On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 21:11 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
or should we try to create a POM for commons-logging-api or perhaps both?
not sure
the API works best as a virtual dependency. it can be satisfied by JCL
1.0.x, 1.1.x, by ceki's adapter or by Torsten's null implementation.
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 20:32 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 21:11 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
or should we try to create a POM for commons-logging-api or perhaps both?
not sure
the API works best as a virtual dependency. it can be satisfied by JCL
1.0.x,
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,n
Thanks it's great job which fixes some troubles.
But I have a trouble concerning the pom published [1].
I have recorded an MEV issue [2]
A commons-logging developper's can put a comment or approve it ?
Thanks,
- Olivier
[1]
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 20:51 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,n
Thanks it's great job which fixes some troubles.
But I have a trouble concerning the pom published [1].
I have recorded an MEV issue [2]
A commons-logging developper's can put a comment or approve it ?
I'm gonna tweak the poms in the repository outside of apache, please
add the optional property in the optional dependencies for future
versions.
I'll take a look to the other jars to make poms.
On 5/15/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 20:51 +0200, Dennis
