Hi Sylvain, I think it's starting to make sense now. :-)
> Sorry to be unclear. I wish we have a white board where we could discuss > and > that would sorted out in a few minutes :). Several results turn up in a google search ;p http://www.google.com/search?q=online+white+board > What I tried to mean is that when you do the backup for a given node, you > look at the part of the playout that happen after that node (including > that > node), and you do a normal AMAF backup for that part of the playout. > Does it make sense? > I hope we make progress and I am not making things more confusing :). > I should write a pseudo code I guess, but for today I am too lazy :). > > Sylvain I tried putting this into pseudo code, but it already looks like C. ;p http://pastie.org/357231 If you could look at it, I would be most grateful. -Isaac -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
