Hi Sylvain,
I think it's starting to make sense now. :-)
Sorry to be unclear. I wish we have a white board where we could discuss
and
that would sorted out in a few minutes :).
Several results turn up in a google search ;p
http://www.google.com/search?q=online+white+board
What I tried to
terry mcintyre wrote:
I notice that the 2008 icga chess tournament is limited to 8 cores.
David Levy's justification seems curious to me. He mentions that an
early microcomputer held its own against a mighty mainframe, and that
many top chess programs run on PCs, but he wishes to discourage
Dave Dyer wrote:
I think general hardware limits are good, because they will permit
more teams to be competitive without altering the nature of the
competition.
So in effect, it's an admission that the strength of some teams should
be crippled in a completely arbitrary way, because they
On Jan 10, 2009, at 8:16 AM, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
Dave Dyer wrote:
I think general hardware limits are good, because they will permit
more teams to be competitive without altering the nature of the
competition.
So in effect, it's an admission that the strength of some teams should
be
Hello Gian-Carlo,
Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
The computer chess forums are ablaze with protests,
because ...
[But] the decision seems to have been cast in stone,
with no amount of protest still being able to reverse it.
I think, this is indeed the case.
But at least YOU would have reason
Mark Boon wrote:
Please, don't sneer.
???
I have seen a lot of discussion, but no good reasons that make sense for
the decision that was made.
What Davy Dyer said IS a good reason, and most likely the real one. But
the people in favor of the decision will not like to admit this. So it's
good
Ingo Althöfer wrote:
What prevents you from freezing in your chess
activities for the next few months and hobbying
full (free) time on computer go.
The amount of chess players compared to the amount of go players.
--
GCP
___
computer-go mailing
Le jeudi 8 janvier 2009, Nuno Milheiro a écrit :
It seems normal to me, Blac is only one play ahead, which value is several
points (probably 7,5 hence the komi value) given intelligent play, given
random play the value of one more move may be only one point.
You should try with more komi
Hello everyone,
I am trying to do some genetic experiment with virtual go players I
programmed using basic neuronal network technology. The principle is to test
my randomly mutated players against each other and to kill the losers. I
have used Opengo library to make my players play against each
Hello everyone,
I am trying to do some genetic experiment with virtual go players I
programmed using basic neuronal network technology. The principle is to test
my randomly mutated players against each other and to kill the losers. I
have used Opengo library to make my players play against each
10 matches
Mail list logo
