[CMake] set variable in if block

Hello, I am trying to set a variable in an IF block, but it doesn't appear in the resulting cache or makefile. This is on Linux. Note that when I run cmake, the ${OSNAME} variable is printed, but the ${FOOBAR} variable ends up blank. Thanks, Juan IF (${OSNAME} STREQUAL Linux64) MESSAGE

[CMake] Re: set variable in if block

My apologies, it turns out there was a syntax error, that was not fatal, and not mentioned in the debug output. Thanks, Juan Juan Sanchez wrote: Hello, I am trying to set a variable in an IF block, but it doesn't appear in the resulting cache or makefile. This is on Linux. Note

[CMake] object file target

. Every time I type make, the object file gets recreated. ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND( OUTPUT ${PSTUFF}.o DEPENDS ${PSTUFF}.cc COMMAND ${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER} ARGS ${MYFLAGS} ) Thanks, Juan -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395

Re: [CMake] object file target

in a better way, I'd appreciate that info too. Regards, Juan Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Monday 30 July 2007 16:24, Juan Sanchez wrote: Is there a command for creating a .o target on Linux? If I create my own custom command for creating an object, the .o file is being recompiled every time

Re: [CMake] object file target

Montag 30 Juli 2007 22:44 schrieb Juan Sanchez: It's pretty messy the Makefile I am trying to convert. It is trying to do something like this: g++ -shared obj1.o obj2.o obj3.o staticarchivex.a staticarchivey.a -o sharedlibrary.so The static archives are compiled with -fPIC so dynamic relocation

Re: [CMake] object file target

of the static library arguments. Thanks again, Juan Hendrik Sattler wrote: Am Montag 30 Juli 2007 23:39 schrieb Juan Sanchez: Did you try to make it straight-forward without any tweaking around?: add_library (staticarchivex STATIC ...) add_library (staticarchivey STATIC ...) add_library (sharedlibrary

Re: [CMake] object file target

Thanks everyone for their help. I'm evaluating cmake for my group and it appears that cmake meets many of the needs that we have. Regards, Juan Hendrik Sattler wrote: Am Dienstag 31 Juli 2007 00:16 schrieb Juan Sanchez: Thanks for the make VERBOSE=1. I was flying blind before that since

Re: [CMake] object file target

sets an environment variable to 1, and this is read by the cmake binaries. Cheers, Juan Brandon Van Every wrote: On 7/30/07, Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the make VERBOSE=1. I was flying blind before that since it wasn't on the man page. It wasn't on the man page of your

Re: [CMake] Eclipse CDT4 CMake Generator - Pre-Alpha version

___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395 ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

[CMake] get includes

Is it possible to get the include paths from ADD_DIRECTORIES into a custom command? I need to pass along the include path for a special swig invocation. Regards, Juan -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395 ___ CMake

[CMake] Passing -B on linux

When I create a new cmake area, the tests are failing since it cannot find the 64bit version of our tools on linux. Is there anyway to pass the -B option to C and C++ compiler during the compiler testing phase? Thanks, Juan -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395

Re: [CMake] Passing -B on linux

Is there any way to pass a flag to g++ being invoked by the testing utils? I'm at least able to put the c++ compiler specification in a cache file, but I need to know how to prevent the path to the linker utils to be at the whim of the developer's environment. Regards, Juan gga wrote: Juan Sanchez

Re: [CMake] get includes

It looks like it should work. Thanks, Juan Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Wednesday 01 August 2007 18:53, Juan Sanchez wrote: Is it possible to get the include paths from ADD_DIRECTORIES into a custom command? I need to pass along the include path for a special swig invocation. Does

Re: [CMake] Passing -B on linux

Hi Bill, I was able to add CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS to my initial cache file and it worked. Thanks for the clarification. Thanks, Juan Bill Hoffman wrote: Juan Sanchez wrote: Hello gga, Unfortunately, the ADD_DEFINITIONS aren't being used in the initial tests being done by cmake. What I've found

[CMake] big custom command dependency problem

I created a custom command to generate a cpp file. I then use this cpp file to create a library as a separate add_library command. Whenever I type make, this cpp file is regenerated, and the library is recreated. Compiling this file is super expensive. Nothing has changed between invocations

Re: [CMake] big custom command dependency problem

I found the problem. The output from the custom command has to explicitly specify the destination path of the output file. OUTPUT ${PROJECT_BINARY_DIR}/output.cc I was already specifying the full path for the input to the library. Regards, Juan Juan Sanchez wrote: I created a custom

Re: [CMake] Re: problems compilating 2.4.7 under 2.2

able to compile and link a simple 'hello world!' program? ld is the linker. On a redhat system it's in the binutils package. I have no idea where it would be on ubuntu. It is independent of the compiler. Regards, Juan -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395

Re: [CMake] Re: problems compilating 2.4.7 under 2.2

In addition, if it is crt1.o which is missing, it is in glibc-devel on a redhat 7.3 system. Regards, Juan Juan Sanchez wrote: Matthew Woehlke wrote: Alex Dantart wrote: Matthew Woehlke wrote: Alex Dantart wrote: . . . Anyway, this line seems to be the important clue: /usr/bin/ld: crt1

Re: [CMake] Re: problems compilating 2.4.7 under 2.2

problem, but with a simple solution. On debian: apt-get install libc6-dev On Fedora: $ locate crt1.o /usr/lib/crt1.o On Ubuntu: apt-get install libc6-dev { If not root, sudo apt-get install libc6-dev } Juan Sanchez wrote: In addition, if it is crt1.o which is missing, it is in glibc-devel

[CMake] dependency checking

the source files instead of me specifying them? Is there a better way of preventing rebuilds when I know that my changes don't invalidate the object files I already have compiled? Regards, Juan -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395

Re: [CMake] dependency checking

Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Thursday 09 August 2007 12:57, Juan Sanchez wrote: I've been trying to find a good explanation of how the /fast target works online? Is there a place where the exact behavior documented? Also my concern is that adding a source file to CMakeLists.txt file triggers

Re: [CMake] dependency checking

PROJECT(main) SET (SRCS a.cc b.cc c.cc d.cc e.cc f.cc g.cc) ADD_EXECUTABLE(a ${SRCS}) ADD_LIBRARY(b ${SRCS}) SET_SOURCE_FILES_PROPERTIES ( ${SRCS} COMPILE_FLAGS -Wall ) Bill Hoffman wrote: Juan Sanchez wrote: I just added a source file to the list of sources in my library and now

Re: [CMake] dependency checking

} COMPILE_FLAGS -Wall ) I didn't test, but here the PROPERTIES keyword is missing. Is it just a copy'n paste error or does it still happen if you insert it ? Alex -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395 ___ CMake

[CMake] making two targets with similar names

I am having the following issue. I want to create both a libFOO.a and a libFOO.so. Note that the libFOO.so is composed of more sources than the libFOO.a. I use OUTPUT_NAME in order so they have the same name. I can make the FOOSTATIC, libFOO.a, target, just fine. However, making the

Re: [CMake] making two targets with similar names

Hi Bill, Thanks, it works when I do this in SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES. Juan Juan Sanchez wrote: Hi Bill, What's the proper syntax? Setting the variable in CMakeLists.txt doesn't work. Neither does setting it in my initial Cache file (loaded with cmake -C). SET (CLEAN_DIRECT_OUTPUT 1 CACHE

Re: [CMake] making two targets with similar names

Hi Bill, What's the proper syntax? Setting the variable in CMakeLists.txt doesn't work. Neither does setting it in my initial Cache file (loaded with cmake -C). SET (CLEAN_DIRECT_OUTPUT 1 CACHE STRING 1) Thanks, Juan Bill Hoffman wrote: Juan Sanchez wrote: I am having the following issue

[CMake] --whole-archive

. Thanks, Juan -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395 ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] --whole-archive

After some extensive googling, I found the solution here. http://www.mail-archive.com/cmake@cmake.org/msg01890.html Juan Sanchez wrote: Hi, On linux, I need to generate an shared library from an archive. I need to have: -Wl,-whole-archive before and -Wl,-no-whole-archive

[CMake] faq update?

? This FAQ entry is scaring some of my colleagues: That means I have to build all my library objects twice, once for shared and once for static. I don't like that! and they are on the prowl for cmake dealbreakers. Thanks, Juan -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602

[CMake] how to track package dependencies

What would be the best way to tackle having dependencies with multiple packages? For example, if package A depends on both packages B and C: 1. To make sure the compiler is the same 2. Know what flags where used for the sources in the dependency 3. Know whether or not the static archive is

Re: [CMake] faq update?

think that it is a valid approach. I'd prefer not to engage in wiki wars where I replace the untrue statement, with a technically correct hack. Then someone goes and changes it back. Juan Brandon Van Every wrote: On 9/13/07, Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The FAQ doesn't mention the trick

Re: [CMake] faq update?

, but requires that Kitware freeze a public interface to the object file locations. I don't know if they're willing to do that. Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Juan

Re: [CMake] Creating a static lib from other static libs, HOW?

extracted. Even with Brandon's solution, I don't think ar let you add multiple .o files of the same name in the archive. The symbols of the first .o file will get replaced by the symbols of the second .o file to be added. Juan Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello

Re: [CMake] Creating a static lib from other static libs, HOW?

Hello Brandon, How do you create the final archive without the ar command? Juan Brandon Van Every wrote: On 9/18/07, Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even with Brandon's solution, I don't think ar let you add multiple .o files of the same name in the archive. I'm going to guess you

Re: [CMake] Creating a static lib from other static libs, HOW?

. Juan Sanchez wrote: Hello Brandon, How do you create the final archive without the ar command? Juan Brandon Van Every wrote: On 9/18/07, Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even with Brandon's solution, I don't think ar let you add multiple .o files of the same name in the archive

[CMake] override variable in macro

It appears that the set command cannot override a variable specified as a MACRO argument. For example: MACRO (ADD_GADB RCMD) does not accept changes to RCMD within the macro using the set command. Is there a way to override this? Thanks, Juan ___

Re: [CMake] override variable in macro

I would argue that the following snippet of code should either print CAT twice or die. Unfortunately it first prints DOG and then CAT. Thanks, Juan MACRO(FOO BAR) SET (BAR CAT) MESSAGE(${BAR}) ENDMACRO(FOO) FOO(DOG) MESSAGE(${BAR}) Bill Hoffman wrote: Juan Sanchez wrote: What I

Re: [CMake] override variable in macro

Ok, But cpp doesn't discriminate between ${BAR} and BAR. #include iostream using namespace std; #define foo(x) x = 3; cout x \n; int main() { int y = 1; foo(y); cout y endl; } Juan Bill Hoffman wrote: Juan Sanchez wrote: I would argue that the following snippet of code should

[CMake] target_link_libraries external library

Hello, How do you add an externally library for linking into a target? I am getting something like this from TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES? CMake Error: Attempt to add link library /bar/linux-x86/opt/foo.a to target waterlooApps which is not built by this project. Thanks, Juan

[CMake] ctest question

I want run a test program and pipe its results to a file. I then want to compare this file to the golden results using diff. Does anyone have a macro or cookbook example for doing this? Thank you, Juan ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org

Re: [CMake] ctest question

libraries. I always disable 80 bit extended precision on linux since the results are non-deterministic with respect to compiler settings. Regards, Juan Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2007-09-24 10:05-0500 Juan Sanchez wrote: Hello Alan, From your example, what in this statement that causes

Re: [CMake] Compiling fortran

. Alin -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395 ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] ctest question

Awesome. I love that guys work on bibtex and bibtools. Juan Mathieu MARACHE wrote: 2007/9/25, Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Alan, I also have floating point results I want to account for. I'm thinking about writing a diff script for numerical results which uses an absolute

Re: [CMake] Compiling fortran

, is ever activated. fixed_fmt^[cC*dD].*\n { return EOSTMT; } /* empty lines */ Do you have any info about how to make submissions and getting the latest CVS? Juan Bill Hoffman wrote: Juan Sanchez wrote: It turns out that any word of the word Use or use as a word anywhere in a comment causes

Re: [CMake] Compiling fortran

Anyone know what are the valid comment lines in all the Fortran variants? I know of lines beginning with c, C, or * in the first column. Juan Bill Hoffman wrote: Juan Sanchez wrote: Hi Bill, I wouldn't mind taking a stab at it. It would be easy enough to tell lex to drop any line starting

Re: [CMake] CTest and Makefiles

what is going on here or how to fix it? Thanks, Justin ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395

Re: [CMake] CTest and Makefiles

tests... Start processing tests Test project /home/juans/bar 1/ 1 Testing foo Passed Juan Sanchez wrote: Would you happen to have a file named test in your binary area? Make will see the file and think that the target test is up to date. A proper gnu makefile would

Re: [CMake] CTest and Makefiles

naturally). Marking the test target as phony in the Makefile resolved the issue. It sounds like this should be fixed in the Makefile generator. There are several other targets that should be marked as phony as well. Thanks, Justin On Wednesday 26 September 2007 09:43:42 Juan Sanchez

[CMake] include directories variable?

How do I get the INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES path? I need to feed into into the search path for the swig command line. Thanks, Juan ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

[CMake] removing invalid output

I am using ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND to produce an output. Unfortunately, if the commands in it fail, the OUTPUT. Hence the OUTPUT is up to date, even though it is invalid. Is there a way to tell ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND to remove its output when it fails? Thanks, Juan

Re: [CMake] problem creating a library on mac

the files created by cmake to be in this directory so I could clean up my directory more easily ) ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512

Re: [CMake] problem creating a library on mac

Marie-Christine Vallet wrote: Juan Sanchez wrote: Could this be an issue with linker order? Most linkers are one pass. The library containing the undefined references should be on the linker line before the library containing the symbols, or vice-versa (I keep forgetting). The symbols

Re: [CMake] Can Make help be set less verbose?

___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395 ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http

[CMake] SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES twice

I just discovered that the moment I add a second SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES statement for a specific target, cmake will implicitly fail, and not write out a Makefile. It even states that it is writing the build files, but it does not. This is cmake 2.4.7 on linux. Any advice? Juan

Re: [CMake] SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES twice

to the list? Or, if not, could you post your source as is? On 10/2/07, Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just discovered that the moment I add a second SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES statement for a specific target, cmake will implicitly fail, and not write out a Makefile. It even states

[CMake] ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND and working directory

` WORKING_DIRECTORY ${PROJECT_BINARY_DIR} COMMAND echo `pwd` WORKING_DIRECTORY ${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR} ) ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET( zed ALL DEPENDS bar) Will always print the source directory. Thanks, Juan -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395

[CMake] install before test

How can you ensure that an install has done before you attempt to run the tests? Thanks, Juan -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395 ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

[CMake] ctest command

the arguments given. Please let me know what I need to do to get this to run. Testing/Temporary/LastTest.log always appears to be empty and the -VV option does not work. This is cmake 2.4.7. Thanks, Juan -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395

Re: [CMake] Dealing with circular linker dependencies

and make my executable depend on that new library target. Thanks, Tal ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Juan

Re: [CMake] ctest command

-0500 Juan Sanchez wrote: Hi, I'm trying to run the following test: ADD_TEST(foo ${CMAKE_TEST_COMMAND} --build-run-dir ${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR} -VV --test-command ls -ltar /tmp) But it doesn't seem to be running correctly. It needs to be run from ${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}, and the test command

solved! Re: [CMake] ctest command

Juan Sanchez wrote: I am trying to follow an example that is in the cmake book. It is in section 8.5 Using CTest to Drive Complex Tests on page 109. While my example differs in that it doesn't use all the arguments being used in the book's example, it is very important that I understand how

unsolved! Re: solved! Re: [CMake] ctest command

, is there any way to tell ctest to run in a specific directory? Thanks, Juan Juan Sanchez wrote: To solve my issue, I only need to specify the following. Otherwise, no error is printed, the test will always past, and ctest --debug prints pages and pages of debug info. ENABLE_TESTING() ADD_TEST(foo

Re: [CMake] Version embedding - how to cause a command when make is run?

://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395 ___ CMake

Re: [CMake] Version embedding - how to cause a command when make is run?

]$ ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext

[CMake] for install before running tests

The test scripts for an existing project rely greatly on the installed directory structure. Is it possible to always force an install before the tests are run? Thanks, Juan -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395

[CMake] get the target name in add_custom_command

In this example, the target name foo has a different OUTPUT_NAME. How do I tell ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND to use the real name of the target when I try to use the copy command within? ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND(TARGET foo POST_BUILD COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} -E copy foo ${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/${INSTALL_DIR})

Re: [CMake] for install before running tests

in the correct place? Regards, Juan Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2007-10-09 10:12-0500 Juan Sanchez wrote: The test scripts for an existing project rely greatly on the installed directory structure. For your information, that's contrary to the fundamental idea behind ctest (and autotools

[CMake] cmake copy command problem

Since I must copy a target after it's built, I synthesize a compile time install command. Unfortunately, the copy command obliterates the destination directory with a copy of the file being created. This seems to be contrary to the cmake -E help documentation: copy file destination - copy file

Re: [CMake] cmake copy command problem

I apologize. Upon further testing, this doesn't appear to be an issue. Thanks, Juan Juan Sanchez wrote: Since I must copy a target after it's built, I synthesize a compile time install command. Unfortunately, the copy command obliterates the destination directory with a copy of the file

[CMake] purify targets

Hello, Is it possible to build both purify and non purify targets by changing CMAKE_CXX_LINK_EXECUTABLE? Unfortunately the following example purify's both binaries. ADD_EXECUTABLE(hello helloworld.cc) SET (CMAKE_CXX_LINK_EXECUTABLE purify -cache-dir=/tmp ${CMAKE_CXX_LINK_EXECUTABLE})

Re: [CMake] purify targets

To clarify my question, should I expect changing CMAKE_CXX_LINK_EXECUTABLE to apply to both targets in the example below? This is cmake 2.4.7. Regards, Juan Juan Sanchez wrote: Hello, Is it possible to build both purify and non purify targets by changing CMAKE_CXX_LINK_EXECUTABLE

[CMake] compare ctest to dejagnu?

Someone in my group is investigating dejagnu. I was wondering if anyone with experience in ctest and dejagnu has any thoughts on these two testing systems? Thanks, Juan ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org

Re: [CMake] Wrong number of ../ elements in target path? 2.4.6 vs. 2.4.7 bug?

earlier, for some reason this seems to just be a non-issue in 2.4.7. Thanks everyone for the help. - Christian ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext

Re: [CMake] wxCmakeSetup

Where is the source for wxCMakeSetup? What platforms do you need it to compile for? I could do linux and maybe cygwin. Juan Mike Jackson wrote: I am more intersted in a nice Qt CMakeSetup but with some more added features. wxWidgets and Fltk just do not look that good under OS X. I am

Re: [CMake] wxCmakeSetup

With wxWidgets 2.6.8, the 64 bit issues appear to be solved. Unfortunately, it no longer likes receiving (const char *)'s without converting them using some special functions. It would take a while to change the code according to the instructions in:

Re: [CMake] improve the CMake language?

Brandon Van Every wrote: On Nov 2, 2007 11:49 AM, Juan E. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Brandon Van Every wrote: To make real improvements in all of those areas, you'd need a lot of funding. What kind of mandate do you have? There's not much point in saying

Re: [CMake] lexical scoping

://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395 ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] lexical scoping

Oh, I guess you did. My apologies. I guess the best way to fix your issue would be to move to a lua frontend. Juan Brandon Van Every wrote: On Nov 2, 2007 4:22 PM, Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My suggestion as a temporary work around would be to apply a namespace prefix

Re: [CMake] compiler major, minor version

://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395 ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Linking problem

. Regards, Juan Juan Sanchez wrote: Two things with convenience libraries. Part of this may be in the FAQ: On linux, compile the code fPIC or fpic (slightly different meanings). So for library hello: SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES( hello PROPERTIES OUTPUT_NAME hello CLEAN_DIRECT_OUTPUT 1

Re: [CMake] Linking problem

. So far I have fixed the issue by linking one of the libs of libfoo.so (say libx.a) to libbar.so. But this smells of nasy workaround. Obviously I'm doing something wrong here, so could anyone please help? Thanks! -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395

Re: [CMake] Linking problem

COMPILE_FLAGS -fPIC ) SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES( zzDYNAMIC PROPERTIES OUTPUT_NAME zz CLEAN_DIRECT_OUTPUT 1 ) ENDIF(CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME STREQUAL Linux AND CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GNUCC) Regards, Juan Juan Sanchez wrote: Hello, There a much nicer platform independent writeup

Re: [CMake] improve the CMake language?

I was reading exactly the link you sent, and the same one you accused Brandon of not reading. If there were supplemental materials, you should have sent them. I am not a lawyer. To be honest, the only compelling languages I've seen so far in this discussion is lua and tcl. This is because they

Re: [CMake] Automatic dependency scanner of CMake 2.4.7

? #if 0 #include foo.h #endif HS ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395 ___ CMake

Re: [CMake] Link question

. If that doesn't work, try SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES with the LINK_FLAGS you want. Juan Alex ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395

Re: [CMake] CMake Book ?

they are preparing a new edition of the book. -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450 Ext. 54395 512-602-4395 ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Applying command to source files

If I remember the original intent, I thought the desire was to enforce some draconian indenting policy. Shouldn't that be a script in your source code management tool? For example, the indentation policy will be enforced the moment the file is checked in. Juan Eric Noulard wrote: 2007/11/15,

Re: [CMake] Applying command to source files

Eric Noulard wrote: 2007/11/16, Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If I remember the original intent, I thought the desire was to enforce some draconian indenting policy. Draconian :=) Not really I'll consider this homogeneous in order to avoid stupid editor configuration config spurious

Re: [CMake] Applying command to source files

James Bigler wrote: Eric Noulard wrote: 2007/11/16, Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Shouldn't that be a script in your source code management tool? For example, the indentation policy will be enforced the moment the file is checked in. Yes your are damn right, and I did this in the past

Re: [CMake] CMake with Lua Experiment

? cm_add_library{simpleLib STATIC simpleLib.cxx simpleCLib.c simpleWe.cpp} Regards, Juan Cheers, Brandon Van Every ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake -- Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-538-8450

Re: [CMake] CMake with Lua Experiment

Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Tuesday 27 November 2007, Juan Sanchez wrote: ... How about? cm_add_library{simpleLib STATIC simpleLib.cxx simpleCLib.c simpleWe.cpp} Are you sure putting it all in one quoted string will make getting the quoting right simpler than it is now ? Please

Re: [CMake] CMake with Lua Experiment

Brandon Van Every wrote: On Nov 27, 2007 3:22 PM, Juan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about? cm_add_library{simpleLib STATIC simpleLib.cxx simpleCLib.c simpleWe.cpp} That paradigm is crippled with respect to FOREACH and LIST style processing. I can't really see everyone on the CMake

[CMake] Setting the compiler

I'm evaluating CMAKE for use by our group and I am running into an issue with selecting the compiler. Is there any way to set the compiler and flags in the CMakeLists.txt file? This information appears to be ignored. The FAQ as well as the book suggest setting environment variables. We have a

Re: [CMake] Setting the compiler

Bill Hoffman wrote: Juan Sanchez wrote: I'm evaluating CMAKE for use by our group and I am running into an issue with selecting the compiler. Is there any way to set the compiler and flags in the CMakeLists.txt file? This information appears to be ignored. The FAQ as well as the book

Re: [CMake] Setting the compiler

macros tests honored when determining the dependencies? Are the macro defines used in the compilation also passed along to the dependency checker for each build variant? Thanks, Juan Bill Hoffman wrote: Juan Sanchez wrote: Hi Bill, We are going to require the developer to run a specific

Re: [CMake] Setting the compiler

? Then it would be possible for developer's existing Makefiles to not get clobbered by cmake. Gnu make could then be called with the -f specification for the Makefile name. Thanks, Juan Bill Hoffman wrote: Juan Sanchez wrote: So, what is the current build system and how does it work? Everyone

Re: [CMake] [EXTERNAL] Re: Linking to boost on OS X 10.12

suggestion. > > > > -- > > J. Adam Stephens, Ph.D. > > Dakota Support Analyst > > https://dakota.sandia.gov/ > > Optimization and UQ > > Sandia National Laboratories > > Albuquerque, NM > > > > > > *From: *Juan Sanchez > *Date: *Tue

Re: [CMake] [EXTERNAL] Re: Linking to boost on OS X 10.12

Hello, Are you able to use BUILD_WITH_INSTALL_RPATH: https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.13/prop_tgt/BUILD_WITH_INSTALL_RPATH.html https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.13/prop_tgt/INSTALL_RPATH.html#prop_tgt:INSTALL_RPATH Regards, Juan On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 4:00 PM Stephens, J. Adam via CMake wrote:

Re: [CMake] Question about getting git branch name.

Hello, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1417957/show-just-the-current-branch-in-git suggests: git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD Regards, Juan On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 5:25 PM Steven Truppe wrote: > Hi everyone, > > i want to have code lines like: > > #define BUILD_VERSION > > and the

Re: [CMake] How to use Ninja on Windows with MSVC?

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:27 AM Michael Jackson < mike.jack...@bluequartz.net> wrote: > Do this all the time both for our CDash nightlies and when I am developing > on Windows. The essential pieces of the puzzle are the following: > > 1: Ninja needs to be on your path > 2: The compilers need to

  1   2   >