2011/12/27 Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca:
Hi Alan,
The issue is that if I set CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH to find a special
version of lapack/blas, only the lapack part of that is honored. For
example, if I set
export CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/software/lapack/install_double/lib
Did you
2011/12/30 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com:
There is no conservative course here. There is a choice of whether to make
CMake 2.8.7 behave the same as 2.8.6 or the same as 2.8.5.
For this to be a showstopper it would have had to be reported before we
tagged 2.8.6 -- since it is now already
On 2011-12-30 11:22+0100 Eric Noulard wrote:
2011/12/30 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com:
There is no conservative course here. There is a choice of whether to make
CMake 2.8.7 behave the same as 2.8.6 or the same as 2.8.5.
For this to be a showstopper it would have had to be reported
On 2011-12-30 11:06+0100 Eric Noulard wrote:
2011/12/27 Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca:
Hi Alan,
The issue is that if I set CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH to find a special
version of lapack/blas, only the lapack part of that is honored. For
example, if I set
export
I have investigated further, and I now think Dave is right with his
desire to go ahead with the release of the rc2 versions of the
lapack/blas find modules. (Sorry, Dave, for this flip-flop at the
last minute, but such deeper investigations take time.)
What appears to be going on is that in
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.cawrote:
I have investigated further, and I now think Dave is right with his
desire to go ahead with the release of the rc2 versions of the
lapack/blas find modules. (Sorry, Dave, for this flip-flop at the
last minute, but
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.cawrote:
On 2011-12-21 20:42-0500 David Cole wrote:
The CMake 2.8.7 release candidate stream continues! You can find the
source and binaries here:
On 2011-12-29 18:34-0500 David Cole wrote:
I've considered your plea, but after looking at the diffs between 2.8.5 and
2.8.7-rc2, I think we ought to keep what we have and
continue moving forward with it.
The commits involved are easily seen with these git commands:
$ gitk v2.8.5..a1c9de56
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.cawrote:
On 2011-12-29 18:34-0500 David Cole wrote:
I've considered your plea, but after looking at the diffs between 2.8.5
and 2.8.7-rc2, I think we ought to keep what we have and
continue moving forward with it.
The
On 2011-12-21 20:42-0500 David Cole wrote:
The CMake 2.8.7 release candidate stream continues! You can find the
source and binaries here:
http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D
This will become the final build of CMake 2.8.7 next Wednesday unless
somebody finds and reports a showstopping
The CMake 2.8.7 release candidate stream continues! You can find the
source and binaries here:
http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D
This email is also available as a blog post:
http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/216
Some of the notable changes in this release are:
- improved Eclipse
The CMake 2.8.7 release candidate stream continues! You can find the
source and binaries here:
http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D
This will become the final build of CMake 2.8.7 next Wednesday unless
somebody finds and reports a showstopping (crasher, serious behavioral
regression) issue
12 matches
Mail list logo
