Dear all,
We are currently advertising for a Digital Library Systems Developer at the
University of York to work on our latest JISC enhancement project 'YODL-ING'.
The post is fixed-term for 18 months.
Further details here:
https://www22.i-grasp.com/fe/tpl_YorkUni01.asp?newms=jj&id=24975
Cl
Andrew Nagy wrote:
Summon is really more than an NGC as we are selling it as a service - a
unified discovery service. This means that it is a single repository of the
library's content ( subscription content, catalog records, IR data, etc.).
Federated search is not apart of Summon
Well, if we
I, and most of the people I've worked with, have been using the terms
"metasearch", "federated search", "broadcast search" and "distributed
search" synonymously for years. Have they now settled down into
having distinct meanings? If anyone could summarise, I'd be grateful.
_/|__
Sorry, but, "me too!"
Rob
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Mike Taylor wrote:
I, and most of the people I've worked with, have been using the terms
"metasearch", "federated search", "broadcast search" and "distributed
search" synonymously for years. Have they now settled down into
having distinct meaning
On Apr 21, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Mike Taylor wrote:
I, and most of the people I've worked with, have been using the terms
"metasearch", "federated search", "broadcast search" and "distributed
search" synonymously for years. Have they now settled down into
having distinct meanings? If anyone could
me 3
Cathryn Bowie
Electronic Services Librarian
State of Oregon Law Library
503-986-5921
cathryn.e.bo...@ojd.state.or.us
"Dr R. Sanderson"
Sent by: Code for Libraries
04/21/2009 07:45 AM
Please respond to
Code for Libraries
To
CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [CODE4LIB] Serials S
Both the terms "federated searching" and "meta-searching" are often used
ambiguously to refer to both of these techniques.
I've been trying to use "broadcast search" and "local index" to be clear
about which technique I'm talking about. (I used to say 'cross-search'
for 'broadcast search', but
> But I don't think I was clear with my question in any case; it occurs to me
> now that my true question wasn't code-related, but seeing Summon on the conf
> agenda prompted me to bring it up here. Namely: has anyone investigated
> whether the arrangements SerSol has with content vendors are easi
Eric,
How is this 'new type' of index any different from an index of OAI-PMH
harvested material? Which in turn is no different from any other local
search, just a different method of ingesting the data?
Sounds like good PR to me, rather than a revolution ;)
Rob
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Eric Le
Eric Lease Morgan writes:
> On Apr 21, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Mike Taylor wrote:
>
> > I, and most of the people I've worked with, have been using the terms
> > "metasearch", "federated search", "broadcast search" and "distributed
> > search" synonymously for years. Have they now settled down in
Karen Schneider wrote:
But I don't think I was clear with my question in any case; it occurs to me
now that my true question wasn't code-related, but seeing Summon on the conf
agenda prompted me to bring it up here. Namely: has anyone investigated
whether the arrangements SerSol has with content
On Apr 21, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Dr R. Sanderson wrote:
How is this 'new type' of index any different from an index of OAI-PMH
harvested material? Which in turn is no different from any other
local
search, just a different method of ingesting the data?
This "new type" of index is not any di
Well, I'm pretty sure we haven't settled at all on the terminology, but
here's how I use the terms:
Federated Search - I use this to mean a search where the query is sent
against a number of disparate resources; it doesn't matter if they are
local or not.
I don't use broadcast or distributed sear
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
On Apr 21, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Dr R. Sanderson wrote:
How is this 'new type' of index any different from an index of OAI-PMH
harvested material? Which in turn is no different from any other
local search, just a different method of ingesting the data?
On 04/21/2009 10:40 AM, Mike Taylor wrote:
> I, and most of the people I've worked with, have been using the terms
> "metasearch", "federated search", "broadcast search" and "distributed
> search" synonymously for years. Have they now settled down into
> having distinct meanings? If anyone could
Dear all,
Apologies for cross-posting.
Dublin Core-2009 Conference invites proposals for the Tutorial to be held in
Seoul, Korea from 12 to 16 October 2009. We wish to include both
Introductory and Advanced tutorials in the program, and would welcome
proposals in both categories as described bel
From: "Thomas Dowling"
You can define differences between meta-, federated, and broadcast search,
but
every discussion on the topic will be punctuated by people asking, "Wait,
what's the difference again?"
Leaving aside metasearch and broadcast search (terms invented more recently)
it is a
Even though Summon is marketed as a Serial Solutions system, I tend to think of
it more as coming from Proquest (the parent company, of course).
Summon goes a bit beyond what Proquest and CSA have done in the past, loading
outside publisher data, your local catalog records, and some other nice d
I've noticed that reference and instructional librarians (at least in published
literature) tend to use the term "federated search" more often than others.
And by that they mean a broadcast search, not what Ray and many others mean by
that term.
Library technology folk tend to use the other
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress writes:
> From: "Thomas Dowling"
> > You can define differences between meta-, federated, and
> > broadcast search, but every discussion on the topic will be
> > punctuated by people asking, "Wait, what's the difference again?"
>
> Leaving aside metasearch
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kevin Reiss
Date: Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 2:16 PM
Subject: [code4libnycsig-l] Upcoming Meeting - April 22
To: code4libnycsig-l
Hi List Members,
The code4libnyc SIG will hold our next meeting on Wednesday, April
22nd between 10:00 a.m. and 12 noon at th
Dr R. Sanderson wrote:
Eric,
How is this 'new type' of index any different from an index of OAI-PMH
harvested material? Which in turn is no different from any other local
search, just a different method of ingesting the data?
Sounds like good PR to me, rather than a revolution ;)
I don't
Thomas Dowling wrote:
We've occasionally tried to disambiguate those terms for some purposes
around
here and realized that, if most people use them synonymously, they're synonyms.
You can define differences between meta-, federated, and broadcast search, but
every discussion on the topic will b
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
Leaving aside metasearch and broadcast search (terms invented more recently)
it is a shame if "federated" has really lost its distinction
from"distributed". Historically, a federated database is one that
integrates multiple (autonomous) databases so
There was some discussion along these lines over on the
FederatedSearchBlog, which if you didn't see you might want to peruse...
http://federatedsearchblog.com/2009/03/19/beyond-federated-search/
http://federatedsearchblog.com/2009/03/20/beyond-federated-search-the-conversation-continues/
htt
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
On Apr 21, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Mike Taylor wrote:
I, and most of the people I've worked with, have been using the terms
"metasearch", "federated search", "broadcast search" and "distributed
search" synonymously for years. Have they now settled down
>From one of the Federated Search vendor's perspective...
It seems in the broader web world we in the library world have lost
"metasearch". That has become the province of those systems (mamma, dogpile,
etc.) which search the big web search engines (G,Y,M, etc.) primarily for
shoppers and trav
Jonathan:
I think you've cut to the chase on this one and seen the potential. I
went to one of the roll out presentations at Midwinter on Summon, and
was quite impressed. As someone who *was* an aggregator of metadata in
the recent past (NSDL in the early part of this decade), I can attest to
t
I think I like your term "aggregated index" even better than "local
index", thanks Peter. You're right that "local" can be confusing as far
as "local to WHAT".
So that's my new choice of terminology with the highest chance of being
understood and least chance of being misconstrued: "broadcast
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 21, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
It _would_ be great if SerSol would actually give you (if you were
subscribed) a feed of their harvested and normalized metadata, so
you could still pay them to collect and normalize it, but t
From: "Jonathan Rochkind"
If you want to reclaim the term "federated" to mean a local index, I think
you have a losing battle in front of you.
It's not a battle I plan to pursue, I don't fight battles anymore. I just
feel obligated to observe that when vocabulary is tinkered with in this
fas
Peter Murray wrote:
I don't think it is part of SerSol's business model to offer a feed of
the full metadata it aggregates, but it does seem to be part of the
business model to offer an API upon which you could put your own
interface to the underlying aggregated data.
Yep, it's not pres
It is possible for a consortium to build the same sort of service as Serials
Solutions. Besides the OhioLink example, we've been doing that in Ontario for
the last 7 years or so - aggregating ejournal content (15 million articles),
abstract and index databases (over 100 now in partnership with
Agree. When you step outside libraryland and into corporate/enterprise
IT (thinking Autonomy, FAST, etc.) then "federated search" is often used
to refer to aggregated local indexing of distinct databases.
Jason
--
Jason Stirnaman
Digital Projects Librarian/School of Medicine Support
A.R. Dykes L
*Digital Initiatives Metadata Librarian /Library Assistant Professor -
University of Vermont Libraries*
The University of Vermont Libraries' Center for Digital Initiatives
(CDI, http://cdi.uvm.edu/) seeks a detail-oriented, innovative, and
energetic librarian for the position of Digital Initiati
35 matches
Mail list logo
