[CommunityEngine] Re: Rails 2.3 compatibility

2009-05-01 Thread Bruno Bornsztein
See this thread about rmagick capitalization. Might solve your issue. http://groups.google.com/group/communityengine/browse_thread/thread/d0cd62c99e871837?hl=en Thanks, Bruno On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:10 PM, eksatx errolsie...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe I should clarify: I am not trying to

[CommunityEngine] Re: Rails 2.3 compatibility

2009-04-23 Thread Bruno Bornsztein
Ok, just merged the desert branch into edge (and deleted the desert branch). So the edge branch now runs on Desert and is Rails 2.3 compatible. To install: rails your_app_name -m http://www.communityengine.org/install_template.rb Thanks, Bruno On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Bruno Bornsztein

[CommunityEngine] Re: Rails 2.3 compatibility

2009-04-23 Thread eksatx
I wasn't so lucky. Stack trace: ... file config/application.yml gem desert gem rmagick gem hpricot gem htmlentities gem haml gem aws-s3 rake gems:install [sudo] password for errol: rake aborted! no such file to load

[CommunityEngine] Re: Rails 2.3 compatibility

2009-04-23 Thread eksatx
I also get an error trying to generate the CE migrations. It tells me I am missing the rmagick gem, even though I know it is installed and working (my existing stable version of CE relies on it). From the stack trace: Missing these required gems: rmagick You're running: ruby 1.8.7.72 at

[CommunityEngine] Re: Rails 2.3 compatibility

2009-04-23 Thread Tom Bostelmann
i had similar problems when i used synaptic package manager (for ubuntu) to install rmagic and the mysql gem. if you're using a package manager to install gems instead of 'gem' itself, this might be part of the problem. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:51 PM, eksatx errolsie...@gmail.com wrote: I

[CommunityEngine] Re: Rails 2.3 compatibility

2009-04-23 Thread eksatx
Thanks for the response, but while I am using Ubuntu also, I did not use synaptic to install rmagick. I used synaptic to install ruby, built and installed gem from source, then installed rails and all other gems (including rmagick) with gem. Again, the stable branch of CE is working fine and

[CommunityEngine] Re: Rails 2.3 compatibility

2009-04-22 Thread Bruno Bornsztein
Update: installing CE (the Desert version) is getting even easier: rails your_app_name -m http://github.com/bborn/communityengine/raw/desert/community_engine_setup_template.rb (If you're willing to try out the Desert version of CE) This will build a complete Rails app with CE installed in one

[CommunityEngine] Re: Rails 2.3 compatibility

2009-04-19 Thread Bruno Bornsztein
Update: I have a CE branch going that uses Desert instead of Engines: http://github.com/bborn/communityengine/tree/desert I'll playing with this for a couple of days in my apps to see how well it integrates, and wether I want to move in that direction. As always, feedback is appreciated. Thanks,

[CommunityEngine] Re: Rails 2.3 compatibility

2009-04-17 Thread Bruno Bornsztein
Update; after doing some more investigating, looks like some of the Engines features I really like (namely, code mixing) break in 2.3. For example, even with the latest Engines plugin installed, helpers aren't being mixed correctly. I'm going to spend a little more time thinking about how to

[CommunityEngine] Re: Rails 2.3 compatibility

2009-04-16 Thread Tom Bostelmann
I'm a little confused. I thought the 'edge' branch was where you were working on rails 2.3 changes. In fact, I'm using the 'edge' branch with my project as we speak - the big caveat being that I'm using only a subset of the functionality. In any case, sorry for posting my confusion - but is

[CommunityEngine] Re: Rails 2.3 compatibility

2009-04-16 Thread Bruno Bornsztein
Edge is where the development happens, but I hadn't done any 2.3 compatibility stuff there yet. I'm keeping the Rails 2.3 stuff in its own branch (rails_2.3) to allow people to test it out before merging it into edge. On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Tom Bostelmann tbostelm...@gmail.comwrote: