On 11/14/2011 09:15 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Michael Hertling mhertl...@online.dewrote:
On 11/14/2011 06:17 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
Well maybe you can tell me I'm doing this wrong then, but based on how I
am
currently setting up my third party libraries, it
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Michael Hertling mhertl...@online.dewrote:
As David has outlined in the meantime, the advice is not about using
FIND_LIBRARY() - which has not been mentioned a single time - but to
assemble full paths from the libraries' directories and the libraries
Hi,
For a static library target, I used TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES and LINK_DIRECTORIES
to link with a third party library. As we can see that in cmake, this linking
information is propagated and used only in an executable/shared library target
which depends on the former static library. But the
On 11/14/2011 11:46 AM, Arunmozhi wrote:
Hi,
For a static library target, I used TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES and
LINK_DIRECTORIES to link with a third party library. As we can see that
in cmake, this linking information is propagated and used only in an
executable/shared library target which
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Arun
Consider LINK_DIRECTORIES to be obsolete and to be avoided at all cost.
I don't really agree with this advice. There are circumstances where
link_directories() is absolutely necessary, so advocating to completely
On 11/14/2011 03:36 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com
mailto:them...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Arun
Consider LINK_DIRECTORIES to be obsolete and to be avoided at all cost.
I don't really agree with this advice. There are
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Arun
Consider LINK_DIRECTORIES to be obsolete and to be avoided at all cost.
I don't really agree with this advice. There are circumstances where
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:00 AM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Arun
Consider LINK_DIRECTORIES to be obsolete and to be avoided at
On 14 November 2011 17:17, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
So basically all third party libraries we use are not installed
individually, instead we have a server on our intranet that contains
precompiled versions of all libraries in a specific and consistent
hierarchy. For this reason,
On 11/14/2011 06:17 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:00 AM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Arun
Consider
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Michael Hertling mhertl...@online.dewrote:
On 11/14/2011 06:17 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
Well maybe you can tell me I'm doing this wrong then, but based on how I
am
currently setting up my third party libraries, it is required.
So basically all third
On Monday 14 November 2011, Robert Dailey wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Michael Hertling
mhertl...@online.dewrote:
On 11/14/2011 06:17 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
Well maybe you can tell me I'm doing this wrong then, but based on how
I
am
currently setting up my third
If you already know where all the libraries are, please just use the
full paths to those libraries, and do not use find_library.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Michael Hertling mhertl...@online.de
wrote:
On 11/14/2011
That's what I do sometimes. To make that easier, CMake gives some convenience
variables for library prefixes and suffixes if you are on multiple platforms.
Clint
On Monday, November 14, 2011 01:20:29 pm David Cole wrote:
If you already know where all the libraries are, please just use the
What is the difference between CMAKE_LINK_LIBRARY_SUFFIX and
CMAKE_IMPORT_LIBRARY_SUFFIX? Which should I use?
-
Robert Dailey
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.comwrote:
That's what I do sometimes. To make that easier, CMake gives some
convenience
From the Modules/Platform/* files, it looks like the only difference between
the
two is when using CYGWIN or MinGW. I'm not sure which to use.
Clint
On Monday, November 14, 2011 01:51:49 pm Robert Dailey wrote:
What is the difference between CMAKE_LINK_LIBRARY_SUFFIX and
16 matches
Mail list logo
