In the original Mogo paper it's the initial value for the children, rather
than try every child once.
-Original Message-
From: computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org [mailto:computer-go-
boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of Petr Baudis
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:43 AM
To:
I don't have a spare machine for that, but if someone else wants to
run one, I have no objection.
Peter Drake
http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/
On Sep 19, 2009, at 5:01 AM, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
Great!
Will you let it play on cgos?
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:57:12AM -0700, Peter Drake
Congratulations to MoGoTW, winner of yesterday's KGS bot tournament.
My report is at http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/past/51/index.html. It is
longer than usual - perhaps because I found this event, with a very
strong entry and a fast format, particularly interesting.
As usual, I am sure there
On Sep 21, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Peter Drake dr...@lclark.edu wrote:
housebot tried to declare all of the white stones at the top dead,
and Orego disagreed. A cleanup phase was entered, and I believe
housebot crashed during the cleanup phase.
By the rules of the game end protocol, support
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 08:18:37AM -0700, David Fotland wrote:
In the original Mogo paper it's the initial value for the children, rather
than try every child once.
Ah, you mean the First Play Urgency! Thanks, I will try that.
Anyway, I'm happier; after fixing many bugs and improving my
Nick Wedd: b0h5qxcry7tkf...@maproom.demon.co.uk:
Congratulations to MoGoTW, winner of yesterday's KGS bot tournament.
My report is at http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/past/51/index.html. It is
longer than usual - perhaps because I found this event, with a very
strong entry and a fast format,
