[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013651]: FindSDL.cmake is broken

The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13651 == Reported By:Gino van den Bergen Assigned To:

[cmake-developers] How to fix FindSquish.cmake wrt. backward compatibility ?

Hi, I finally want to commit my changes to FindSquish.cmake upstream. FindSquish.cmake as it comes with cmake does not work at all with squish version 4.x. The documentation of FindSquish.cmake says it is currently aimed at version 3. This is this bug:

Re: [cmake-developers] How to fix FindSquish.cmake wrt. backward compatibility ?

On Sunday 04 November 2012, Alexander Neundorf wrote: Hi, I finally want to commit my changes to FindSquish.cmake upstream. FindSquish.cmake as it comes with cmake does not work at all with squish version 4.x. The documentation of FindSquish.cmake says it is currently aimed at version 3.

Re: [cmake-developers] How to fix FindSquish.cmake wrt. backward compatibility ?

I would prefer squish3_add_test and squish4_add_test, as the version number goes with squish, not with the add_test... Keep the old macros and functions with the same name and same meaning please. We've had too many backwards incompatible complaints in 2.8.10 after only a few days out in the

Re: [CMake] How clean generated build system files

Thanks guys, so it is not supported currently in cmake for whatever reasons. That would require cmake to know about all source files which may or may not be the case depending on your cmake rules I am not quite familiar with how cmake works, but in premake, user who write new rules is responsible

Re: [CMake] How clean generated build system files

Thanks Cristea, but how about the project files or make files? Not sure, but I think they are regenerated. If this is all that you want it might be the best way. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

[CMake] find_package(xyz)

Is the intent of the find_package() macro to be used to locate prebuilt third party libraries that have Include and library files prebuilt? Or can it be used in a scenario where third party source is on the local file system but will be built During the overall build process for a project?

Re: [CMake] OSX deployment target confusion for 2.8.10

Seeing the same thing trying to update the MacPorts cmake port to 2.8.10. The problem is in commit e7e613e. Patching Darwin.cmake back to revision 43b74793 solves the problem. The breakage is here: http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=e7e613efbf1da45a2a9e51d11a4022589d79c642

Re: [CMake] How clean generated build system files

On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:45 AM, lzprgmr baiyanhu...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks guys, so it is not supported currently in cmake for whatever reasons. It's not supported as a direct feature, to the best of my knowledge. That said, it is technically possible to do - it just requires you to create

[CMake] [New Module] FindPHP

Hi everyone, First time posting here, so treading lightly.. ;) While working on a SWIG-based PHP binding for the Apache Qpid project, I had to create my own FindPHP module - one that finds a lot more information about the PHP development environment than the existing FindPHP4 module does, and is

Re: [CMake] How to pack a target/file into multiple packages in Linux?

That solves my problem, thank you! On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/11/2 Ralph Zhang ralph.j.zh...@gmail.com: Hi guys I'm working on a project which generates quite a few executables, libraries and configs, they need to be packed into

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, master, updated. v2.8.10-50-g7c72403

Stamp diff --git a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake index 563b9aa..2a59496 100644 --- a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake +++ b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ set(CMake_VERSION_MAJOR 2) set(CMake_VERSION_MINOR 8) set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 10) -set(CMake_VERSION_TWEAK 20121104