On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 12:49 -0400, Sandy McArthur wrote:
Since you mentioned not breaking backwards compatibility I started
working on a fresh implementation which I think is coming along very
well and I intend to contribute back to the commons.
sounds good
moving to 2.0 gives a little more
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 21:05 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 17:42 -0400, Sandy McArthur wrote:
snip
While I'm at it would it be desirable to transition to the privately
head lock idiom
it might (however) stop a user doing something equivalent through
Since you mentioned not breaking backwards compatibility I started
working on a fresh implementation which I think is coming along very
well and I intend to contribute back to the commons.
I've uploaded JavaDocs of what progress I've made so far. I figure I'm
about 45% done not including unit
