Eric Hellman wrote:
We need good global metadata catalog/registries. Which of today's
catalog functions will require a local institutional catalog tomorrow?
I think this is an interesting question.
My opinion is that the libraries of tomorrow will have a distributed catalogue:
some of it
On Jun 7, 2006, at 9:35 AM, Conal Tuohy wrote:
As well as their MARC records, each library of the future will
collect a growing variety of metadata about their holdings, lending
histories, reviews contributed by users, clusters harvested from
usage patterns, or from full-text transcriptions,
Eric Hellman wrote:
Let's consider another function of a library catalog- resource
discovery for users.
Does anyone here really believe that in TEN years Google and/or
competitors (maybe even mine) won't be able to hook into an inventory
control system and deliver full-text, faceted,
On the other hand we are a bunch o' hackers, and there is
more to this thing (whatever it is called) than code. We need
the perspective of catalogers, reference types,
administrators, vendors, etc. Thus, the idea for creating a new list.
Eric, some of these folks are already here and
On Jun 6, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Dinberg Donna wrote:
Eric, some of these folks are already here and listening.
I'm not a hacker (maybe in the next life ...), but am a former
cataloguer
and reference techie with current responsibility for monitoring a
broad
range of innovative discussions,
nucat4lib ?
hepcat4lib ?
nopac4lib ?
andrew
p.s. happy national day of slayer, http://www.nationaldayofslayer.org/
I generally don't get into the discussion threads, but merely enjoy what is
being said. However, Eric...you have touched a nerve. I agree that we need to
be thinking about the way libraries will look in the future. But to say that
the library catalog is serving only the purposes of the people
innovation. Systems deter it.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Teresa Victoriana Sierra
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 2:25 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] next generation opac mailing list
I generally don't get
Hi,
On 6/7/06, Jonathan Rochkind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My impression is that there are LOTS of catalogers interested in
discussing this topic---the future of The Catalog.
As much as I would love to disagree with you, I don't. :) My stance on
this is not to let hackers create applications
On 6/6/06, Alexander Johannesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
You can thank NCSU for bringing the catalogers, reference types,
administrators, vendors, etc. to the table.
Hmm, how so? I've been at the table with many of them for many years
already and know them quite well. :) Are you
Hiya,
On 6/7/06, Ross Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That by trotting out their Endeca powered catalog, they've finally
gotten the tangible that we nerds have been unable to get
institutional support for. Now every librarian in the country wants
clustering and faceted search.
Sorry, I'm in
: [CODE4LIB] next generation opac mailing list
I have been reading the comments here and I am in favor of creating a
list for discussing the next generation catalog/information
system/whatever. I have been to 2 workshops in the last month where I
have heard 2 people from different universities talk
On 6/6/06, Michael Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need something. My ILS has decided that their next generation
catalog will be a portal with its own database, etc. I already have one
database with MARC data why do I need another to hold the non-MARC data.
Why isn't my ILS working to
13 matches
Mail list logo
