I checked these variation myself and with valkyria and it seems to be
sensible.
-Magnus
Quoting Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I took all the games played by Leela in my 6x6 experiment and applied
mini-max to them, taking the statistics at various depths into the
games.
Don't know if there
Thanks.
- Don
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 11:56 +0200, Magnus Persson wrote:
I checked these variation myself and with valkyria and it seems to be
sensible.
-Magnus
Quoting Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I took all the games played by Leela in my 6x6 experiment and applied
mini-max to
Currently Many Faces' strength peaks at 32 cores, and goes down with more. On
a single core, strength increases 50 to 80 ELO points per doubling of
performance. On multiple processors the rate of increase is much less. The
increase is very sensitive to communication latency, so a [EMAIL
It seems likely now that the correct komi for 9x9 is 7.0. If so, I'd prefer
6.5 komi to 7.5, since 6.5 would have black winning most games, and most
other games have a first player advantage. This would give 9x9 go a similar
first player advantage.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
No. on 9x9 without sekis, the score must be odd, 5, 7, or 9.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Antonin Lucas
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 12:16 PM
To: computer-go
Subject: Re: [computer-go] On ranks 2 and 3 of 9x9 in Beijing
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:13 PM,
I had heard somewhere that there are some who believe 8.0 is the right
komi for 9x9 Chinese. I personally believed for a long time it was 7.0
based on statistical data of games.However that can be misleading.
I noticed with CGOS data that White has a very slight edge with 7.5 but
I also
So are you saying that you can get even scores, but most of the games
will have odd scores? So it's possible for the correct komi to be
even if best play must result in a seki situation?
- Don
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 05:29 -0700, David Fotland wrote:
No. on 9x9 without sekis, the score must
Microsoft just released Windows HPC server 2008, a server operating system
for high performance clusters. Their MPI implementation is about 10% faster
than Linux on the huge machines with thousands of cores.
I'm working with the Microsoft HPC group. They have been exceptionally
helpful.
David
Yes. An even score requires a seki with an odd number of neutral
(uncounted) points. So even komi is possible, but unlikely since very few
games end with seki, unless the score is very unbalanced.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
For instance, if an intersection belongs to the same colour in all
playouts, chances are
that it is fairly secure (that doesn't mean one
shouldn't play there, sacrifices there may have an impact on other
intersections).
Ok, that one was well know (ownership maps, territory
We've got some decent results (or at least interesting pictures) by
looking at the correlation between controlling a particular point and
winning the game.
Peter Drake
http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/
On Oct 3, 2008, at 7:47 AM, Claus Reinke wrote:
Do these make sense? And are there other
My engine is basic UCT+MC. I've been letting it ponder on small empty boards with a certain komi to see if it begins to converge to the correct position value.
It does as long as the tree is allowed to grow. But as soon as the tree reaches its node limit (with simulations continuing), the
Hi;
the node limit is a hard limit on the number of nodes ?
if yes, when you reach this limit, what do you do - you remove some nodes
with small number of simulations ?
Olivier
My engine is basic UCT+MC. I've been letting it ponder on small empty
boards with a certain komi to see if it begins
13 matches
Mail list logo
