Temporary Systems Engineer Position Open at Ohio State University Libraries
University Title: Systems Developer/Engineer
Working Title: Systems Integration Coordinator
Department: University Libraries-University Libraries
Department Location: Columbus
Requisition Number: 350169
Here's a thought:
John Riley in an authority record is linked through the 670 field (author of
Cells today) where Cells today is the 245 in a bibliographic record. Let's
assume there are about 4 John Riley(s) who wrote about cells, each in their own
bib record. If any bibliographic record is
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Tim Spalding t...@librarything.com wrote:
I'd love to get some people together to agree on a standard book
annotation format, so two people can tweet about the same book or
other library item, and they or someone else can pull that together.
I'm inclined to
Have you looked the the citation microformat (
http://microformats.org/wiki/citation) ? Don't know where work with this
stands but it seems pretty interesting to me.
Karen
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Mark A. Matienzo m...@matienzo.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Tim Spalding
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Tim Spalding t...@librarything.com wrote:
I'm inclined to start adding it to the I'm talking about and I'm
adding links on LibraryThing. I imagine it could be easily added to
many library applications too—anywhere there is or could be a share
this on Twitter
whoops, forgot my footnote :-)
[1]
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-api-announce/browse_thread/thread/fa5da2608865453
I was wondering if there was a good microformat. The trick is that the
citation format is very much about stuff that gets displayed, and
lacks the critical linking ids you'd want—ISBN, SSN, LCCN, OCLC, ASIN,
EAN, etc.
If people know of others that would work, maybe that's the answer.
On Wed, Apr
So almost all of those identifiers can be formatted as a URI. Although
sometimes it takes an info: uri, which some people don't like, but I
like, for reasons relevant to their usefulness here.
ISBN, ISSN, LCCN, and OCLCnum all have registered info: URI
sub-schemes. I once tried to figure
Unless someone can come up with a perfect pre-cooked format—one that
not only covers what we need but is also super easy and
space-efficient (we have only 1/2k to use!)—Why don't we just decide
on:
'simplebib' : {
}
and start filling in fields. I don't think it makes sense to
externalize the
So, okay, the value added stuff you have will indeed be relationships
between entities, which is not too unexpected.
So, yes, I would want a real-time query service (for enhancement of
individual items on display in my system) _as well as_ a bulk download
(for enhancing my data on indexing).
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Tim Spalding t...@librarything.com wrote:
Unless someone can come up with a perfect pre-cooked format—one that
not only covers what we need but is also super easy and
space-efficient (we have only 1/2k to use!)—Why don't we just decide
on:
'simplebib' : {
Just to clarify, encoding identifiers as URI's, my suggestion, is NOT
externalizing the information under another URL. It is just picking
a standard format for identifiers, the identifier format of the web, to
re-use standards and cut down on custom vocabulary. If your 'simplebib'
idea made
I think Twitter annotations would be a good use for
http://thing-described-by.org/ or a functional equivalent. The payload of the
annotation would simply be a description URI and a namespace and value for
descriptions by reference
1. the mechanism would be completely generic, usable for any
Quoting Riley, Jenn jenlr...@indiana.edu:
Hi all,
So if there were FRBRized data available to you (at
least for FRBR group 1 and group 2 entities; *maybe* group 3 as well), what
would you do with it? What kinds of questions would your service (discovery
system, whatever) ask a service that
Karen Coyle,
By ‘create entities’ (below) is it NECESSARY to create records (and keep them
up-to-date), or is it possible/preferable to create them on the fly?
./Ya’aqov
It would be ideal to have an actual entity for each of the FRBR 1, 2 and
3 entities. We could even create entities
Quoting Ziso, Ya'aqov z...@rowan.edu:
Karen Coyle,
By ‘create entities’ (below) is it NECESSARY to create records (and
keep them up-to-date), or is it possible/preferable to create them
on the fly?
./Ya’aqov
the display is created on the fly. the entities need to be somehow
embodied
For our fed search service we very much echo Jonathan's real-time
requirements/use case (we don't build indexes, so bulk download is not of
interest):
access - real-time query (purpose - to enhance data about items found by other
means)
query - by standard IDs (generally this is known item
17 matches
Mail list logo
