On Thu, 15 May 2014, Jodi Schneider wrote:
elm++
people still use elm?
I'm personally using the 'patterns-filters2' rule in alpine for managing
my mailing lists.
I've considered switching to mutt, but I haven't used elm or its
derivatives in over a decade. (elm didn't have good MIME
elm++
elm didn't have good MIME support
I have to agree. I have scoured YouTube and found no videos of Eric
Lease Morgan silently trapped in a glass box... :-)
On May 8, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Jodi Schneider jschnei...@pobox.com wrote:
Eric -- are you still the list owner? j...@code4lib.org already uses Job: as
a prefix -- so I would suggest adding Job as a topic, setting
Default-Topics= Job,OTHER (unless all-caps is requisite?) If this works,
.
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Withdraw my post was: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
Obviously, we must now task someone in CODE4LIB with writing a Python script to
convert New Zealand English to International English.
Or, I guess we could solve this on the user side with a sarcasm
was: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for
jobs
I can't help with the Python, but a test case for the script would obviously be
You know I can't subscribe to your ghost jobs list.
Deborah
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Susan
Kane
Sent
On 8 May 2014 18:08, Scott Fisher scott.fis...@ucop.edu wrote:
4. I find arguments to the effect of I love looking at jobs² orthoginal
to the discussion since weıre not talking about disallowing job postings,
but just moving them to a separate list. Anyone who is interested enough
in jobs
I have filters set up, and find they just don't work reliably. OK, they
work 9 times out of 10, but things always slip through.
Imho, there are more people inconvenienced by having jobs on the list
(setting up filters, filters not working, unable to filter digests, etc.)
than there are
-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Stuart
Yeates
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 8:28 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Withdraw my post was: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
The fact that the only person who has given any
Obviously, we must now task someone in CODE4LIB with writing a Python
script to convert New Zealand English to International English.
Or, I guess we could solve this on the user side with a sarcasm filter or a
humor pipe, but you might lose some data that way.
:-)
-- Susan Kane
Boston(ish), MA
I suspect I'm not the only mostly-lurker who subscribes to CODE4LIB in digest
mode, finding value in a glance over the previous day's discussions each
morning, then (very) occasionally weighing in on individual threads via the web
interface. I find this to be more effective and efficient than
On May 8, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Ben Brumfield wrote:
I suspect I'm not the only mostly-lurker who subscribes to CODE4LIB in digest
mode, finding value in a glance over the previous day's discussions each
morning, then (very) occasionally weighing in on individual threads via the
web
Of everything I heard, Joe's suggestion sounds most palatable.
I hope jobs will *always* be on the list but I understand that some people
don't want to read them and feel it's a burden to filter (there are a lot
of crappy mail clients out there).
The documentation I looked at isn't detailed
I¹ll +1 the suggestion for a separate list for jobs. My personal reasons:
1. I receive the digest version of the code4lib emails (once daily), so I
can¹t easily split just jobs into their own folder in my mail program
since it¹s all one file. I don¹t really want to start parsing and
splitting
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Joe Hourcle
onei...@grace.nascom.nasa.govwrote:
On May 8, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Ben Brumfield wrote:As this is an an actual
LISTSERV(tm) mailing list, it's possible for the list owner to define
'topics', and then for people to set up their subscription to exclude
I have another, maybe minor, point to add to this: I've posted a job to
Code4Lib, and I did it wrong. I have no idea how I'm supposed to make a job
show up correctly, and now that I have realized I've done it wrong, I
probably won't send another job to this list. (Or maybe I'll look it up in
...
On May 8, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Coral Sheldon-Hess wrote:
I have another, maybe minor, point to add to this: I've posted a job to
Code4Lib, and I did it wrong. I have no idea how I'm supposed to make a job
show up correctly, and now that I have realized I've done it wrong, I
probably won't send
On 05/09/2014 02:44 AM, Susan Kane wrote:
Obviously, we must now task someone in CODE4LIB with writing a Python
script to convert New Zealand English to International English.
Yes, because tasking people with AI-complete programming tasks (see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI-complete ) is
Hi Coral all,
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Coral Sheldon-Hess
co...@sheldon-hess.orgwrote:
I have another, maybe minor, point to add to this: I've posted a job to
Code4Lib, and I did it wrong. I have no idea how I'm supposed to make a job
show up correctly, and now that I have realized
On 05/09/2014 10:04 AM, Jodi Schneider wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Coral Sheldon-Hess wrote:
I have another, maybe minor, point to add to this: I've posted a job to
Code4Lib, and I did it wrong. I have no idea how I'm supposed to make a job
show up correctly, and now that I have
pull request with something along those lines:
https://github.com/code4lib/shortimer/pull/31
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Stuart Yeates stuart.yea...@vuw.ac.nzwrote:
On 05/09/2014 10:04 AM, Jodi Schneider wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Coral Sheldon-Hess wrote:
I have another,
Salvete!
Honestly, though, who all would even want to understand a Kiwi? They're
practically escaped convicts, since everyone in the Northern Hemisphere knows
that they're just tiny Aussies.* Also, I have to translate code for them, since
they cannot do for themselves. [1]
Ba dum cha,
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 07:51:02 +1200
From: stuart.yea...@vuw.ac.nz
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
On 05/07/2014 04:59 AM, Richard Sarvas wrote:
Not to be a jerk about this, but why is the answer always No? There seem
to be more posts
:
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 07:51:02 +1200
From: stuart.yea...@vuw.ac.nz
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
On 05/07/2014 04:59 AM, Richard Sarvas wrote:
Not to be a jerk about this, but why is the answer always No? There
seem to be more posts
I'm a 'big picture' kind of guy and I personally think that knowing what's
going on in the world of libraries (including employment needs and
requirements) is an essential part of coding for libraries. I also echo the
sentiment that I don't need yet another list-serv subscription - I can
On 5/7/14, 5:37 AM, Sarah Shealy wrote:
you're creating an artificial divide between us and them. No one is
'intruding' on anyone - it's a public forum for people who work in LIBRARIES (aka - places where
inclusion is supposed to rule) without any filtering of participants, so technically
;)
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Sarah
Shealy
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 5:38 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 07:51:02 +1200
From: stuart.yea...@vuw.ac.nz
Subject: Re
This is a pretty terrible reply.
I thought it was a great reply.
obscure words (seriously, shibboleth?)
Somewhat obscure, but not so much in Code4Lib.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shibboleth
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shibboleth_(Internet2)
Unless you're trying to be sarcastic...in which
Is it time to reconsider: should we start a separate list for
discussing a separate list for Job: postings?
code4lib-discuss-jobs-list-jobs-list, perhaps?
:P /runs away
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:17 PM, David Friggens frigg...@waikato.ac.nz wrote:
This is a pretty terrible reply.
I thought it
I don't mind having them both in the same feed. They're easy enough to
tell apart even w/o a filter. The reason I say this is that when I see
something like Job: Digital Assets Librarian, or Job: Linked Data
Technologist, Metadata at Stanford University, just to pick two at
random, that's a good
The fact that the only person who has given any acknowledgement of
understanding my message was someone else in .ac.nz suggests that
despite my best efforts my message content was effectively shredded by
the implicit conversion from New Zealand English to International English.
My apologies;
[mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles
Blair
Sent: Thursday, 8 May 2014 11:56 a.m.
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
I don't mind having them both in the same feed. They're easy enough to tell
apart even w/o a filter. The reason I say
:)
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Charles Blair
Sent: Thursday, 8 May 2014 11:56 a.m.
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
I don't mind having them both in the same feed. They're
In the great growing tradition of 21st century political debate, I will avoid
the questions in this thread entirely, and pivot to points that I personally
find gratifying to discuss, as I'm enjoying the observations of others:
1.) For the record, though I've never been to New Zealand (still
No.
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Dan Chudnov daniel.chud...@gmail.comwrote:
Is it time to reconsider: should we start a separate list for Job:
postings? code4lib-jobs, perhaps?
-Dan
--
Sent from my GMail account.
No
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Devon dec...@gmail.com wrote:
No.
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Dan Chudnov daniel.chud...@gmail.comwrote:
Is it time to reconsider: should we start a separate list for Job:
postings? code4lib-jobs, perhaps?
-Dan
--
Sent from my GMail
This comes up all the time, and always it's no. For anyone who
doesn't like the job postings, use email filters.
-Wilhelmina
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Dan Chudnov daniel.chud...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it time to reconsider: should we start a separate list for Job:
postings?
: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
This comes up all the time, and always it's no. For anyone who doesn't like
the job postings, use email filters.
-Wilhelmina
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Dan Chudnov daniel.chud...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it time to reconsider: should we start a separate list
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Richard Sarvas richard.sar...@lib.uconn.edu
wrote:
Not to be a jerk about this, but why is the answer always No? There seem
to be more posts on this list relating to job openings than there are
relating to code discussions. Are job postings a part why this list
No.
Junior Tidal
Assistant Professor
Web Services and Multimedia Librarian
New York City College of Technology, CUNY
300 Jay Street, Rm A434
Brooklyn, NY 11201
718.260.5481
http://library.citytech.cuny.edu
Dan Chudnov daniel.chud...@gmail.com 5/6/2014 12:34 PM
Is it time to reconsider:
No
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Edward
M. Corrado
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 12:38 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
No
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Devon dec...@gmail.com
@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Dan
Chudnov
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 12:35 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
Is it time to reconsider: should we start a separate list for Job: postings?
code4lib-jobs, perhaps?
-Dan
*Shop to Support Queens Library! Buy books, e
No.
The sender is j...@code4lib.org, so that makes email filters super easy ;-).
- Original Message -
From: Dan Chudnov daniel.chud...@gmail.com
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 12:34:31 PM
Subject: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
Is it time to reconsider
the ones that are way
above my head, but at least I've some idea what terms to look up!
JJ
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Dan Chudnov
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 12:35 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] separate
There is another benefit in addition to, skills should I cultivate. There
is a follow-the-money factor. Declaring I'm for Linked Data is one thing.
Putting Linked Data in a job title is something far more significant.
Since code4lib is not always boast4lib-ish, it would be too great a loss to
not
: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
Is it time to reconsider: should we start a separate list for Job:
postings? code4lib-jobs, perhaps?
-Dan
*Shop to Support Queens Library! Buy books, e-books, videos,
music, gifts at great prices. A portion of the proceeds benefit
Queens Library
Very well then, carry on with the job postings.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Steve
Meyer
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 1:34 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
There is another
- Original Message -
From: Cynthia Ng cynthia.s...@gmail.com
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 10:33:09 AM
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
what jobs emails? I haven't seen one of those since I started on this list
=P
I agree that a simple filter works
smime.p7m
Description: S/MIME encrypted message
On 05/07/2014 04:59 AM, Richard Sarvas wrote:
Not to be a jerk about this, but why is the answer always No? There seem to
be more posts on this list relating to job openings than there are relating to code
discussions. Are job postings a part why this list was originally created? If so, I'll
...@gmail.com
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 10:33:09 AM
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
what jobs emails? I haven't seen one of those since I started on this list
=P
I agree that a simple filter works perfectly well, and the lower number of
mailing list
for taking the time to explain reason why so many job postings
appear on this list.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Stuart
Yeates
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 3:51 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate
Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Stuart Yeates
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 3:51 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
On 05/07/2014 04:59 AM, Richard Sarvas wrote:
Not to be a jerk about
.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Stuart Yeates
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 3:51 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
On 05/07/2014 04:59 AM, Richard Sarvas wrote
...@hagerstownlibrary.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 4:53 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
I rarely post anything to this list because honestly I'm not qualified in
most cases. For this, however, I'm qualified. While I didn't see the
initial question, I've figured
, 2014 4:53 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
I rarely post anything to this list because honestly I'm not qualified in
most cases. For this, however, I'm qualified. While I didn't see the
initial question, I've figured it through its replies.
Some
From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Ruth
Frasur [direc...@hagerstownlibrary.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 4:53 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
I rarely post anything to this list because honestly I'm
: Wednesday, 7 May 2014 9:10 a.m.
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for jobs
I vote no the separation, even though I am a high school student I still enjoy
reading the postings and seeing what jobs are out there, people with solid jobs
likely agree with me 100%, plus
57 matches
Mail list logo
