On 06.01.2017 23:37, Jim O'Flaherty wrote:
into a position with superko [...] how do you even get AlphaGo into a the arcane
state in the first place,
I can't in practice.
I have not provided a way to beat AlphaGo from the game start at the
empty board.
All I have shown is that there are
Okay. So I will play along. How do you think you would coax AlphaGo into a
position with superko without AlphaGo having already simulated that pathway
as a less probable win space for itself when compared to other playing
trees which avoid it? IOW, how do you even get AlphaGo into a the arcane
To my knowledge, fishtest is also a major part of stockfish engine. It
is essential because there is lot of possible improvement and most of
them win only 2 or 3 elo points, but added, it lead to 60-70 elo points
between each release (every one year or something like that)
Le 06/01/2017 à 17:22,
Ray was Japanese student program that went on 7th, UEC cup 2016.
Ray
http://computer-go-ray.com/eng/index.html
Thare is a stronger version of Ray, with policy net and value net.
https://github.com/zakki/Ray/tree/nn
CGOS BayesElo is 3463 (Rn.3.3-4c).
http://www.yss-aya.com/cgos/19x19/bayes.html
Hi,
If I understood correctly you would try to use a program using value net
with (let's say 2000 playouts) in selfplay? Using only one result, or
Yes. 2000 playouts/move MCTS with policy net and value net.
doing some games per position? Or are you thinking of using only the win
I thought
Oh sorry I mispoke, corporate players losing interest is a bad thing in my
mind but also more or less inevitable(to some degree anyway). I was simply
saying that as delighted as I am that google and other players are putting
so much money and research into go I suspect eventually the resources
And why would it be desirable that 'the big corporate players lose interest
to devote computer power'?
And who are those big corporate players? Deepmind? Who are not even selling
their bot? Or are you talking about CS/Zen who are having indeed financial
interests here?
What would be the benefit of
A closer example than the mersenne prime search is fishtest from the chess
engine world. My understanding is that it is a key part of why stockfish is
such a strong chessengine.
https://github.com/glinscott/fishtest
A large group of volunteers that essentially donate compute power to test
A project similar to the Great Mersenne Prime search might be a
possibility to distribute the work of training the network among many
enthousiasts, and to keep improving it by self play.
On 1/6/17, Andy wrote:
> What is Ray? Strongest open source bot? Anyone have a link
What is Ray? Strongest open source bot? Anyone have a link to it?
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Hiroshi Yamashita wrote:
> If value net is the most important part for over pro level, the problem is
> making strong selfplay games.
>
> 1. make 30 million selfplay games.
> 2.
Maybe now we need AlphaGo vs. Tartrate to see who is the definitive Sai XD
2017-01-06 6:39 GMT-03:00 Hiroshi Yamashita :
> If value net is the most important part for over pro level, the problem is
> making strong selfplay games.
>
> 1. make 30 million selfplay games.
> 2.
Hi,
this sounds interesting! AlphaGo paper plays only with RL network, if I
understood correctly. If we start this huge approach we should try to
carefully discuss the way (and hopefully get some hints from people
tried with much computational power :)
If I understood correctly you would try to
12 matches
Mail list logo