Re: [logging] 1.1.1? (was Re: Digester 1.8-RC1 available)

2006-11-19 Thread Simon Kitching
On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 13:58 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote: I can help with preparing a 1.1.1 release. Great! I'm currently cleaning up JIRA for LOGGING. So far I've gone through Versions and have removed the non-JCL versions that came over in the transition from Bugzilla. A bunch of

Re: [logging] 1.1.1? (was Re: Digester 1.8-RC1 available)

2006-11-19 Thread Simon Kitching
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 19:36 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote: What work are you referring to? As a point release, we should focus on things fixed + pom update (also fixed). What else? I'm not aware of anything that's outstanding (exception LOGGING-111, awaiting feedback from original poster). Oh,

Re: [logging] 1.1.1? (was Re: Digester 1.8-RC1 available)

2006-11-19 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 11/19/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 19:36 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote: What work are you referring to? As a point release, we should focus on things fixed + pom update (also fixed). What else? I'm not aware of anything that's outstanding (exception

Re: [logging] 1.1.1? (was Re: Digester 1.8-RC1 available)

2006-11-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 11/17/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 17:39 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 11/17/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/17/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ * Going to JCL 1.1 we should be aware of

[logging] 1.1.1? (was Re: Digester 1.8-RC1 available)

2006-11-17 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 11/17/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 17:39 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 11/17/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/17/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ * Going to JCL 1.1 we should be aware of MEV-392 [1], and whether