i'm simply stunned. i'll have to check it out.
s.
- Original Message
From: Hellwig Geisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: computer-go computer-go@computer-go.org
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 1:39:19 AM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] Re: Java hounds salivate over this:
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 15:12
What part of a go program written in C or C++ are you guys having
portability problems with? In dimwit there might be some assumptions,
like ints being at least 32 bits, that are not portable, and we use a
64-bit type, which is not described in the C++ standard (the C99
standard does have one).
Now that takes me back to days of your. Can we run TECO on a PDP-10 emulator?
Early
versions of EMACS were actually written on top of TECO -- how's that for layers
upon layers
of emulation?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_Editor_and_Corrector
- Original Message
From: Dave Dyer
The approach that C supports is chaos: deal with
it.
Is it an approach? or a mere fact of consecuences ?
I mean, people started to build C compilers on every
machine, thats all. The standard library is less
standard than any other thing...
C was one of the first mainstream languages, also was
At 03:12 PM 6/15/2007, steve uurtamo wrote:
my last $0.02 on this -- let me know when you've written a kernel in java, and
tell me how fast your operating system (written entirely in java) runs.
I could point out that lisp machines had no other language at the
core. The entire operating system
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 15:12 -0700, steve uurtamo wrote:
my last $0.02 on this -- let me know when you've written
a kernel in java, and tell me how fast your operating system
(written entirely in java) runs.
what? that can't be done? :)
Well, in fact that can be done... :-)
