[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-24 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-24 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-24 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-24 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2005-10-24 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2005-10-24 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36773] - [digester] [PATCH] NodeCreateRule does not correctly handle namespaced attributes

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36773. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36773] - [digester] [PATCH] NodeCreateRule does not correctly handle namespaced attributes

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36773. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

New Component Idea - Commons MetaData

2005-10-24 Thread James Carman
All, JDK5 annotations allow us to supply metadata about classes, methods, fields, packages, etc. But, the metadata has to be included in the source code! Maybe we can come up with a standardized way to register metadata about a class into some repository. A discussion at TheServerSide.com

RE: New Component Idea - Commons MetaData

2005-10-24 Thread James Carman
Of course, we could just extend Commons Attributes! Didn't know that already existed, duh! -Original Message- From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 11:07 AM To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' Subject: New Component Idea - Commons MetaData

Re: [pool] synchronization issues in Pool

2005-10-24 Thread Sandy McArthur
On 10/23/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: are there any pool developers out there with time to pick this up? otherwise, we could probably do with a volunteer to go through and analyse these issues. anyone fancy taking a crack at this? I'm not a pool dev but I'll make some

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37226] New: - [pool] synchronization issues in StackObjectPool

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37226. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37226] - [pool] synchronization issues in StackObjectPool

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37226. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37227] New: - [pool] synchronization issues in GenericObjectPool

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37227. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37227] - [pool] synchronization issues in GenericObjectPool

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37227. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37226] - [pool] synchronization issues in StackObjectPool

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37226. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [pool] synchronization issues in Pool

2005-10-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 14:32 -0400, Sandy McArthur wrote: On 10/23/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: are there any pool developers out there with time to pick this up? otherwise, we could probably do with a volunteer to go through and analyse these issues. anyone fancy

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37227] - [pool] synchronization issues in GenericObjectPool

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37227. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [pool] synchronization issues in Pool

2005-10-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 22:11 +0100, sebb wrote: On 23/10/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 14:56 +0100, Stephen Colebourne wrote: This looks interesting. I'll leave the pool comments to a pool developer. However, could adding a lot more

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37228] New: - [pool] synchronization issues in SoftReferenceObjectPool

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37228. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37228] - [pool] synchronization issues in SoftReferenceObjectPool

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37228. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37234] New: - [pool] synchronization issues in GenericKeyedObjectPool

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37234. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37234] - [pool] synchronization issues in GenericKeyedObjectPool

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37234. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37235] New: - [pool] synchronization issues in StackKeyedObjectPool

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37235. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37235] - [pool] synchronization issues in StackKeyedObjectPool

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37235. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [pool] synchronization issues in Pool

2005-10-24 Thread sebb
On 24/10/05, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/23/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: are there any pool developers out there with time to pick this up? otherwise, we could probably do with a volunteer to go through and analyse these issues. anyone fancy taking

Re: [pool] synchronization issues in Pool

2005-10-24 Thread Sandy McArthur
On 10/24/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: unless some one beats me to it, once the patch is available i'll add myself to the dev list and review (as time permits). Patches submitted. While I'm at it would it be desirable to transition to the privately head lock idiom it

svn commit: r328160 - /jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/project.xml

2005-10-24 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Mon Oct 24 14:54:41 2005 New Revision: 328160 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=328160view=rev Log: Added some comments on the usage of the dependencies. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/project.xml Modified:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31526] - [attributes] Ability to add attributepackages in maven

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31526. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [pool] synchronization issues in Pool

2005-10-24 Thread Mayur Naik
Hi Oliver, The tool is still a research prototype but I intend to release it in the near future. I took a quick look and it seems like my tool might not be very useful on the commons transaction code because that code uses sophisticated locking primitives which the current version of my tool

svn commit: r328229 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/exec/trunk/pom.xml

2005-10-24 Thread brett
Author: brett Date: Mon Oct 24 18:57:51 2005 New Revision: 328229 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=328229view=rev Log: add ciManagement Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/exec/trunk/pom.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/exec/trunk/pom.xml URL:

svn commit: r328231 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/exec/trunk/pom.xml

2005-10-24 Thread brett
Author: brett Date: Mon Oct 24 19:00:35 2005 New Revision: 328231 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=328231view=rev Log: setup preliminary nag address Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/exec/trunk/pom.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/exec/trunk/pom.xml URL:

Re: svn commit: r328231 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/exec/trunk/pom.xml

2005-10-24 Thread Dion Gillard
Can we make these go to the dev list please?? On 10/25/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: brett Date: Mon Oct 24 19:00:35 2005 New Revision: 328231 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=328231view=rev Log: setup preliminary nag address Modified:

svn commit: r328238 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/env/jsp/RootContext.java

2005-10-24 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Mon Oct 24 19:27:12 2005 New Revision: 328238 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=328238view=rev Log: Better variable name (vr - variableResolver) and getter/setter. Modified:

[ALL] Continuum (was Re: svn commit: r328231 snip/)

2005-10-24 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 10/24/05, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we make these go to the dev list please?? snip/ Continuum will generate a fair bit of traffic, especially if many Commons components take it up. IMO, given the nature of Commons, subscribing build statuses / integration results to the dev

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31526] - [attributes] Ability to add attributepackages in maven

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31526. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [ALL] Continuum (was Re: svn commit: r328231 snip/)

2005-10-24 Thread Brett Porter
We can open this up for discussion. This is the reason I just sent it to myself for now. But we do have a copy of Continuum running on the Maven zone that can be used (its out of date right now - it will be updated tomorrow for the new release). There are limitations with the current Maven

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-javaflow (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

2005-10-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-javaflow (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

2005-10-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-24 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-24 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-24 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-24 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2005-10-24 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2005-10-24 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue