[io] Next release - was Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
I would normally consider a minor point release to be essential bug fix only (in the numbering system we've been using). Perhaps, rather than trying to release 1.3.2, we should release [io] v1.4 (still JDK1.3 compatible). Stephen - Original Message From: Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 22 May, 2007 8:51:10 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2 I committed a small patch to the trunk today (IO-121) - since this release seems delayed is there any objections to me porting this to the 1.3 branch so it makes the 1.3.2 release? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-121 The change is v.small - just adding a new resetByteCount() method to ThresholdingOutputStream that has 2 lines in it. Niall On 5/17/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have fixed the issues with the file permissions and added license headers to most of the files, with the only exception of MANIFEST.MF. Now, I'd like to call for another vote on the release of commons-io 1.3.2. The proposed distributables can be found at http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/dist A KEYS file is included. The proposed site is at http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/site Thanks, Jochen [ ] +1 [ ] =0 [ ] -1 -- My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day without ever returning as much as a single mouse. Fortunately, I've got a wife who's a real champ: She leaves the house and returns within half an hour, carrying whole bags full of meal. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [io] Next release - was Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
On 5/23/07, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would normally consider a minor point release to be essential bug fix only (in the numbering system we've been using). OK I won't port to the 1.3 branch. Perhaps, rather than trying to release 1.3.2, we should release [io] v1.4 (still JDK1.3 compatible). I'll leave that up to the RM. Niall Stephen - Original Message From: Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 22 May, 2007 8:51:10 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2 I committed a small patch to the trunk today (IO-121) - since this release seems delayed is there any objections to me porting this to the 1.3 branch so it makes the 1.3.2 release? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-121 The change is v.small - just adding a new resetByteCount() method to ThresholdingOutputStream that has 2 lines in it. Niall On 5/17/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have fixed the issues with the file permissions and added license headers to most of the files, with the only exception of MANIFEST.MF. Now, I'd like to call for another vote on the release of commons-io 1.3.2. The proposed distributables can be found at http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/dist A KEYS file is included. The proposed site is at http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/site Thanks, Jochen [ ] +1 [ ] =0 [ ] -1 -- My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day without ever returning as much as a single mouse. Fortunately, I've got a wife who's a real champ: She leaves the house and returns within half an hour, carrying whole bags full of meal. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
I committed a small patch to the trunk today (IO-121) - since this release seems delayed is there any objections to me porting this to the 1.3 branch so it makes the 1.3.2 release? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-121 The change is v.small - just adding a new resetByteCount() method to ThresholdingOutputStream that has 2 lines in it. Niall On 5/17/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have fixed the issues with the file permissions and added license headers to most of the files, with the only exception of MANIFEST.MF. Now, I'd like to call for another vote on the release of commons-io 1.3.2. The proposed distributables can be found at http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/dist A KEYS file is included. The proposed site is at http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/site Thanks, Jochen [ ] +1 [ ] =0 [ ] -1 -- My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day without ever returning as much as a single mouse. Fortunately, I've got a wife who's a real champ: She leaves the house and returns within half an hour, carrying whole bags full of meal. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
On 17/05/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/17/07, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The site report page http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/site/project-reports.html says that the RAT report is a Report on binary and source API differences between releases That's a bug in the rat-maven-plugin and cannot easily be fixed now. Sorry, OK, in that case, perhaps the text could be changed? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
No votes yet, so I wanted to ask what your thoughts were on including: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-117 in 1.3.2? Hen On 5/17/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have fixed the issues with the file permissions and added license headers to most of the files, with the only exception of MANIFEST.MF. Now, I'd like to call for another vote on the release of commons-io 1.3.2. The proposed distributables can be found at http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/dist A KEYS file is included. The proposed site is at http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/site Thanks, Jochen [ ] +1 [ ] =0 [ ] -1 -- My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day without ever returning as much as a single mouse. Fortunately, I've got a wife who's a real champ: She leaves the house and returns within half an hour, carrying whole bags full of meal. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
On 5/18/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No votes yet, so I wanted to ask what your thoughts were on including: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-117 in 1.3.2? Fine with me, if you apply it to both branch and trunk. Jochen -- My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day without ever returning as much as a single mouse. Fortunately, I've got a wife who's a real champ: She leaves the house and returns within half an hour, carrying whole bags full of meal. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
Was there a response to my comment [1] about r518770? -Rahul (long, possibly fragmented URL below) [1] http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--io--fileupload--svn-commit%3A-r518770---in--jakarta-commons-proper-io-trunk-src%3A-java-org-apache-commons-io-FileCleaningTracker.java-test-org-apache-commons-io-FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase.java-p9520876.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
On 5/18/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Was there a response to my comment [1] about r518770? Sorry, I wasn't reading your comment. But, to be honest, I have to admit that after reading it, I do not understand what you propose as a better solution? Jochen -- My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day without ever returning as much as a single mouse. Fortunately, I've got a wife who's a real champ: She leaves the house and returns within half an hour, carrying whole bags full of meal. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
On 5/18/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/18/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Was there a response to my comment [1] about r518770? Sorry, I wasn't reading your comment. But, to be honest, I have to admit that after reading it, I do not understand what you propose as a better solution? snip/ I'm proposing to declare the FileCleaningTracker in DiskFileItem to be transient. FileCleaningTracker is currently returning a brand new instance after a round trip (its not really being serialized, it shouldn't be declared Serializable IMO). I'm away this weekend, and probably won't be able to respond further till Monday, sorry about that. -Rahul Jochen -- My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day without ever returning as much as a single mouse. Fortunately, I've got a wife who's a real champ: She leaves the house and returns within half an hour, carrying whole bags full of meal. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
On 5/18/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/18/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No votes yet, so I wanted to ask what your thoughts were on including: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-117 in 1.3.2? Fine with me, if you apply it to both branch and trunk. Done. Fix version set to 1.3.2. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
2007/5/17, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Now, I'd like to call for another vote on the release of commons-io 1.3.2. Hey wait a moment! I don't want to annoy you, but if a JAR has been created and made available to the public, it is typical to create a new version (in your case 1.3.3). As Wendy (Smoak) noted, when someone writes in the mailing list about a 1.3.2 version, you will say what 1.3.2 version?. It could be a nightmare to track it. I don't think that a few license headers are a problem, but anyway... Antonio
Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
On 5/17/07, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey wait a moment! I don't want to annoy you, but if a JAR has been created and made available to the public, it is typical to create a new version (in your case 1.3.3). As Wendy (Smoak) noted, when someone writes in the mailing list about a 1.3.2 version, you will say what 1.3.2 version?. It could be a nightmare to track it. I don't think that a few license headers are a problem, but anyway... We haven't yet released a version 1.3.2. Of course, if we had, then I'd never dare to call this 1.3.2 again. Jochen -- My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day without ever returning as much as a single mouse. Fortunately, I've got a wife who's a real champ: She leaves the house and returns within half an hour, carrying whole bags full of meal. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
On 5/17/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We haven't yet released a version 1.3.2. Of course, if we had, then I'd never dare to call this 1.3.2 again. In a perfect world, a non-snapshot version gets built exactly once and either promoted or discarded. Since the world isn't perfect, sometimes we delete the tag and try again. :) -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
On 17/05/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have fixed the issues with the file permissions and added license headers to most of the files, with the only exception of MANIFEST.MF. Now, I'd like to call for another vote on the release of commons-io 1.3.2. The proposed distributables can be found at http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/dist A KEYS file is included. The proposed site is at http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/site The site report page http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/site/project-reports.html says that the RAT report is a Report on binary and source API differences between releases However it is only a license check currently. Is there an API difference report somewhere? Thanks, Jochen [ ] +1 [ ] =0 [ ] -1 -- My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day without ever returning as much as a single mouse. Fortunately, I've got a wife who's a real champ: She leaves the house and returns within half an hour, carrying whole bags full of meal. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
For some reason the jars do not have the license or notice file. I ran mvn install from the 1.3.2 source distro and it built a jar with those files - so I don't understand why. Niall On 5/17/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have fixed the issues with the file permissions and added license headers to most of the files, with the only exception of MANIFEST.MF. Now, I'd like to call for another vote on the release of commons-io 1.3.2. The proposed distributables can be found at http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/dist A KEYS file is included. The proposed site is at http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/site Thanks, Jochen [ ] +1 [ ] =0 [ ] -1 -- My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day without ever returning as much as a single mouse. Fortunately, I've got a wife who's a real champ: She leaves the house and returns within half an hour, carrying whole bags full of meal. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
On 5/17/07, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The site report page http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-io/site/project-reports.html says that the RAT report is a Report on binary and source API differences between releases That's a bug in the rat-maven-plugin and cannot easily be fixed now. Sorry, Jochen -- My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day without ever returning as much as a single mouse. Fortunately, I've got a wife who's a real champ: She leaves the house and returns within half an hour, carrying whole bags full of meal. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
