RE: [lang] .lang.math (WAS: Words - for 2.0)

2003-08-17 Thread Eric Pugh
I think from earlier posts the plan is to deprecate the methods in lang, but only after math reaches a 1.0 release. Eric Pugh -Original Message- From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 7:00 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: FW: [lang] .lang.math (WAS:

Re: [lang] .lang.math (WAS: Words - for 2.0)

2003-08-17 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Doesn't work like that :-) [math] is a very large mathematics/statistics package. This is suited to mathematical or statistical analysis. [lang].math is a small convenient addition to the JDK. It contains classes that should be in the JDK, such as number ranges and fraction. These will always

Re: [lang] .lang.math (WAS: Words - for 2.0)

2003-08-17 Thread Henri Yandell
My fault for starting this :) I can see that over time a balance between lang and math would occur. If lang.math had too much in [ie) is Range really common enough etc etc] then it would deprecate in favour of [math]. Ditto for [text]. If we include Word* stuff now, then later when [text] is

Re: [lang] .lang.math (WAS: Words - for 2.0)

2003-08-17 Thread Mark R. Diggory
Yes, I think its better to wait until [math] has matured before making any decisions about what to keep in lang and what to depricate. I really think your point about not holding code back is a valid and powerfull statement. We have plenty of future to work through the details of consolidation