Re: The Original Meaning of the Judicial Power

2003-08-26 Thread Randy Barnett
/SOL.htm (Structure of Liberty page) -Original Message- From: Discussion list for con law professors [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eastman, John Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The Original Meaning of the Judicial Power Randy, I've just had

Re: The Original Meaning of the Judicial Power

2003-08-26 Thread Randy Barnett
://www.RandyBarnett.com/SOL.htm (Structure of Liberty page) -Original Message- From: Discussion list for con law professors [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eastman, John Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The Original Meaning of the Judicial Power Randy

Re: The Original Meaning of the Judicial Power

2003-08-26 Thread Eastman, John
- From: Randy Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The Original Meaning of the Judicial Power My apologies to the list. I had thought John's message to me was off-list, as was supposed to be my response. My reply was dashed off

Re: The Original Meaning of the Judicial Power

2003-08-21 Thread Francisco Martin
I've just read Prof. Barnett's paper, and I urge others to read it. It helped me put to rest some issues surrounding judicial review. However, I have a few comments: 1. Prof. Barnett argues that Morris claimed that the new Constitution could not be ratified by the state legislatures under the

Re: The Original Meaning of the Judicial Power

2003-08-21 Thread Randy Barnett
I thank Professor Martin for his close reading of my paper and will reconsider the two characterizations by which I introduce the quotes from Madison and Morris in light of his comments.This is the great thing about posting articles prepublication. However, I should emphasize that I presented