Erik van der Werf wrote:
...
Optimal play on 6x6 under Chinese rules is expected
to give a Black win by 4 points.
I want to lay open, why my expectation for
6x6-Go under Chinese rules is +2 for Black.
With Leela, I played two games (or game fragments)
in analysis mode, starting the machine
To satisfy my standards of proof, games would have to be post-analyzed to
determine whether either side could have made better moves. Duplicate games
would be thrown out; games with inferior play would be tossed. We might not
have the resources to completely solve the game, but we could improve
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if even size boards are special, but it seems to me that
such small boards should have very high komi's. 4.0 seems pretty low
but then I'm really no expert on komi's and I'm a pretty weak player so
I'm not in
The approach of this paper is to treat all win rate estimations as
independent estimators with
additive white Gaussian noise.
Have you tried if that works? (As Łukasz Lew wrote experimental setup
would be useful) I guess
there may be a flaw in your idea, but I am not a specialist. I will try
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 09:42 -0700, terry mcintyre wrote:
To satisfy my standards of proof, games would have to be post-analyzed to
determine whether either side could have made better moves. Duplicate games
would be thrown out; games with inferior play would be tossed. We might not
have the
This is an interesting idea, but do you have any actual results? If you
implement this kind of rave formula do you get a stronger program?
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:computer-go-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason House
Sent: Wednesday, September 24,
