Hello,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:44:44PM +0100, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
> On 12/01/2017 11:55, Rémi Coulom wrote:
> > It is the mail server of this mailing list that is not well
> > configured. Even my own messages are classified as spam for me now.
> > The list does not send DKIM
It is the mail server of this mailing list that is not well configured. Even my
own messages are classified as spam for me now. The list does not send DKIM
identification.
- Mail original -
De: "Gian-Carlo Pascutto"
À: computer-go@computer-go.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 12
On 11-01-17 18:09, Xavier Combelle wrote:
> Of course it means distribute at least the binary so, or the source,
> so proprietary software could be reluctant to share it. But for free
> software there should not any problem. If someone is interested by my
> proposition, I would be pleased to
Patrick, for what it's worth, I think almost no-one will have seen your
email because laposte.net claims it's forged. Either your or
laposte.net's email server is mis-configured.
> Refering to Silver's paper terminology and results, greedy policy
> using RL Policy Network beated greedy policy
On 12/01/2017 11:55, Rémi Coulom wrote:
> It is the mail server of this mailing list that is not well
> configured. Even my own messages are classified as spam for me now.
> The list does not send DKIM identification.
It's been a while since I looked at this in depth, but the problem seems
to be
So I will start to create software, and if someone want to use it you
will be free as free software, and I already found someone
who is ready to host the server side.
From a practical point of view, I will use public key signing to
distribute go software (binary or source), so I will ask the