Brad King wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Stephen Kelly
steve...@gmail.com wrote:
This seems to have caused todays failures:
http://open.cdash.org/buildSummary.php?buildid=2337242
* Does the test pass if you replace
if(NOT CMAKE_C_COMPILER_VERSION VERSION_LESS 3.4)
with
if(NOT
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13281
==
Reported By:renzodenardi
Assigned To:
On 06/08/2012 04:50 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I still have an error with Watcom that I don't know how to fix, which I
think is the last error on this topic:
http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=148809149build=2343558
My guess was that the CMAKE_CXX_COMPILE_OPTIONS_DLL flag is not
Brad King wrote:
On 06/08/2012 04:50 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I still have an error with Watcom that I don't know how to fix, which I
think is the last error on this topic:
http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=148809149build=2343558
My guess was that the
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
Brad King wrote:
On 06/08/2012 04:50 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I still have an error with Watcom that I don't know how to fix, which I
think is the last error on this topic:
David Cole wrote:
There's also this build warning:
http://open.cdash.org/viewBuildError.php?type=1buildid=2342611
Please eradicate that, and then this topic will be ready for merging.
Any idea what causes it?
I don't see why only that line would cause such a warning. It should be
On 06/08/2012 10:08 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
David Cole wrote:
There's also this build warning:
http://open.cdash.org/viewBuildError.php?type=1buildid=2342611
Please eradicate that, and then this topic will be ready for merging.
Any idea what causes it?
I don't see why only that
Brad King wrote:
On 06/08/2012 10:08 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
David Cole wrote:
There's also this build warning:
http://open.cdash.org/viewBuildError.php?type=1buildid=2342611
Please eradicate that, and then this topic will be ready for merging.
Any idea what causes it?
I don't
There are two reasons this is an issue (for me)
1) using devenv to build is MUCH slower on many of the projects than
just using MSBuild. ... yes I know, longer build times mean more time
at the water cooler or whatever...
2) Using devenv, each project that gets built becomes a
The only thing to do is to figure out the prefix of /showIncludes, it's
hard coded atm:
https://github.com/syntheticpp/ninja/blob/cldeps/misc/cldeps.cc#L150
and to pass it to cldeps.
Interesting problem... Maybe just look for the second : or something
like that.
I compile a test file and
I mean using cmake --build . and/or getting BUILD_COMMAND from cmake
which comes back as devenv which is then used to build projects.
I had a bunch of cmake projects that built from a batch file, then I
made a cmakelists that does the same thing, so I have one
cmakelists.txt which builds all
J Decker d3c...@gmail.com writes:
I mean using cmake --build . and/or getting BUILD_COMMAND from cmake
which comes back as devenv which is then used to build projects.
I had a bunch of cmake projects that built from a batch file, then I
made a cmakelists that does the same thing, so I have
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Óscar Fuentes o...@wanadoo.es wrote:
J Decker d3c...@gmail.com writes:
I mean using cmake --build . and/or getting BUILD_COMMAND from cmake
which comes back as devenv which is then used to build projects.
I had a bunch of cmake projects that built from a batch
On 08.06.2012 18:10, Peter Kümmel wrote:
The only thing to do is to figure out the prefix of /showIncludes, it's
hard coded atm:
https://github.com/syntheticpp/ninja/blob/cldeps/misc/cldeps.cc#L150
and to pass it to cldeps.
Interesting problem... Maybe just look for the second : or
I woudl rather have it discover it for the appropriate version of
visual studio I select as a generator, I have already copied the
findprogram code from the script and put it at the head of a couple of
the scripts, but this doesn't fix that the outer layer is still being
built with devenv. I
On 06/08/2012 11:16 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
David Cole wrote:
Please eradicate that, and then this topic will be ready for merging.
It looks like the unit test is not being executed on the FarAway linux
continuous build.
That started yesterday, and as it is continuous (unclean?), I
Brad King wrote:
On 06/08/2012 11:16 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
David Cole wrote:
Please eradicate that, and then this topic will be ready for merging.
It looks like the unit test is not being executed on the FarAway linux
continuous build.
That started yesterday, and as it is
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 06/08/2012 11:16 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
David Cole wrote:
Please eradicate that, and then this topic will be ready for merging.
It looks like the unit test is not being executed on the FarAway linux
On 6/8/2012 12:38 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
I've pushed it to next to see if the BuildDepends test also passes on
the build server.
If someone giv it a try, I've uploaded binaries here
https://sourceforge.net/projects/cmakescript/files/
You need cmake and ninja (ninja/master, copy it into
On 08.06.2012 19:40, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 6/8/2012 12:38 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
I've pushed it to next to see if the BuildDepends test also passes on
the build server.
If someone giv it a try, I've uploaded binaries here
https://sourceforge.net/projects/cmakescript/files/
You need
Hi Peter,can you please explain what is the state of your ninja fork.Is is sync with origin ninja?Will it merged later?Can you please apply my time-stamp patch?P.S.I tried to compile it with your CMakeLists.txt file, but it needs love on linux (UNIX) build hosts. //RegardsClaus
On 08.06.2012 21:11, Claus Klein wrote:
Hi Peter,
can you please explain what is the state of your ninja fork.
It only adds cldeps and the CMakeLists.txt, nothing else.
Is is sync with origin ninja?
Yes, I branched yesterday.
Will it merged later?
Can you please apply my time-stamp
It is not getting that far. It is not even running cmcldeps. :)
The command= line is bad, so nothing builds, and we get no .d files.
I added parentheses around cmcldeps, it should work now.
I also found that CMAKE_CL_SHOWINCLUDE_PREFIX is not set for different
CMakeLists.txt. I assume
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13286
==
Reported By:Alex Merry
Assigned To:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13287
==
Reported By:Chris Stankevitz
Assigned To:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13288
==
Reported By:zub
Assigned To:
Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net writes:
It is not getting that far. It is not even running cmcldeps. :)
The command= line is bad, so nothing builds, and we get no .d files.
I added parentheses around cmcldeps, it should work now.
With your binaries from 2 hours ago, changes on header
On 6/8/2012 5:15 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
It is not getting that far. It is not even running cmcldeps. :)
The command= line is bad, so nothing builds, and we get no .d files.
I added parentheses around cmcldeps, it should work now.
I also found that CMAKE_CL_SHOWINCLUDE_PREFIX is not set
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Robert Dailey rcdailey.li...@gmail.comwrote:
I think I might know what it is...
I do the following:
include_directories( Z )
add_library( A )
include_directories( A ) # Include A's include directory
add_library(B) # B depends on A, and thus includes
Hi!
Is it possible to write a cmake target to generate a preprocessed C++
file? I know that cmake creates Makefiles which contain the appropriate make
targets as discussed here:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2009-March/028006.html
On 06/07/2012 04:22 PM, Andreas Schuh wrote:
I see. I am using Safari 5.1.7 on Mac OS X 10.6.8.
We changed the redirection from server-side to JavaScript.
Now it appears to work in all browsers. If JavaScript is
disabled the page falls back to a static link, but of course
that won't have the
Hi CMake,
can I skip a test with CTest? Currently I do not add a test which is
dependent on a not found feature, like:
if(feature_found)
add_test(..)
endif(feature_found)
If all tests pass, I still don't know whether everything is fine,
because the not added tests are not shown.
Has
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Christoph Grüninger
christoph.gruenin...@iws.uni-stuttgart.de wrote:
Hi CMake,
can I skip a test with CTest? Currently I do not add a test which is
dependent on a not found feature, like:
if(feature_found)
add_test(..)
endif(feature_found)
If all tests
2012/6/8 Christoph Grüninger christoph.gruenin...@iws.uni-stuttgart.de:
Hi CMake,
can I skip a test with CTest? Currently I do not add a test which is
dependent on a not found feature, like:
if(feature_found)
add_test(..)
endif(feature_found)
If all tests pass, I still don't know whether
Hi David,
thanks for your answer and the bug tracker link. I don't have any new
arguments besides that the arguments and use cases stated in the bug
tracker apply to our use case, too.
I see it like a poor man's code coverage. Once I forgot to enable MPI
support in autotools and it reported
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
What version of Visual studio? And, do you have a small reproducible test
case for this?
Oops - missed replying to the list. Visual Studio 2010. I can try to
create a small test case, but in the mean time we can
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Christoph Grüninger
christoph.gruenin...@iws.uni-stuttgart.de wrote:
Hi David,
thanks for your answer and the bug tracker link. I don't have any new
arguments besides that the arguments and use cases stated in the bug
tracker apply to our use case, too.
I
Your timing is impeccable.
We restarted apache a couple times in the last hour, but it was only down
for a couple seconds each time.
:-)
Let us know if you're still having an issue.
David
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Bill Lorensen bill.loren...@gmail.comwrote:
The dashboard host
OK now
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:49 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Your timing is impeccable.
We restarted apache a couple times in the last hour, but it was only down
for a couple seconds each time.
:-)
Let us know if you're still having an issue.
David
On Fri, Jun 8,
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 8b651a5747bd02005cad2e1f8b2630b0bf4d1aa8 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 30bf2c896e979ca24bcd913893394e46288df785 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 9e0172b255ba5fe3d1d39248da428f70ee4b2cd5 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 51b1df74b6051d347e96bc462f787cd6855365d1 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via d8eed5c615ece7f1fb46f14e404501833239cdee (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 5c59e6e8d5babbc9b0941d4dec0a9ebc2a2f9b8d (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via eb12de5d79d5a1dce918d736f935359babfc18e1 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 18ec852f3529d270568135eb788d70f91c562748 (commit)
via
Stamp
diff --git a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake
index 1bfc561..f1f5564 100644
--- a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake
+++ b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
SET(CMake_VERSION_MAJOR 2)
SET(CMake_VERSION_MINOR 8)
SET(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 8)
-SET(CMake_VERSION_TWEAK 20120608
48 matches
Mail list logo
