Re: [CMake] cpack ppc64le rhel7.2 CPACK_RPM_PACKAGE_ARCHITECTURE

I was able to verify, btw, that Fedora 19 + Power8 outputs ppc64le for uname -m so I assume it works correctly on EL7 as well. Testead via an IBM machine hosted at the OSU Open Source Lab that we can access and use for testing. - Chuck On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:33 AM, M Kelly

Re: [CMake] cpack ppc64le rhel7.2 CPACK_RPM_PACKAGE_ARCHITECTURE

Domen Vrankar writes: > > > The strange thing is that CMAKE_HOST_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR (outputed by cmake > > --system-information) uses the same "uname -m" > > see Modules/CMakeDetermineSystem.cmake. > > > > So there is something odd to have one right and the other wrong... > >

Re: [CMake] cpack ppc64le rhel7.2 CPACK_RPM_PACKAGE_ARCHITECTURE

> The strange thing is that CMAKE_HOST_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR (outputed by cmake > --system-information) uses the same "uname -m" > see Modules/CMakeDetermineSystem.cmake. > > So there is something odd to have one right and the other wrong... In that case it's quite possible that

Re: [CMake] cpack ppc64le rhel7.2 CPACK_RPM_PACKAGE_ARCHITECTURE

2016-06-08 9:45 GMT+02:00 Domen Vrankar : > > I am working on an IBM Power8 RHEL7.2 system and we installed cmake 3.6 > > (default cmake from repo was 2.8.12?) but it seems when making a package > > the arch is set incorrectly to x86_64 instead of ppc64le. > > I don't

Re: [CMake] cpack ppc64le rhel7.2 CPACK_RPM_PACKAGE_ARCHITECTURE

> I am working on an IBM Power8 RHEL7.2 system and we installed cmake 3.6 > (default cmake from repo was 2.8.12?) but it seems when making a package > the arch is set incorrectly to x86_64 instead of ppc64le. I don't have access to a ppc with Linux but it seems that 'uname -m' (default that is