The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13591
==
Reported By:Eric NOULARD
Assigned To:
Stephen Kelly wrote:
Stephen Kelly wrote:
Stephen Kelly wrote:
None of the outputs have a backtrace. Any idea why? Can a backtrace be
provided? Reading the code, I'm not seeing which iteration is going past
the end.
I added some asserts and found that the problem is in iterating over
I had to do this to get the bootstrap version of CMake to work (and
the BootstrapTest to pass):
$ git diff
diff --git a/Source/CMakeLists.txt b/Source/CMakeLists.txt
index 9d46355..8bf6c40 100644
--- a/Source/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/Source/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -264,8 +264,6 @@ set(SRCS
cmTarget.cxx
On 10/16/2012 08:43 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Still, some of the platforms fail the test, and don't give any information
about why:
http://open.cdash.org/testSummary.php?project=1name=GeneratorExpressiondate=2012-10-16
Can someone please provide more information (backtrace or further
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13592
==
Reported By:Frank Miller
Assigned To:
I certainly wouldn't mind though I'm not sure what that means.
Do the changes in next still potentially make it into 2.8.10?
Brad mentioned this would be on the TODO list for after 2.8.10.
I've tried to run all tests successfully before submitting but I can't
tell if any of those were called
Hi,
I tried submitting my first patch recently (Issue 0013587) and I have a few
follow-up questions regarding best practices:
1) Looking at the dashboard, I apparently forgot to quote a path somewhere
in the test and it failed on spaces. What is the preferred way for me to
provide a fix for the
On 10/16/2012 10:36 AM, Petr Kmoch wrote:
1) Looking at the dashboard, I apparently forgot to quote a path somewhere in
the test and it failed on spaces. What is the preferred way for me to provide
a fix for the tests? A new commit normally continuing history of the patch as
I submitted it?
On 10/16/2012 11:04 AM, Brad King wrote:
I tested it locally on VS 6, 7.1, 8, 9, 10, and 11 all with
spaces in the path. I need to investigate the failures on
the dashboard to identify the problem.
Since we're trying to keep the dashboard as clean as possible
right now (to more directly test
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Nils Gladitz glad...@sci-vis.de wrote:
I certainly wouldn't mind though I'm not sure what that means.
Do the changes in next still potentially make it into 2.8.10?
Going into 'next' is how stuff gets tested on the dashboards, and then
later Brad and I merge
Ah that might explain it ... I may have been using nmake on Windows and
ninja on linux.
Thanks!
Nils
On 10/16/2012 05:27 PM, David Cole wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Nils Gladitz glad...@sci-vis.de wrote:
I certainly wouldn't mind though I'm not sure what that means.
Do the
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13593
==
Reported By:Vadim Zhukov
Assigned To:
Hello,
Am Dienstag, 16. Oktober 2012 um 16:36:49 schrieb Petr Kmoch:
2) Is there a code style document I could read somewhere? I now
understand line width is preferred at 79 columns max. and I believe I've
figured out brace indenting; anything else I should follow?
for writing CMake code I
On 10/16/2012 03:09 PM, Nils Gladitz wrote:
Well what would be awesome is having the launcher extract individual
diagnostic messages.
Limitations of that kind of log scraping was precisely the reason we
created CTEST_USE_LAUNCHERS in the first place. At most CTest should
add markup CDash can
Well, the mixing of lines of output from parallel compiles was the
main reason log scraping didn't work well.
At least with the launchers, we'd be able to scrape from a single
output stream associated with a single build step and we wouldn't have
the mixing of lines problem anymore.
Nils has a
The following bugs are on the roadmap (still in the 2.8.10 section),
even though they are unassigned:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=8170
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=9905
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11536
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11785
Thanks, Eike.
Note that I am not asking *who* should be looking at these bugs. I am
asking if anyone is *actually* looking at them at all
If you are not looking at them, no need for a response. If you are
looking at them, please assign them to yourself.
If nobody replies or claims these
On 2012-10-15 21:46-0700 Daniel Russel wrote:
On Oct 15, 2012, at 9:35 PM, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca wrote:
On 2012-10-15 21:02-0700 Daniel Russel wrote:
I'm trying to get cross compilation of a simple library working to
build a windows library on a linux box using the
Hi!
When using 'cmake .. -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=../cmake/m3.cmake' with
the makefile generator this works prefectly but when using it with
'cmake -GNinja .. -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=../cmake/m3.cmake' it fails
with the following message:
cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=../cmake/m3.cmake
On 10/15/2012 08:20 PM, Totte Karlsson wrote:
set( resultFileFolder ${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/wiki/reports) set(
resultFile ${resFileFolder}/tests_auto.xml)
First things first: You should *never* pollute your source tree, always
output to the build tree.
This is part of a google code project
On 10/16/2012 02:06 AM, digitalriptide wrote:
I need to create a Mach-o bundle format file. With g++, for example, I
can do the following
g++ -o helloWorld.bundle -bundle helloWorld.o
given some object file.
Is there some way to do this from cmake? I've looked at the
documentation for
Hi all, I haven't found the answer to this: I have a static library A that uses
static library B, but when I create an executable C I only want to link with A.
In Visual Studio this is accomplished by adding library B to Additional
Dependencies (Librarian/General), but how can I make CMake
Am 16.10.2012 12:43, schrieb Robert Bielik:
Hi all, I haven't found the answer to this: I have a static library A
that uses static library B, but when I create an executable C I only
want to link with A.
AFAIK you have to link C also with B.
You might add a target_link_libraries(C B) in C's
In my edit/compile/install/test process (where test is out of the CMake
scope), I would like to be able to do a:
make mylib make install
without building all the test suite. BUT (there's a but), make all still
have to build the test suite.
Is there a way to do that? My understanding is that
What does your CMakeLists look like?
Only the necessary rebuild steps should be taken on an incremental build.
How do you invoke a rebuild? (Just typing 'make' or some other mechanism?)
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Arindam Mukherjee
arindam.muker...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a
Titus von Boxberg skrev 2012-10-16 13:20:
Actually, target_link_libraries(C B) puts B into the
Additional Dependencies of the VC project generated for C.
Unfortunately that doesn't cut it. target_link_libraries adds the build dependency, but
it does not list the lib files in Additional
Am 16.10.2012 17:53, schrieb Robert Bielik:
Titus von Boxberg skrev 2012-10-16 13:20:
Actually, target_link_libraries(C B) puts B into the
Additional Dependencies of the VC project generated for C.
Unfortunately that doesn't cut it. target_link_libraries adds the build
dependency, but it does
The following example demonstrates a way for you to achieve what you need:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8)
project(t1)
include(CTest)
add_test(NAME test01 COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} -E environment)
set_property(TEST test01 APPEND PROPERTY ENVIRONMENT Z1ENV=1;2;3 Z2ENV=a;b;c)
If you want real vcxproj references, then use add_subdirectory
instead of ExternalProject to build things directly.
Or is there some reason you can't do that?
If we made real vcxproj files directly, then we'd have to run
configure on all the sub-projects at the outer project configure time.
Titus von Boxberg skrev 2012-10-16 19:11:
That wasn't clear from your first post.
Yes, your're right, sorry 'bout that.
I doubt that this is the intended behaviour of target_link_libraries.
Nominally target_link_libraries isn't used at all for static libs, but if it
should be, I'd expect
Hello,
I am currently having trouble with set_target_properties(...). I am trying to
call it twice to set two different values for the same property. The first call
I make looks like this:
set_target_properties(${PROJECT_NAME} PROPERTIES LINK_FLAGS
/ENTRY:mainCRTStartup)
Then, I call it
I think this is intended. The semantics are the same as the set function. You
can use set_property with the APPEND or APPEND_STRING option to do what you
want.
Frank
From: cmake-boun...@cmake.org [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of
Eric Clark
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:53 PM
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Eric Clark ecl...@ara.com wrote:
Hello,
I am currently having trouble with set_target_properties(…). I am trying to
call it twice to set two different values for the same property. The first
call I make looks like this:
Frank,
Thank you for such a quick reply. However, this is not working either. It is
correctly adding the value to my list for that property, but now it is using it
as the whole value in Visual Studio. Here is what I have now for the first call:
set_target_properties(${PROJECT_NAME} PROPERTIES
Try APPEND_STRING with a leading space in the string...
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Eric Clark ecl...@ara.com wrote:
Frank,
Thank you for such a quick reply. However, this is not working either. It is
correctly adding the value to my list for that property, but now it is using
it as
David and Frank,
Thank you so much! That worked perfectly! I really really appreciate your help,
I have been pounding away at this for days now... I should have just asked you
guys in the first place.
Thanks,
Eric
-Original Message-
From: David Cole [mailto:david.c...@kitware.com]
On 2012-08-16 08:42-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
I am not in a position to do MinGW/MSYS experiments on the Wine
platform at the moment, but once that is possible (should be a couple
of weeks from now) I will attempt to confirm on that platform that the
bootstrap method of building CMake works for
Ralph Barth will be out of the office starting 17/10/2012 and will be
returning on 23/10/2012.
Ich werde Ihre Nachrichten nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
WLLM related questions pls. contact Sebastian Neusüß and Jens Keil.
Theo Price Feed from EDRE pls contact Jens Keil
)
+set(CMake_VERSION_TWEAK 20121016)
#set(CMake_VERSION_RC 1)
---
Summary of changes:
Source/CMakeVersion.cmake |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
hooks/post-receive
--
CMake
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 96d3377e3f15374adbe4141187cd8d037bb93683 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 07143613c21480b27691358128de269495a724da (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via ba089c0be44c52fad406578bd08879a2c2ef5f99 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via b6ffadb60ab574d68112d8944769871997762c2c (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via bbcbc26135ddaf38a8572f2dc7117011d86e1bf8 (commit)
via
44 matches
Mail list logo
