Re: More on recess appointments

2003-06-14 Thread David M Wagner
Recess appointees look anomalous from a constitution-maker's perspective, but the Constitution we actually have provides for them (Art. II. Sec. 2, paragraph 3). The reference here to vacancies presumably refers to the wide range of officers listed in paragraph 2. Is there a textual argument that

Re: Bowers Overruled

2003-06-26 Thread David M Wagner
one. This, on the shoulders of the existing tradition of deference to military judgment (Rostker), could salvage the prohibition. Still, the dictum of Capt. Queeg seem singularly apt: "You can't assume a goddam thing in this Navy." David M. Wagner

Re: Do Not Call

2003-09-25 Thread David M Wagner
thepresent case fromFDA v. Brown Williamson, on which the court relied in part. There, Congress had manifesteda positivedisinclination to give the agency the power that it claimed. David M. Wagner

Re: Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference

2003-10-15 Thread David M Wagner
s win, Red Soxlose, Yanks win the Series. Can't say I'm happy about any of this. David M. Wagner Regent University School of Law -Original Message-From: Discussion list for con law professors [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zietlow, Rebecca E.Sent: Wednesday, Octobe