Am 06.09.2012 09:43, schrieb Anton Sibilev:
Hi all!
I'm making shared library with add_library(xxx SHARED xxx.c) and as
result I got 'libxxx.so'.
I want to create lib with name like 'libxxx.so.1', can you please help,
how to make this?
Point is not to create link or copy libxxx.so -
On 09/06/2012 09:43 AM, Anton Sibilev wrote:
Hi all!
I'm making shared library with add_library(xxx SHARED xxx.c) and as
result I got 'libxxx.so'.
I want to create lib with name like 'libxxx.so.1', can you please help,
how to make this?
Point is not to create link or copy libxxx.so -
Am 06.09.2012 09:43, schrieb Anton Sibilev:
Hi all!
I'm making shared library with add_library(xxx SHARED xxx.c) and as
result I got 'libxxx.so'.
I want to create lib with name like 'libxxx.so.1', can you please
help, how to make this?
Point is not to create link or copy libxxx.so -
2012/9/6 Anton Sibilev anton.sibi...@gmail.com:
Hi all!
I'm making shared library with add_library(xxx SHARED xxx.c) and as result I
got 'libxxx.so'.
I want to create lib with name like 'libxxx.so.1', can you please help, how
to make this?
set_target_properties(xxx PROPERTIES VERSION 1.0.0
Am Donnerstag, 6. September 2012 um 10:01:36 schrieb Michael Wild:
On 09/06/2012 09:43 AM, Anton Sibilev wrote:
Hi all!
I'm making shared library with add_library(xxx SHARED xxx.c) and as
result I got 'libxxx.so'.
I want to create lib with name like 'libxxx.so.1', can you please help,
On 09/06/2012 10:05 AM, Benjamin Eikel wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 6. September 2012 um 10:01:36 schrieb Michael Wild:
On 09/06/2012 09:43 AM, Anton Sibilev wrote:
Hi all!
I'm making shared library with add_library(xxx SHARED xxx.c) and as
result I got 'libxxx.so'.
I want to create lib with name
On 09/06/2012 10:09 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
On 09/06/2012 10:05 AM, Benjamin Eikel wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 6. September 2012 um 10:01:36 schrieb Michael Wild:
On 09/06/2012 09:43 AM, Anton Sibilev wrote:
Hi all!
I'm making shared library with add_library(xxx SHARED xxx.c) and as
result I got
Hi,
I use armcc to compile webkit.
It need to support options --md --depend=$(@:%.o=%.d) which in rules
.c.o:
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $
will be replaced its name to object name to create right dependence file.
e.g compile test.c
then before compiling, it will be changed into --md
Hi,
I am no CMake expert, but I would test on an identical file system types...
I am pretty sure that ntfs and ext3fs don't have the same read-write access
latency and this might explain your time difference.
You could additionally launch a strace on the two settings and see if there
are major
Hi guys,
I noticed that In the latest release (well in the last rc now in stable
release), minmin added support for an arm generator for windows 8. Can I use
cmake to generate a windows 8 modern ui solution file for vs 11 (aka 2012)?
and if so how?
--
View this message in context:
Using autoconf, I could specify a numerical option using AC_ARG_ENABLE.
This was useful for specifying a logging level at compile time. I could
pass --enable-logging=8 to the configure script to enable deep logging. Is
there a way to do this with cmake? Seems like option only allows yes or
no
On 09/06/2012 04:15 PM, Jack Stalnaker wrote:
Using autoconf, I could specify a numerical option using AC_ARG_ENABLE.
This was useful for specifying a logging level at compile time. I could
pass --enable-logging=8 to the configure script to enable deep logging.
Is there a way to do this with
2012/9/6 Michael Wild them...@gmail.com:
On 09/06/2012 04:15 PM, Jack Stalnaker wrote:
Using autoconf, I could specify a numerical option using AC_ARG_ENABLE.
This was useful for specifying a logging level at compile time. I could
pass --enable-logging=8 to the configure script to enable deep
winrt apps are written in C#/WPF
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Martell martellmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I noticed that In the latest release (well in the last rc now in stable
release), minmin added support for an arm generator for windows 8. Can I use
cmake to generate a windows 8
This probably just means there's an error with double-quoting (or lack
of it) in the script.
Can you post the script?
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, David Gobbi david.go...@gmail.com wrote:
This might have already been answered on the list but it didn't come
up in a search.
Someone that I
On 9/6/2012 5:56 AM, Amine Chadly wrote:
Hi,
I am no CMake expert, but I would test on an identical file system types...
I am pretty sure that ntfs and ext3fs don't have the same read-write
access latency and this might explain your time difference.
You could additionally launch a strace on the
Hi,
I have a c++ library with some wrappers.
The wrappers are in two folders ./Wrappers/C and ./Wrappers/Python
The python 'target' and its install is just some python files. However it
depends on the C wrapper being built and installed first. How do I express that
in the CMakeList in the
Hi, list!
I have a library target named 'TestLib', path is
./src/libs/testlib_src_dir'
And now I made a execute named 'TestApp', path is './src/app'
I try to link TestLib using:
target_link_libraries(TestApp TestLib)
My question:
How to get the 'TestLib' target's source direcory (want get
Hi, Yuchen,
On Friday, September 07, 2012 08:43:02 AM Loaden wrote:
Hi, list!
I have a library target named 'TestLib', path is
./src/libs/testlib_src_dir'
And now I made a execute named 'TestApp', path is './src/app'
I try to link TestLib using:
target_link_libraries(TestApp TestLib)
INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES( ${FOO_SOURCE_DIR} )
# FOO here comes from the PROJECT() line in the other CMakeLists.txt
I don't want to add project(FOO) in my target'sCMakeLists.txt.
Because it is really not a real project, only a library target.
Does there exist other way?
I've seen your English
Am Mittwoch, 5. September 2012 um 22:29:59 schrieb Bill Hoffman:
On 9/5/2012 3:11 PM, Benjamin Eikel wrote:
That might become a problem. I tried
codeblocks --build --target=MyTarget MyProject.cbp
which works and builds the specified target inside the project. But that
opens a log
On 05.09.2012 20:54, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Something like
$ codeblocks --build foo.cbp
Ah, a new build system ;)
This is more or less necessary so cmake can run its test suite to verify the
generator works correctly.
Alex
--
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
Hello there,
I really have the need get some configuration dependent compiler flags
into my CMake projects. For linker stage properties
LINKER_FLAGS_CONFIG exist, unfortunately COMPILE_FLAGS_CONFIG do
not. I want to change that myself and would be very happy if some
experienced developers
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13520
==
Reported By:Bjoern Thiel
Assigned To:
Am 06.09.2012 11:13, schrieb Michael Stürmer:
Hello there,
I really have the need get some configuration dependent compiler flags
into my CMake projects. For linker stage properties
LINKER_FLAGS_CONFIG exist, unfortunately COMPILE_FLAGS_CONFIG do
not. I want to change that myself and would be
Am 06.09.2012 15:33, schrieb Brad King:
On 09/06/2012 09:11 AM, Michael Stürmer wrote:
Ok, it was easier than I feared. COMPILE_FLAGS_CONFIG works now for me
with VS 2010 (and makefiles as well I hope, did not test that one so
far). I'm not yet sure if I enhance it toLANG_FLAGS_CONFIG but
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13521
==
Reported By:Timotei
Assigned To:
I still get bit by issues with QtDBus when building VTK with Qt
support on my Mac... It gets found as a .framework, but there's not
actually a library inside the framework folder, so link errors occur.
It would be fine if it simply didn't get found.
I waste some time every few months when I
Hi,
is there a recommended way to collect the preprocessor definitions for a target
?
From looking around it seems I have to manually collect COMPILE_DEFINITIONS
from the makefile, the target and the source file, and then again for each of
those additionally the per-configuration settings.
Is
On Thursday, September 06, 2012 03:17:33 PM David Cole wrote:
I still get bit by issues with QtDBus when building VTK with Qt
support on my Mac... It gets found as a .framework, but there's not
actually a library inside the framework folder, so link errors occur.
It would be fine if it simply
I am using a Qt 4.8.0 build, and I am seeing this problem in the Qt
install tree.
What's recent in your book? (If I upgrade to 4.8.2 will the problem
also just go away...?)
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.com wrote:
On Thursday, September 06, 2012 03:17:33 PM
I remember it being a problem in 4.6.0, 4.6.1 and then it was fixed in 4.6.2.
I meant recent by looking at my 4.8.2 build I made a few weeks back and seeing
that it doesn't have the empty framework. However, it is there in the build
tree. So maybe they regressed again in 4.8.0 and fixed it.
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13523
==
Reported By:quaker
Assigned To:
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via e301b6b906522f20ad317f10b4935ce4653103b0 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 96a741f990bac5212041d2312bce82207be5ae0d (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 9ec51496f5127dedb5f73d32e9b6370eb221f9d4 (commit)
via
Stamp
diff --git a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake
index 86f8282..40969ca 100644
--- a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake
+++ b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
set(CMake_VERSION_MAJOR 2)
set(CMake_VERSION_MINOR 8)
set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 9)
-set(CMake_VERSION_TWEAK 20120906
37 matches
Mail list logo