by ipv4 as well
, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi Dave,
I've been catching up on IPv6 plans by reading the functional specs
and Jira tickets - it's great to have so much material to refer to.
I still
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi Dave,
I've been catching up on IPv6 plans by reading the functional specs
and Jira tickets - it's great to have so much material to refer to.
I still have a few questions though, and I'm hoping someone involved
Hi,
Since we didn't plan to include ipv6 template as default for 4.1
release, is it necessary to revert the UI part of IPv6 to avoid
confusion in 4.1? We can support API only for 4.1
--Sheng
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:50:20PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
Hi,
Since we didn't plan to include ipv6 template as default for 4.1
release, is it necessary to revert the UI part of IPv6 to avoid
confusion in 4.1? We
commit 27ba0208f068e60f588d25a5d0ad9c4d6503ad14
Author: Sheng Yang sheng.y...@citrix.com
Date: Wed Mar 6 16:49:44 2013 -0800
CLOUDSTACK-1315: Fix NPE when try to upgrade network from VR to SRX-F5
Still return a valid object when reverting non-existed rules.
Thanks.
--Sheng
Same with 4.1, I am using Linux.
After re-deploydb, it would happen.
--Sheng
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote:
I've noticed that on every cloudStack management server startup, the
public RSA key gets overridden (vi ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub). I'm
commit 7602997b90232c3b11a3dfbf69e9f9cccfe898f6
Author: Sheng Yang sheng.y...@citrix.com
Date: Tue Mar 5 14:25:04 2013 -0800
CLOUDSTACK-1521: Stop services after switch to BACKUP
--Sheng
Btw, the commit is in MASTER right now, and tested.
--Sheng
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
commit 7602997b90232c3b11a3dfbf69e9f9cccfe898f6
Author: Sheng Yang sheng.y...@citrix.com
Date: Tue Mar 5 14:25:04 2013 -0800
CLOUDSTACK-1521: Stop services
Applied.
Thanks.
--Sheng
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Please go ahead and apply it to 4.1. I'm not going to be at a terminal
tonight. Looks good to me.
On Mar 5, 2013, at 7:17 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Btw, the commit
Need to save to wiki...
--Sheng
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Another tip I have is to create one source repo and workspace for one major
branch. We've been changing our environment a lot and it really messes with
the whole git checkout branch and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13590830#comment-13590830
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1389:
Fail to input on SSL keystore
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13591159#comment-13591159
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1481:
What's the result of nslookup
Thank Rohit!
I would try this template for ipv6 later...
--Sheng
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:
wow, roll your own template sounds awesome. Rohit == awesomesauce
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13591185#comment-13591185
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1481:
According to Anthony, we would only
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
On 2/27/13 10:12 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Per this case, if people thinks systemvm template can be hosted alone,
I would suggest use the tested ipv6 template for the whole 4.1
release, to avoid
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
On 2/27/13 10:12 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Per this case, if people thinks systemvm template can be hosted alone,
I would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13590164#comment-13590164
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1461:
It's not related to IPv6. The ipv4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1463.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Guest configuration issue, not controlled by CloudStack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1464.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Guest configuration issue, not controlled by CloudStack.
Don't
the correct system VM.
As long as we document it, I think that option A is the right one.
Other thoughts?
On 2/26/13 10:15 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
When I first report the bug
https://issues.apache.org/jira
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang updated CLOUDSTACK-1170:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
Redundant router: MAC addresses are different for additional
has:
http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.ova
Can Sheng, Kelven, or anyone else shed light on this? Or is this question
now moot, given the discussion on this thread?
Jessica T.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Per this case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1394.
Resolution: Not A Problem
Please check the status of LB rule. It should still in Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang updated CLOUDSTACK-1389:
---
Priority: Major (was: Blocker)
The cloud.keystore is generated just in case customer
Sorry I didn't aware the new systemvm template is for 4.2, I thought
it's for 4.1
Because we cannot use old systemvm template due to the version of
dnsmasq is old. We need to have to generate new systemvm template with
newer dnsmasq, since IPv6 is already a part of 4.1.
The IPv6 template I
Sheng Yang created CLOUDSTACK-1414:
--
Summary: Redundant router: BACKUP switch cancelled due to lock
timeout after a glitch in network
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1414
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1414.
Resolution: Fixed
Redundant router: BACKUP switch cancelled due to lock timeout
When I first report the bug
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066
I've set the target for 4.1 because of ipv6 need.
When Rohit fixed it, it was changed to 4.2, sorry I didn't aware of that.
--Sheng
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
-
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 2:15 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: What are the System VM Templates for ASF 4.1 Release?
When I first report the bug
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066
I've set
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13587962#comment-13587962
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1232:
dnsmasq doesn't support it. We would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1232.
Resolution: Fixed
Ipv6 - Guest Vms are not able to get Ipaddress when executing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1321.
Resolution: Invalid
[Site-to-Site VPN] No events are generated in case of status
You mean Windows? I don't think we would recommend CS on windows, many
people already got enough trouble with it.
The generated result used for SSL communication. For deployment, it
would be needed to generate different key for different mgmt servers.
For developer it's not necessary.
If we want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1332.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in 4.1 and master.
IPV6 - Router and guest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1369.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in 4.1 and master.
Ipv6 - In dual Stack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13586682#comment-13586682
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1369:
Fixed as a part of CLOUDSTACK-1332
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1288.
Resolution: Fixed
[F5-SRX-InlineMode] classCastException during network restart
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1315.
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Cannot reproduce with latest 4.1 branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13583636#comment-13583636
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1205:
Sangeetha, is it still an issue? I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1319:
--
Assignee: Jessica Wang (was: Sheng Yang)
createCustomerVpnGateway response
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13583671#comment-13583671
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1303:
You didn't extend ip6_range
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1368:
--
Assignee: (was: Sheng Yang)
I don't know this part or state machine
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1303.
Resolution: Fixed
Ipv6 - java.lang.NullPointerException when executing
I think I can update the version to 0.10, should be fine.
And please make sure 0.10 doesn't miss license things.
--Sheng
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Sheng,
Do you think that we can use this new version (with the clarified
copyright and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13582553#comment-13582553
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1115:
Probably we should close this bug
Got this error when try to get a new IP for network(using SRX as firewall).
Column 'queue_proc_time' cannot be null
--Sheng
logs:
ERROR [cloud.async.SyncQueueManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-16:job-16)
Unexpected exception:
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: DB Exception on:
And it's 4.1 latest.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Got this error when try to get a new IP for network(using SRX as firewall).
Column 'queue_proc_time' cannot be null
--Sheng
logs:
ERROR [cloud.async.SyncQueueManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-16:job-16
Reproduced with normal isolated network.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
And it's 4.1 latest.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Got this error when try to get a new IP for network(using SRX as firewall).
Column
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13582656#comment-13582656
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1321:
Restart VPC is not in the detection
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1292.
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of CLOUDSTACK-1288, because the shutdown process
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13582720#comment-13582720
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1347:
Same error shows when try to acquire
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13582721#comment-13582721
]
Sheng Yang edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-1347 at 2/21/13 12:32 AM
It would happen if it's not product version, when mgmt server try to
generate ssl keystore for ssl communcation, but it would need
supervisor privilege to do so.
So if user doesn't have supervisor privilege, it would fail - which
shouldn't happen in deployment environment, but likely in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1349.
Resolution: Duplicate
Sounds like duplicate of CLOUDSTACK-1347.
VPC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1347:
--
Assignee: Kelven Yang
Not able to delete network. Error - Unable to insert
Db upgrade path for ipv6 on 4.1/master done.
--Sheng
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Following people please reply:
Edison, Sheng, Kishan, Hugo Vijay.
Koushik, please reply and fix the max host per cluster changes in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9514/#review16761
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sheng Yang
On Feb. 19, 2013, 10:43 a.m
)
nics.ip6_gateway seems related to several recent IPv6 SQL changes by Sheng
Yang, so I've CCed him - Sheng, could you take a look at this?
I do get the Duplicate column name 'image_data_store_id' Jessica mentions,
but only the second time I run the management server - that indicates to me
that the core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578585#comment-13578585
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1232:
it's a bug of dnsmasq we're using. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578804#comment-13578804
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1094:
It's purely guest OS bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578811#comment-13578811
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1094:
In Ubuntu 12.10, /sbin/dhclient
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1094.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Ipv6 - hostname/hostname --fqdn does not return the name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1219.
Resolution: Fixed
Ipv6 - Provide better error messages when deploying a Vm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1220.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed at:
Commit 5ec29e9608cc6fa9ad28dea3bfd98aa188dfb642
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang updated CLOUDSTACK-1218:
---
Summary: IPv6: Shared Network - After network restart with clean option ,
router
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-677.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Complete the fix at:
commit 78ca6ceefe2af9293d1ac10fecb95f5cd9e3a93e
I've added dependency for java-ipv6(apache2 license) package for utils.
http://code.google.com/p/java-ipv6/
--Sheng
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Hi all,
Hoping that everyone that has worked on new features for 4.1 can take a
moment to help
Yes, it's sufficient for now, except ipv6.
We're working on to generated an systemvm template for ipv6 right now.
--Sheng
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
I'm testing CS 4.1, curious if Burbank systemvm image is sufficient?
Thanks
ilya
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13577310#comment-13577310
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1242:
It's Chiradeep's network refactor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1242.
Resolution: Fixed
[F5-SRX-InlineMode] Failed to create LB rule with F5-SRX
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13575955#comment-13575955
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-703:
---
The subtask is target for 4.1, I would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang updated CLOUDSTACK-703:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
Site-to-Site VPN 2.0
New Feature CLOUDSTACK-703 Site-to-Site VPN 2.0 Enhancements Sheng Yang
This one has sub-task target for 4.1(which is already done), so people
initially make the parent target to 4.1 as well. But I think it should
be 4.2 anyway, because the part in 4.1 is already done.
Change the target
that when we talked.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 5:36 PM
To: Animesh Chaturvedi
Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; Abhijith Chandrashekar; John
Kinsella; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org cloudstack-
d
to the other dozen or so mailing lists
that I'm subscribed to.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013, at 06:00 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to call for a vote for reverting back to the old mailing list
mechanism, which would add Reply-To: mailing list to every mail it
send out.
And I need to declare that I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1095.
Resolution: Fixed
Please refer to the spec on how to configure the guest for get IPv6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13576335#comment-13576335
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1220:
How?...
Ipv6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang updated CLOUDSTACK-1139:
---
Summary: After the Vm is Expunged we see the entry still being present in
the router
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang updated CLOUDSTACK-1218:
---
Summary: Shared Network - After network restart with clean option , router
is assigned
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
Thanks for all the advise. This is very helpful. I will put together a
spec for this as soon as I have a chance.
Sheng: Thanks for the offer, I am sure I will take you up on it at some
point. You and I worked
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 06:46:26PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 04:00:46PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
Hi all
: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 11:36 AM
To: Sheng Yang
Cc: Alex Huang; Brett Porter; Animesh Chaturvedi; David Nalley; Edison Su;
sebastien goasguen; Daniel Kulp; htrippa...@schubergphilis.com; Marcus
Sorensen; somikbeh...@vmware.com; Frank Zhang; w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1107.
Resolution: Fixed
Ipv6 - Unable to extend Ip range for a Ipv6 network using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13574963#comment-13574963
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1218:
The issue is the same as ipv4, we
Well, I think it's user group? Do we want to focus on the development
- even demonstrating an plugin development?
--Sheng
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Abhijith Chandrashekar
abhijith.chandrashe...@citrix.com wrote:
John, can this session be recorded? I will not be in the area on that date..
check the agenda, we plan to cover writing plugins as one of the
talks
Animesh
-Original Message-
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 4:52 PM
To: Abhijith Chandrashekar
Cc: John Kinsella; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org cloudstack-
d
...@apache.org wrote:
On 07/02/2013, at 12:05 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
The previous setting won't respect CC after the CCed guy replied
mail.
I don't think that's useful.
I truly believe it's developer's responsible to keep track of their
own topic, but I also
problem!
Can we please ask to have the change reverted?
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 07/02/2013, at 12:05 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote
by Alex in the previous mail)[2], titled `Reply-To Munging
Considered Harmful`.
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.6.2
[2] http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
--Sheng
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
OK, I would call a formal vote myself
Hi all,
I'd like to call for a vote for reverting back to the old mailing list
mechanism, which would add Reply-To: mailing list to every mail it
send out.
And I need to declare that I would vote *-1* on this revert.
Whatever you voted in the previous mail, I suggested to read the whole
mail
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Even though I don't feel strongly about this functionality, the way
the vote itself was presented bothers me. Clearly, if you want an
email thread to be treated as a public topic that all responses
automatically stick
, as I said in the paragraph.
The reason matters.
--Sheng
On Feb 7, 2013 6:40 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
wrote:
Even though I don't feel strongly about this functionality, the way
the vote itself
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:10 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Even though I don't feel strongly about this functionality, the way
the vote itself was presented bothers me. Clearly, if you want an
email thread to be
1 - 100 of 317 matches
Mail list logo
