[CODE4LIB] friendly reminder - eco4r-workshop 11./12.Nov. Cologne: “Exposition and reuse of multipart publications from living repositories”

2010-10-29 Thread Anouar Boulal
*** Apologize for cross-posting *** Dear colleagues, we would like to draw your attention again to the eco4r workshop. The eco4r project (http://www.eco4r.org) aims to be a proof of existing concepts and standards (e.g. OAI-ORE, METS) for the exposure, exchangeability and reusability of

[CODE4LIB] vufind, ead files, harvesting content, and text mining

2010-10-29 Thread Eric Lease Morgan
I have written a couple of blog postings as well as bunches o' hacks surrounding VUFind, EAD files, harvesting content, and text mining that may be of interest to us coders: 1. EAD files - The first posting and set of Perl scripts describes how I am currently indexing MARC records, but more

Re: [CODE4LIB] PHP vs. Python [was: Re: Django]

2010-10-29 Thread William Sexton
I use Python and Django extensively, and think they're both great. That said, also great is the very funny keynote by former flickr engineer Cal Henderson at DjangoCon 2008, titled Why I Hate Django, which is on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6Fr65PFqfk When he showed the slide I had

Re: [CODE4LIB] PHP vs. Python [was: Re: Django]

2010-10-29 Thread Genny Engel
I think the significant attributes of most programming languages are adequately summarized here: http://james-iry.blogspot.com/2009/05/brief-incomplete-and-mostly-wrong.html From: Code for Libraries [code4...@listserv.nd.edu] on behalf of William Sexton

Re: [CODE4LIB] PHP vs. Python [was: Re: Django]

2010-10-29 Thread Mark Tomko
Have people found Django fairly usable without using its ORM features? I'm not a big ORM fan, and it seems that so many Python frameworks sort of fall over if you try to get around the ORM. It's a bit of a shame, because I like Python. I wish Bottle and Flask were a little easier to work

Re: [CODE4LIB] PHP vs. Python [was: Re: Django]

2010-10-29 Thread Bradley Allen
Mark- I would highly recommend looking at Tornado (http://www.tornadoweb.org) as an alternative to using Django without the ORM. It provides URL dispatch and templating capabilities without commitment to a particular storage model, and is fast in standalone use, without requiring extra scaffolding

Re: [CODE4LIB] PHP vs. Python [was: Re: Django]

2010-10-29 Thread Alexander Johannesen
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Bradley Allen bradley.p.al...@gmail.com wrote: Mark- I would highly recommend looking at Tornado (http://www.tornadoweb.org) as an alternative to using Django without the ORM. I'd second that one. Has used it for a couple of projects, and it seriously cut down

Re: [CODE4LIB] PHP vs. Python [was: Re: Django]

2010-10-29 Thread Mark Tomko
Thanks to you both - that looks promising! Mark On Oct 29, 2010, at 4:57 PM, Alexander Johannesen wrote: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Bradley Allen bradley.p.al...@gmail.com wrote: Mark- I would highly recommend looking at Tornado (http://www.tornadoweb.org) as an alternative to using

Re: [CODE4LIB] PHP vs. Python [was: Re: Django]

2010-10-29 Thread Peter Schlumpf
What's wrong with the library world developing its own domain language? From scratch. I mean not something like MARC that is just a static container for stuff, but a language that actually does something such as manipulating semantic maps or some such? It's not like things like PHP or Python

[CODE4LIB] Semanic Web Journal Issue on Semantic Web and Reasoning for Cultural Heritage and Digital Libraries

2010-10-29 Thread Holley Long
(Apologies for cross postings) * Call for Papers*

Re: [CODE4LIB] PHP vs. Python [was: Re: Django]

2010-10-29 Thread Bill Dueber
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Peter Schlumpf pschlu...@earthlink.netwrote: What's wrong with the library world developing its own domain language? EVERYTHING!!! We're already in a world of pain because we have our own data formats and ways of dealing with them, all of which have